Thanks. Here is the Feodra 29 Milestone for DNF5:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/milestone/1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
It is proposed as a Change for Fedora 39. There are indeed quite a few features
that will need to be completed between now and then.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2870
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023, at 8:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> Are th
On 1/26/23 18:30, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
There seems to be lots of missing functionality IMHO.
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772
Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:49:10PM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> TL;DR; Check if you have correct e-mail in Red Hat Bugzilla Mail field in
> Fedora Accounts [0]. Empty mail is also OK.
>
> the Red Hat Bugzilla Email field in Fedora Accounts [0] was till now ignored
> by most of
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, as seen by the lenght of the packages listed in my emails,
> thsi is not always the case.
Yeah. ;(
> Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders
> and then they forget to actually fi
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:15 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> Having read all the responses, I'm more inclined to head down the road
> of orphanage, giving other people a chance to adopt the package. Due to
> my limited knowledge of (packaging) Rust, I don't feel I'm the right
> person to be main admin for B
Well, well, well. What a surprise. I'd never thought getting this amount
of response.
Let me try to answer some questions that came up as best as I can. I
will not go into the discussion of RPM vs. Flatpak. That should probably
be carried on in a thread of its own. Suffice to say that my knowl
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders
> and
> then they forget to actually fix the FTBFS, cannot figure out how to fix it,
> are blocked on externalities that never happen, etc.
Perhaps ASSIGNED should
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Oh but they are different. FTBFS are not urgent and the policy is only set
> to
> retire packages that FTBFS for more than 2 release cycles.
>
> For a package to be considered for retirement in February 23, it would
> have to
> fail to build:
On 26. 01. 23 20:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
packages
should be retir
Hi Neil,
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 16:34 -0500, Neil Hanlon wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> My name is Neil Hanlon and I was recently sponsored into the
> packager's group by Michel Salim, adding python-sdnotify
> [1] to Fedora and EPEL. sdnotify is a dependency for some other
> packages I hope to contribute
Hey Neil,
Great to see you here. Hopefully we'll bump into each other again sometime
in 2023.
JT
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:34 PM Neil Hanlon wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> My name is Neil Hanlon and I was recently sponsored into the packager's
> group by Michel Salim, adding python-sdnotify
> [1] to Fe
Hi folks!
My name is Neil Hanlon and I was recently sponsored into the packager's group
by Michel Salim, adding python-sdnotify
[1] to Fedora and EPEL. sdnotify is a dependency for some other packages I hope
to contribute to Fedora.
I began working with Linux in my teens and over the past deca
I’ve been wanting to package python-orjson specifically, and to get up to speed
on Rust packaging in general. I would be happy to co-maintain python-orjson and
its dependencies. It’s a weak dependency for python-fastapi, and python-cattrs
would like to have it for some integration tests.
– Ben
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> > > packages
> > > should be retired from Fedora 38 app
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 22:53, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:29 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > See
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > > Some libstdc++ headers included in older versions
> > > a
On Tue Jan 24, 2023 at 22:44 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to
> keep up with upstream releases, especially since the introduction of
> Rust components.
What (rust) dependencies are missing? Is it just python-orjson?
I worked on packagin
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 14:55 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
> > > On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > > >
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 15:49 +, Patrick Griffis via devel wrote:
> > IMHO, retiring a Fedora package in favor of an upstream binary of
> > whatever
> > kind (Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, RPM, binary tarball, whatever) is a
> > major
> > disservice to Fedora users and defeats the whole point of hav
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 14:55 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
> > On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > > > On
Hey folks! Wanted to send a note out for any maintainers who may be
waiting on openQA test results for critical path updates etc. Tests are
currently taking much longer than usual to be completed because there's
a large backlog. The Rawhide mass rebuild, plus the three critical bugs
(python-ptyproc
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:41 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adam Williamson:
>
> > 6 (__libc_message.cold+0x5) [0x7fbae3c2560f]
> > Jan 25 13:38:47 fedora /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1040]: (EE) 6:
> > /lib64/libc.so.6 (malloc_printerr+0x15) [0x7fbae3c96a05]
> > Jan 25 13:38:47 fedora /usr/libexe
On Thu, Jan 26 2023 at 03:49:55 PM -, Patrick Griffis via devel
wrote:
How is an orphan package a good service to users? It will just become
outdated and degrade over time.
