Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

2023-01-25 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen > approximately

Re: Some heads-ups for Rawhide users: python3-ptyprocess and systemd issues

2023-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just wanted to send out a heads-up for Rawhide users about > some issues that have shown up in openQA testing. > > First, you may have found that trying to update to today's Rawhide > fails like this: > > Error: Transaction te

Re: (Fixed) Re: Most OCaml packages have broken deps now

2023-01-25 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I think we're fixed now. Here is the side tag & Bodhi update: Thank you for taking care of that. > - I have added support for rpmautospec That's great. > - There is now a cyclic dependency between ocaml-pp and ocaml-dune, > which I

Re: Most OCaml packages have broken deps now

2023-01-25 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > FYI debuginfo generation failed on several packages. I've had to > disable it on a few to get around this. For example: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96625872 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5

Heads up for KiCad in Rawhide

2023-01-25 Thread Steven A. Falco
KiCad will shortly be upgraded from 6.0.11 to 7.0.0-rc2 in Rawhide. Designs created with KiCad 6 and earlier are readable / editable by KiCad 7. However, once a design is saved with KiCad 7, it will no longer be readable by KiCad 6 or earlier. Steve

Re: Error in python3-ptyprocess on latest update

2023-01-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XI2QFIRCUJGX2FMEJ5K6ILLXOIWBGBIN/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Error in python3-ptyprocess on latest update

2023-01-25 Thread Reon Beon via devel
Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ptyprocess-0.7.0-py3.11.egg-info from install of python3-ptyprocess-0.7.0-2.fc38.noarch conflicts with file from package python3-ptyprocess-0.7.0-1.fc38.noarch ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Some heads-ups for Rawhide users: python3-ptyprocess and systemd issues

2023-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The second issue is that systems that update to systemd-253~rc1-1.fc38 > seem to get stuck on boot. With Plymouth enabled you just see the > splash screen. With it disabled (or by pressing esc) it seems to be > stuck at "Stopped initrd-

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. > > > Nevertheless, > > > given this would be used just for

Some heads-ups for Rawhide users: python3-ptyprocess and systemd issues

2023-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! Just wanted to send out a heads-up for Rawhide users about some issues that have shown up in openQA testing. First, you may have found that trying to update to today's Rawhide fails like this: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ptyprocess-0.7.0-py3.

Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38, apron-0.9.13-16.fc38, and 182 more

2023-01-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: ...snip... > Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't > the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version > around? Nope, koji and pungi have no idea about 'older' or 'newer', they only

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 17:42 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case, > >>but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortun

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:45 Jaroslav Skarvada napsal(a): On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote: Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless, given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclud

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case, but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/ Can you elaborate on why you feel that way? I don't trust upst

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case, > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/ Can you elaborate on why you feel that way? josh ___ devel mail

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless, > > given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude > > side > > tags from the policy? Who wou

Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38, apron-0.9.13-16.fc38, and 182 more

2023-01-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > How do you edit the list of builds (to remove a build)? I cannot see > any way to do this in the UI. Thanks Mamoru Tasaka for editing it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones

Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38, apron-0.9.13-16.fc38, and 182 more

2023-01-25 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2023/01/25 22:12: On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update: bod

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

2023-01-25 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 1/25/23 13:04, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> IQmoljussilehtola > > I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous > mail like last time. I know that they're working with up

Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38, apron-0.9.13-16.fc38, and 182 more

2023-01-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 > > apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update: > > > > bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:38 PM Pete Walter wrote: > > I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks > either. > > Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated > so we can keep it in Fedora. It looks like Bottles itself doesn't con

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Vascom
Seems as bad practice to drop packages by upstream request. ср, 25 янв. 2023 г. в 14:38, Pete Walter : > > I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks > either. > > Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated > so we can keep it i

sprintf assertion failure in rawhide

2023-01-25 Thread Florian Weimer
glibc-2.36.9000-24.fc38 should fix this assertion failure: Fatal glibc error: printf_buffer_as_file.c:31 (__printf_buffer_as_file_commit): assertion failed: file->stream._IO_write_ptr <= file->next->write_end It's a logic bug in the fortified implementation of the sprintf family of functions. T

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Pete Walter
I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks either. Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated so we can keep it in Fedora. Pete 25.01.2023, 10:56, "Vít Ondruch" :I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular ca

Re: Late F38 proposal: Packaging 22+ (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-01-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 25. 01. 23 12:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote: NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this proposal was su

Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38, apron-0.9.13-16.fc38, and 182 more

2023-01-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 > apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update: > > bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma: 0) > This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0

Re: Late F38 proposal: Packaging 22+ (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-01-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this > > > proposal was submitted after the deadline because th

Re: Late F38 proposal: Packaging 22+ (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-01-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote: NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the package update proved to be broader than anticipated. https://fedo

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote: Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless, given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude side tags from the policy? Who would handle such request? Although being able to modify one macro means

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

2023-01-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > IQmoljussilehtola I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous mail like last time. I know that they're working with upstream to package the next version of IQmol, so this sho

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

2023-01-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case, but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/ Vít Dne 24. 01. 23 v 22:44 Sandro napsal(a): Hi, Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to keep up with upstream releases, especial

Re: FYI xz 5.4.1 in Fedora updates (F36, F37, Rawhide)

2023-01-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 01. 23 17:21, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 01. 23 16:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8 F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475 One package which is known

Re: FYI xz 5.4.1 in Fedora updates (F36, F37, Rawhide)

2023-01-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 25. 01. 23 11:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['unzip', '-t', '/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.12.0a4/build/debug/build/test_python_64979æ/tmpau1avwr6/archive.zip']' returned non-zero

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless, given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude side tags from the policy? Who would handle such request? Although being able to modify one macro means also possibility to edit all macros. Not

Re: FYI xz 5.4.1 in Fedora updates (F36, F37, Rawhide)

2023-01-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['unzip', '-t', > '/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.12.0a4/build/debug/build/test_python_64979æ/tmpau1avwr6/archive.zip']' > returned non-zero exit status 80. > **Unzip Output** > Archive: > /bu

(Fixed) Re: Most OCaml packages have broken deps now

2023-01-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I think we're fixed now. Here is the side tag & Bodhi update: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=62208&order=-build_id&latest=1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981 - - - Here are the scripts I used to do the build, including the custom make

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

2023-01-25 Thread Richard Lescak
Unfortunately we have tried to use 'koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1' command but it always ended with 'koji: ActionNotAllowed: tag permission required (logged in as USER)' even when creator of the sidetag used the command. On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue,