Hello there!
I've never seen this error before
`error: Plugin selinux: hook fsm_file_prepare failed`
but I would try
`dnf reinstall container-selinux`
and maybe
`dnf reinstall podman`
Hope this helps
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:27 AM Nathanael D. Noblet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wondering if thi
On 3/30/22 18:59, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:33 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Looking at the builds with gcc, there is an extra option passed to gcc:
-I./libs/zlib which is not passed to clang. So maybe this is an issue
with the build system?
You may have looked at an older build as t
Hello,
Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I
upgraded from F35 to F36Beta last night. Today I ran `sudo dnf update`
and saw some odd output. Not sure if its a bug with dnf or selinux or
the packages being installed. Let me know if its a known issue or if I
need to file a
On 3/30/22 18:59, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:33 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Looking at the builds with gcc, there is an extra option passed to gcc:
-I./libs/zlib which is not passed to clang. So maybe this is an issue
with the build system?
You may have looked at an older build as t
On 3/30/22 8:33 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Looking at the builds with gcc, there is an extra option passed to gcc:
-I./libs/zlib which is not passed to clang. So maybe this is an issue
with the build system?
You may have looked at an older build as that is pointing to the bundled MinGW zlib.
My
On 3/30/22 18:33, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 3/30/22 17:01, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 11:36 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
ar is failing so the fault is in binutils at the first look.
By the way:
- First of all, should /usr/lib64/wine/aarch64-windows/libdbghelp.a (or any
other static archiv
On 3/30/22 17:01, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 11:36 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
ar is failing so the fault is in binutils at the first look.
By the way:
- First of all, should /usr/lib64/wine/aarch64-windows/libdbghelp.a (or any
other static archive) be packed
(i.e. are static archive
On 3/30/22 09:36, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote on 2022/03/31 1:25:
On 3/30/22 8:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all
targets enabled on Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.o
On 3/30/22 11:36 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
ar is failing so the fault is in binutils at the first look.
By the way:
- First of all, should /usr/lib64/wine/aarch64-windows/libdbghelp.a (or any other
static archive) be packed
(i.e. are static archives needed in wine binary rpm)?
If not, just
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 11:02 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:19 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > Any attempt to connect to pagure.io / pagure.org right now appears to
> > be getting immediately terminated before TLS handshake even runs. It
> > was reported to me by a 3
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-30/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-30-16.31.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-30/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-30-16.31.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022
Michael Cronenworth wrote on 2022/03/31 1:25:
On 3/30/22 8:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all
targets enabled on Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_5
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/229 (x86_64), 8/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220329.n.1):
ID: 1203484 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1203484
ID: 12035
On 3/30/22 8:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all
targets enabled on Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_51-52
OK, bug filed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 5:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Maybe BR overrides usage should be restricted only to users with special
> needs (users in provenpackager or releng groups), while "normal" users
> should be forced to take the side-tag way?
As always, there are special cases. I ce
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:19 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> Any attempt to connect to pagure.io / pagure.org right now appears to
> be getting immediately terminated before TLS handshake even runs. It
> was reported to me by a 3rd party user trying to access some release
> files hosted there, a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:44 AM NightStrike wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, 08:34 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022.
>>
>> Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw' compiler
>> for ARM64
>> builds.
OLD: Fedora-36-20220329.n.1
NEW: Fedora-36-20220330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 124
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:41.04 MiB
Size of
Any attempt to connect to pagure.io / pagure.org right now appears to
be getting immediately terminated before TLS handshake even runs. It
was reported to me by a 3rd party user trying to access some release
files hosted there, and confirmed it myself too.
I would report it to Fedora infra, excep
On 3/30/22 03:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
(removing us...@lists.fedoraproject.org)...
On Wed, Mar 23 2022 at 01:58:33 PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal
wrote:
Unfortunately there is no clean upgrade path to solve the migration
automatically because of unrealistic requirements such as:
- the USB dev
That was it! I somehow missed that change to the macros and undermining
_auto_set_build_flags fixed it. Thanks!
On 29 Mar 2022, at 4:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 16:43 -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
Hey all-
I’m unable to build Swift on Fedora 36 and Rawhide while it does
build on F
On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all
targets enabled on Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_51-52
OK, bug filed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070151
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:37 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 3/30/22 8:26 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > The main llvm package should be capable of this already, as it's a
> > retargetable compiler. The clang package provides a clang program
> > that's capable of this.
>
> The configure test in Wi
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:35 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 30.03.22 15:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 30.03.22 15:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> What does llvm-ming
On 3/30/22 8:26 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
The main llvm package should be capable of this already, as it's a
retargetable compiler. The clang package provides a clang program
that's capable of this.
The configure test in Wine disagrees:
checking for clang... clang
checking whether clang works... y
On 30.03.22 15:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 30.03.22 15:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm
package.
Thanks
Sandro
It is a complete, cross
On 30.03.22 15:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm package.
Thanks
Sandro
It is a complete, cross-compiling, Windows PE building toolchain[
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm package.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sandro
>
>
> It is a complete, cross-compiling, Windows PE building toolchain[1][2] that
On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm package.
Thanks
Sandro
It is a complete, cross-compiling, Windows PE building toolchain[1][2] that uses
llvm instead of gcc. The 'mingw-llvm' package is the llvm backend in PE form and
Welcome Carmelo!
I'm adding you to the repo now ;-).
Best,
Fale
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, at 14:46, Carmelo Sarta wrote:
> Hello there!
> I'm Carmelo (I usually go by laiot on the web), a 24yo new Red Hatter from
> Italy. I'm writing this mail as my personal introduction to the community.
> So far
Hello there!
I'm Carmelo (I usually go by laiot on the web), a 24yo new Red Hatter from
Italy. I'm writing this mail as my personal introduction to the community.
So far I've only helped solve issues on some Github repositories but now
I'm looking forward to work with fale on gopass.
Cheers
--
an
Hi
What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm package.
Thanks
Sandro
On 30.03.22 14:33, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi,
Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022.
Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw'
compiler for ARM64 builds
Hi,
Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022.
Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw' compiler for ARM64
builds. Fedora ships the 'mingw-w64' gcc-based MinGW environment and does not ship
the 'llvm' MinGW environment. Unlike the WineMono package, wh
V Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 05:04:29PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> Il 24/03/22 09:12, Petr Pisar ha scritto:
> > V Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:40:28PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> >> So, now that we have side-tags to perform this kind of builds, does the
> >> buildroot override
On 30. 03. 22 9:54, Frédéric Pierret wrote:
Hello,
Le 3/29/22 à 01:16, Demi Marie Obenour a écrit :
Frédéric, would you be interested in taking python-magic-wormhole?
I believe Qubes OS requires it for remote assistant.
Indeed, we need python-magic package into one of our remote tool. I've t
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220328.0):
ID: 1203264 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello,
Le 3/29/22 à 01:16, Demi Marie Obenour a écrit :
Frédéric, would you be interested in taking python-magic-wormhole?
I believe Qubes OS requires it for remote assistant.
Indeed, we need python-magic package into one of our remote tool. I've took the
main one plus the two side component
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220329.0):
ID: 1203074 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
38 matches
Mail list logo
