Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

It might be worthwhile to have a CFLAG that can tell glibc (or other allocators) to substitute something like calloc for malloc. The environment variable MALLOC_PERTURB_ has been used by glibc malloc for over 15 years. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@l

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 15:41 +0530, Anoop C S via devel wrote: > On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > >

Re: golang failures in the F36 mass rebuild

On 1/21/22 00:27, Florian Weimer wrote: * Tom Stellard: If you maintain a golang package and you are seeing it fail with the error: `flag provided but not defined: -Wl,-z,relro` We can likely drop -Wl,-z,relro completely because it's the binutils (both for BFD ld and gold). I like having

[Test-Announce] 2022-01-24 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2022-01-24 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! We have a few proposals and new community events to talk about, so let's get together for a meeting on

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On 1/21/22 22:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 17:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 16:37, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass rebuild

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 10/25/21 21:09, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects == Summary == All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built. This allows binaries to be identified

Fedora-Rawhide-20220120.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 15/225 (x86_64), 17/157 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed i

ROCm-Device-Libs packaging question

In order to update "rocm-runtime" to the latest, it requires a new package "ROCm-Device-Libs" as a build requirement. The issue is that the project installs files into /usr/amdgcn, which seems incorrect to me based on the FHS and Fedora guidelines. Here's the upstream for reference: https://gith

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 17:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 16:37, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > > On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during > > > the mass rebuild with the fol

GCC 12 question

I've been able to rebuild KiCad using the new gcc-12.0.1-0.2 compiler rpms on Rawhide via mock. While KiCad compiles, it doesn't quite run correctly. As shown in the attached screenshot, all the icons are missing, and have been replaced with question marks. I wonder if this could be caused by

Re: Is systemd-resolved ignoring /etc/hosts?

Oh My shame it's working indeed it was a typo, sorry and thanks :) El vie, 21 ene 2022 a las 17:14, Tomasz Torcz () escribió: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:06:01PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Is there a way that systemd-resolved honors the /etc/hosts file? > > Thanks in advance > > There's R

Re: Is systemd-resolved ignoring /etc/hosts?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:06:01PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Is there a way that systemd-resolved honors the /etc/hosts file? > Thanks in advance There's ReadEtcHosts= setting controlling that. See "man resolved.conf" or /etc/systemd/resolved.conf itself. -- Tomasz Torcz“Fu

F37 Change: Python Dist RPM provides to only provide PEP503-normalized names (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonDistPEP503ProvidesOnly == Summary == The legacy `python3dist(NAME)` and `python3.11dist(NAME)` RPM provides with dots (`.`) in `NAME` will no longer be automatically provided. `NAME` will only be normalized according to [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

> Am 20.01.2022 um 09:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon : > > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > Having a b

Is systemd-resolved ignoring /etc/hosts?

Hi, On Fedora 35, I was that some domain name to be resolved by /etc/hosts entry. Let's says: 54.x.y.z somesite.miexample.com (54.x.y.z is a ipv4 address) With systemd-resolved is not working. This my config: resolvectl domain Global: Link 2 (wlp108s0): Link 3 (docker0): Link 4 (br-775990106eb

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220120.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220119.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220120.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 129 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 345.21 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On 21. 01. 22 19:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:10:53PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 01. 22 19:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: In all cases, if it is some compiler error

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 19:10:53 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 01. 22 19:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>> In all cases, if it is some compiler error or internal compiler error, > >>> pr

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:10:53PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 01. 22 19:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > In all cases, if it is some compiler error or internal compiler error,

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Fri, Jan 21 2022 at 01:04:51 PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: He said this would have prevented over 900 fixed CVE's in Chrome and 12% of all Android CVE's. I believe it. This should be treated like any other security hardening flag. Michael ___

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On 21. 01. 22 19:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: In all cases, if it is some compiler error or internal compiler error, preprocessed source + gcc command line would be highly appreciated, having us

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > In all cases, if it is some compiler error or internal compiler error, > > preprocessed source + gcc command line would be highly appreciated, > > having us to try to rebuild all the packag

Re: Self Introduction: Chung Chung

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:34:05AM -0500, Chung Chung wrote: > > Hi All: > >   My name is Chung, I work in Red Hat and maintain lab systems for my team. > >   I have been doing DevOps/SysAdmin for quite a few years now.   I have done > some RPM package build for my group internally and I would l

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 06:33:21PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:55:01 -0700 > Jerry James wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Another important thing I wanted to say is that we'd like to switch > > > ppc64le from the numerically problematic

Re: s390 ruby build failure

To follow up on this thread, I did a scratch build this morning with some extra instrumentation which was meant to capture the Ruby log file if the build failed. But the scratch build succeeded this time on s390x, although it still failed overall because of the kernel bug. So I decided to leave i

Uninitialized variables and F37

Hello, This is a continuation of the discussion from F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update. Uninitialized variables are a big problem. They can be sources of information exposure if parts of a buffer are not initialized. They can also cause unexpected execution paths if the attacker can groom the m

Re: GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

On 21. 01. 22 17:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote: In all cases, if it is some compiler error or internal compiler error, preprocessed source + gcc command line would be highly appreciated, having us to try to rebuild all the packages again and dig those up will be very time consuming. But I suppose you

