Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

2023-02-04 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Sharing the same point of view, I failed to understand why as open > source the community failed to properly produce a better documentation > for a plugin and better documentation for a cross platform front > package manager like PackageKit while continuing to yet anothe

Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

2023-02-04 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2023-02-03 21:49, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Michael Catanzaro wrote: A PackageKit backend for dnf5 would also work and I have no doubt it will happen regardless. Surely that'd be the best option for Fedora if dnfdaemon does not have the same D-Bus API that PackageKit does, because pushin

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

2023-02-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 15:41 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 13:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > > please let me know and we can work together to get

Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

2023-02-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 2023-02-02 09:33, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Red Hat is currently planning to port everything we care about that uses PackageKit to use dnfdaemon's D-Bus API. Currently that's gnome-software, gnome-shell, and gnome-initial-setup. (I think that's all we have in Fedora Workstation that depends o

Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

2023-02-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 2023-02-02 08:16, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 02. 02. 23 v 5:41 Gordon Messmer napsal(a): Right now, I don't see any documentation for plugins, the general API docs are (subjectively) terse, and the DNF5 git repo has a banner with warning signs that says "The API/ABI is currently unstable." 

Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

2023-02-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 2023-02-02 01:49, Neal Gompa wrote: Is the current plan to support the PackageKit API in the dnf daemon, or to port packagekit's dnf backend to the dnf5 API? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5 Well, having it supported in PackageKit is certainly part of the plan once i

libindi upgrade to 2.0.0 and soname bump

2023-02-04 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Hello folks, in a week or so (after f38 branch) I plan to upgrade libindi core (AKA indilib), indi-3rdparty-libraries and indi-3rdparty-drivers to 2.0.0. This will make the soname bump to 2 and will need the two dependent packages, kstars and stellarium, to be upgraded to be compatible with it. A

Re: HEADS-UP: Upcoming retirement of long-term-unused packages for Rust crates

2023-02-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:24 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:49 PM Josh Stone wrote: > > > > On 11/22/22 8:13 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > List of Rust library-only packages, > > > > > > - rust-rustfilt > > > > This one does have a binary, a Rust equivalent to binutil

Heads-up: python-flask-migrate updating to 4.x in Rawhide and F38/Branched

2023-02-04 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week (2022-02-11), or slightly later, I plan to update python-flask-migrate[1] to 4.0.1 in Rawhide and F38 (which will have branched by then). An upstream changelog is available[2]. Dependent packages are module-build-service, odcs, and pgadmin4. COPR testing[3] did not reveal any probl

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230204.n.0 changes

2023-02-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230202.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230204.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 158 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 4.24 GiB Size of dropped packages