On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 02:59:20PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Ben Cotton writes:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_15
> >[...]
> > === Plan ===
> >
> > * Prepare PostgreSQL 15 in Copr (TBD)
> > * Rebuild important dependencies in Copr (TBD)
> > * Debug and fix compatib
> For the last 20 years or so, RPM has used a home-grown OpenPGP parser
> for dealing with keys and signatures. That parser is rather infamous
> for its limitations and flaws, and especially in recent years has
> proven a significant burden to RPM development. In order to improve
> security and fre
PS: At the very least, you could add a checkbox to allow a maintainer to opt
out permanently of automatic expiration (it would still be possible to
manually click on "Expire now"), as opposed to having to click dozens of
buttons (an everincreasing number, since there is not even an "Extend all"
Hi,
I am really angry at Copr's expiration policy once again. It looks like I
missed the deadline to renew the expired chroots (I still do not get any
notification mails, they end up eaten in a spam filter somewhere), so once
again a lot of data was deleted forever with no way to recover it.
(
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is
> requ
On 12-10-2022 17:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:15 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:47 PM Stephen Smoogen
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming
wrote:
On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-10-12/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-10-12-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-10-12/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-10-12-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a current release
candidate. As a result, Fedora Linux 37 Final is NO-GO.
The next Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 20 October in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
the "target date #1" milestone of 25 O
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_15
>[...]
> === Plan ===
>
> * Prepare PostgreSQL 15 in Copr (TBD)
> * Rebuild important dependencies in Copr (TBD)
> * Debug and fix compatibility issues found in dependencies (a
> reasonable amount of non-critical in FTBFS s
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 14:24, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> E.g. my scratch build of ceph (
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92955292) failsthusly:
>
> ...
>
> DEBUG util.py:443: Error:
> DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: package perl-Archive-Tar-2.40-490.fc37.noarch
> requires per
E.g. my scratch build of ceph (
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92955292) failsthusly:
...
DEBUG util.py:443: Error:
DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: package
perl-Archive-Tar-2.40-490.fc37.noarch requires
perl(IO::Uncompress::UnXz), but none of the providers can be installed
DEB
https://youtu.be/VsnJymZRQOM
is really excellent, thank you Miroslav
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:28 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 10. 22 v 12:03 Sébastien Le Roux napsal(a):
> > Dear All,
> > I joined the packaging team recently, or should I say I joined the
> mailing list, since for the rest
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 08:08:32AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Oh, also I forgot to mention...
> >
> > If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old
> > builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could
> > be anoying if you told people a spec
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
Dne 12. 10. 22 v 17:02 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
My guess is that dnf5 is an entirely different beast than dnf. dnf was
written in python, dnf5 is written in C (?), so it's not just a major
version upgrade.
It is different beast for developers and author of plugins. Otherwise 1) it has
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:47:07AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> > On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
> >
> > Unless we're going to call it RUM when it makes its way into RHEL,
Constantly changing the name/command of the package manager seems like a
huge annoyance to end users at best, and a point of discouragement at worst.
Think about all the guides that can be found via search engines for how to
do things in a given OS. If we're constantly changing the package
manage
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:15 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:47 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> >> On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >> > Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
> >>
> >> Unless w
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:47 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>> On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
>>
>> Unless we're going to call it RUM when it makes its way into RHEL, that
>> name ma
Il 12/10/22 12:28, Vít Ondruch ha scritto:
> So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was
> elaborated here and my wish in package review to have the package name
> just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here.
>
> Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:31 AM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
>
> Unless we're going to call it RUM when it makes its way into RHEL, that
> name may not be the best choice :-)
>
Let's not forget all the o
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
>
> Unless we're going to call it RUM when it makes its way into RHEL, that
> name may not be the best choice :-)
>
>
Well Red Hat shipped the Yell
On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Maybe call it the Fedora Update Manager 'FUM' ?
Unless we're going to call it RUM when it makes its way into RHEL, that
name may not be the best choice :-)
--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
__
Since we are in the final freeze for F37, and the update breaks ABI (and API),
the Updates Policy for stable releases applies, and an exception request would
need to be submitted and approved first.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_exceptions
https://github.com/OpenIm
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 09:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 10. 22 v 12:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was
> elaborated here and my wish in package review
> > to have the package name just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll
Dne 12. 10. 22 v 12:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was elaborated here and my wish in package review
to have the package name just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here.
Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not DN
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 08:56:38PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:11 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > capstone orphan, rebus, ret2libc 1
> > > weeks ago
> >
> > [Affecting
Dne 12. 10. 22 v 12:03 Sébastien Le Roux napsal(a):
Dear All,
I joined the packaging team recently, or should I say I joined the mailing
list, since for the rest I am
still looking for a sponsor and all that ... anyway I want to share few ideas
with you ...
In my first messages I highlighted th
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 07:19, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm working on a rebase of the MySQL package (community-mysql).
>
> I'm getting:
> 'No space left on device'
> errors very consistently.
> It happens on every single architecture, which is odd as usually such
> problems in KOJI are a
OLD: Fedora-37-20221010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:40 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 4:22 PM, Micah Abbott wrote:
> > So I took a few hours here and there over the last few days to build a
> > small project using the ostree native container functionality. I wanted
> > to create a variant of Fedora
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Branched 20221012.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 152
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 22.23 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 10/12/22 13:03, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
Dear All,
I joined the packaging team recently, or should I say I joined the
mailing list, since for the rest I am
still looking for a sponsor and all that ... anyway I want to share few
ideas with you ...
In my first messages I highlighted that the d
Hello,
I'm working on a rebase of the MySQL package (community-mysql).
I'm getting:
'No space left on device'
errors very consistently.
It happens on every single architecture, which is odd as usually such
problems in KOJI are arch-specific.
It happens very early during testsuite execution.
Exa
So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package name was
elaborated here and my wish in package review to have the package name
just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here.
Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not DNF and it needs
different name, then please ra
Dear All,
I joined the packaging team recently, or should I say I joined the
mailing list, since for the rest I am
still looking for a sponsor and all that ... anyway I want to share few
ideas with you ...
In my first messages I highlighted that the documentation might need
some updates / impro
Hi
To bring the mingw python build macros on par with the native python
package, I'd need the following reviewed:
* mingw-python-pip:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2134019
* mingw-python-wheel:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2134020
* mingw-pyproj
38 matches
Mail list logo
