Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean > > install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I > > haven't seen before on F37 when I tried the same

[Test-Announce] 2023-04-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 38 Blocker Review Meeting

2023-04-09 Thread Adam Williamson
# F38 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2023-04-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have only 2 proposed Final freeze exception issues to review, but let's plan a review meeting in case anything else shows up. If you have time tonight, you can take

Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing. Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a 3r

F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing. Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a 3rd-party repository (the Intel oneAPI repo), and it i

Re: TeXLive 2023

2023-04-09 Thread Iñaki Ucar
I'm not sure what could be the issue, but I can reproduce this by creating the simplest hello-world package containing: Recommends: tex(latex) When I build this package and try to install it in Fedora <= 38, texlive is pulled. But nothing else (apart from the package itself) is installed in rawhi

Testing Release Upgrades via Discover

2023-04-09 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
Hello, as many of you know, the Fedora KDE spin doesn't have the ability to upgrade to a new stable release in a graphical manner and we always had to resort to using DNF System Upgrade [1] to upgrade to the next stable release. Thanks to the work done by aleasto [2] on this MR [3], discover up

Re: octave 8.1 update coming to rawhide

2023-04-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 4/8/23 17:27, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 4/5/23 20:22, Orion Poplawski wrote: I will be updating octave to 8.1 this weekend.  This involves a soname bump and I will be rebuilding all deps. Builds are complete and update submitted: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-56669c4d

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

2023-04-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
Ok we need rename it to freeworld On Fri, 2023-04-07 at 20:55 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > libheif has been retired at rpmfusion due to koji  issues. > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626 > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230409.n.0 changes

2023-04-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-38-20230407.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230409.n.0 changes

2023-04-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 38 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 996.06 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

SPDX Statistics - Easter edition

2023-04-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Two weeks ago we had: * 22882 spec files in Fedora * 29366license tags in all spec files * 19784 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet(huray, we are under 20k) * 7912tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` Today we have: * 22918 spec files in Fedora * 29406license