On 2023-02-03 21:49, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
A PackageKit backend for dnf5 would also work and I have no doubt it
will happen regardless. Surely that'd be the best option for Fedora if
dnfdaemon does not have the same D-Bus API that PackageKit does,
because pushing dnf-specific code into upstream projects when
PackageKit exists is not very friendly.
Pushing DNF-specific code is also unlikely to happen for projects such as
KDE Plasma Discover, so if we want those to keep working, we will need the
PackageKit D-Bus API implemented one way or the other.
Sharing the same point of view, I failed to understand why as open
source the community failed to properly produce a better documentation
for a plugin and better documentation for a cross platform front
package manager like PackageKit while continuing to yet another
fragmentation.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