Either (a) somebody else will take the package after it has been
orphaned, or else (b) the package will be retired a
Dne 26. 01. 23 v 16:07 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 15:37 +0100:
Dne 26. 01. 23 v 14:55 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a):
Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18
> IMHO, retiring a Fedora package in favor of an upstream binary of whatever
> kind (Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, RPM, binary tarball, whatever) is a major
> disservice to Fedora users and defeats the whole point of having a
> distribution to begin with.
How is an orphan package a good service to u
This feature is implemented in hotness, which is commenting in Bugzilla.
It's already implemented in dist-git and Pagure as well.
This is now waiting for new version of Pagure to be available in Fedora
infra,
dist-git with the changes is already available. :-)
You can look at the upcoming monit
Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 15:37 +0100:
>
> Dne 26. 01. 23 v 14:55 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a):
> > Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
> > > On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > > > > Dne 25. 01.
Maybe we can start by filtering out the most outrageous applications:
anything that uses --filesystem=home, --filesystem=host, or unfiltered
session bus access. That still leaves plenty of possible sandbox holes,
but it's better than nothing.
We could do this just in GNOME Software and KDE D
On Thu, Jan 26 2023 at 09:23:35 AM -0500, Neal Gompa
wrote:
But we know that people don't read those. We also know that ISVs
cannot generally be trusted with regards to the permissions they set
for their own apps. This is literally why Android and iOS changed
their model. If you want to encourag
Dne 26. 01. 23 v 14:55 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a):
Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:25 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 07:51 -0500:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:43 AM Jiri Eischmann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > >
On 26/01/2023 13:42, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
I maintain both packages in Fedora and flatpaks on Flathub, so I can
compare. The review to get an app to Flathub was as thorough as Fedora
package review. In some ways even stricter. It's not like "it builds,
it runs, you're good to go". They care about
Robert Marcano via devel píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 09:00 -0400:
> On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > >
> > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> >
Neal Gompa píše v Čt 26. 01. 2023 v 07:51 -0500:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:43 AM Jiri Eischmann
> wrote:
> >
> > Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> > >
> > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
> > > >
> > > > wrote
On 1/26/23 8:42 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this
particular case,
but the push towards (upstream)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:43 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
> >
> > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
> > > wrote:
> > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this
> > > > p
Hi everyone,
the new version of Anitya [0] (1.7.0) is deployed on production.
The major change in this version is the migration to Bootstrap 5 [1],
this means that there is a new design of Anitya.
It also helped to unify the page design in Anitya.
The reason to move to Bootstrap 5 was the cha
Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100:
>
> Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch
> > wrote:
> > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this
> > > particular case,
> > > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfo
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 1:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems Anitya correctly distinguishes stable and pre-release
> > releases but where to set that I want Fedora bugs only for the stable
> > releases? IIRC Pagure had
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems Anitya correctly distinguishes stable and pre-release
> releases but where to set that I want Fedora bugs only for the stable
> releases? IIRC Pagure had a switch for it, but I am unable to find it
> on the https://src.f
Hi,
it seems Anitya correctly distinguishes stable and pre-release
releases but where to set that I want Fedora bugs only for the stable
releases? IIRC Pagure had a switch for it, but I am unable to find it
on the https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/. There is only
"No-Monitoring", "Monitoring", an
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-01-27 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/
___
devel maili
* Adam Williamson:
> 6 (__libc_message.cold+0x5) [0x7fbae3c2560f]
> Jan 25 13:38:47 fedora /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1040]: (EE) 6:
> /lib64/libc.so.6 (malloc_printerr+0x15) [0x7fbae3c96a05]
> Jan 25 13:38:47 fedora /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1040]: (EE) 7:
> /lib64/libc.so.6 (_int_free+0x9e5)
Adam Williamson wrote:
> OTOH, it's not reasonable to dictate to the person maintaining a Fedora
> package whether they should think that's a reasonable use of their time
> or not. The current maintainers of Bottles decided they trust the
> upstream developers to distribute their software 'properly
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:29:22AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 01. 23 v 19:53 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > The second issue is that systems that update to systemd-253~rc1-1.fc38
> > > seem to get stuck on boot. With Plymout
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230125.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230126.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 287
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 9.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 02:36:56PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I think we're fixed now. Here is the side tag & Bodhi update:
>
> Thank you for taking care of that.
>
> > - I have added support for rpmautospec
>
> That's great.
>
>
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230126.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the r
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 19:34 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless,
given this
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 19:53 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
The second issue is that systems that update to systemd-253~rc1-1.fc38
seem to get stuck on boot. With Plymouth enabled you just see the
splash screen. With it disabled (or by pressing es
52 matches
Mail list logo