Orphaned package: imake

I ported X off of imake a bit over 16 years ago but apparently there's still 20-odd packages that use it. I don't have the bandwidth or interest to maintain it, so someone who does is welcome to pick it up. - ajax ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 12, glibc 2.35) (late System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 17:56 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:00:57PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 1/11/22 13:00, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Reading through the GCC 12 changes, there is a significant new feature to > > > GCC > > > that would appear to be useful f

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 06:42:23PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > > Also note that libmpc failed to build on ppc64le only: > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81535783 > > > > one test core-dumps, I will try a local build to see what's in the core > > Error for mpc_pow_l

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 16:37, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during > > the mass rebuild with the folloing error: > > > > In file included from > > /builddir/build/BUILD/

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

> > > > Also note that libmpc failed to build on ppc64le only: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81535783 > > one test core-dumps, I will try a local build to see what's in the core Error for mpc_pow_ld (1) expected (-9 46) got (1.00e0 0) FAIL tpow_ld (exit status: 1) ^^^

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:55:01 -0700 Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Another important thing I wanted to say is that we'd like to switch > > ppc64le from the numerically problematic IBM extended long double to > > IEEE 754 quad long double. This is an

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:09:39 -0700 Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:06 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > could be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043517 > > Thanks for the pointer, Dan. I think the keyword for this bug is "during RTL pass: final" followed by an ICE segfault

Re: F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 12, glibc 2.35) (late System-Wide Change proposal)

Hello, On Thursday, January 20, 2022 5:56:04 PM EST Marek Polacek wrote: > > > Are there plans to enable this flag so that all applications, but more > > > importantly the kernel, are hardened against uninitialized stack > > > variables? This is one of the major classes of security bugs that > > >

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:06 AM Dan Horák wrote: > could be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043517 Thanks for the pointer, Dan. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: s390 ruby build failure

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:20:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > I can't do that: > > > ~~~ > > $ koji save-failed-tree 81534987 > 2022-01-21 12:20:12,267 [ERROR] koji: ActionNotAllowed: Only owner of failed > task or 'admin' can run this task. And sadly due to the mass rebuild churn it's a

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:55:01 -0700 Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Another important thing I wanted to say is that we'd like to switch > > ppc64le from the numerically problematic IBM extended long double to > > IEEE 754 quad long double. This is an

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:34:28AM +, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu > > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:36 PM > > Hi everyone > > > > I recently sent to the kernel mailing lists a patch set to support > > PGP keys and signatures. > > > > Other than allowing the appr

GCC 12 related issues in rawhide

Hi! There have been way too many mails recently in the gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide thread and separate threads, so for those which we haven't responded to yet or new issues, can I ask you to track it in bugzilla instead of mailing list? For issues where you suspect it is a bug on a package sid

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Another important thing I wanted to say is that we'd like to switch > ppc64le from the numerically problematic IBM extended long double to > IEEE 754 quad long double. This is an ABI change. Some libraries > are already built so that they su

Re: git clone under mock/koji builders

On 21. 01. 22 17:39, Ron Olson wrote: Is it possible to clone a repo as part of a Source line? I’ve been looking and can’t find any examples. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_revision_control and https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-g

Re: git clone under mock/koji builders

Is it possible to clone a repo as part of a Source line? I’ve been looking and can’t find any examples. On 21 Jan 2022, at 10:34, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 01. 22 17:21, Ron Olson wrote: >> Hey all- >> >> I have a package that gets an artifact from a repo /and/ expects to have >> code from a

Re: git clone under mock/koji builders

On 21/01/2022 17:21, Ron Olson wrote: Is there any proper way to checkout code with git from within koji? No. Koji doesn't have network access for security reasons. You must download submodules/etc as sources. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: git clone under mock/koji builders

On 21. 01. 22 17:21, Ron Olson wrote: Hey all- I have a package that gets an artifact from a repo /and/ expects to have code from a different branch in the same repo. In my spec file, I can easily get the artifact via Sources, but getting the code from the separate branch required me to execu

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass rebuild with the folloing error: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Clementine-0be314337d5bbd6fc7f5c76c31d7b87e37ba3a04/src/core/tagreaderclient.h:29,    

Re: git clone under mock/koji builders

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:21:11 -0600 Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I have a package that gets an artifact from a repo *and* expects to have > code from a different branch in the same repo. In my spec file, I can > easily get the artifact via Sources, but getting the code from the > separate b

git clone under mock/koji builders

Hey all- I have a package that gets an artifact from a repo *and* expects to have code from a different branch in the same repo. In my spec file, I can easily get the artifact via Sources, but getting the code from the separate branch required me to execute a “git clone” then checkout the bra

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 21. 01. 22 17:03, Zdenek Pytela wrote: Hey folks, I've just noticed that `ausearch -m AVC,USER_AVC -ts recent` lists a lot of: type=AVC msg=audit(1642770831.616:31668): avc:  denied  { read } for pid=866275 comm="locate" name="plocate.db" dev="dm-0" ino=5268062 scontext=s

RE: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi everyone (note for the infrastructure mailing list: please check if the changes I'm proposing could be tested in the Fedora infrastructure, like Copr) I made the first version of the rpm extension to sign fsverity digests with a GPG key. The patch set (with some bug fixes) is available here:

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 11. 21 18:18, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plocate_as_the_default_locate_implementation > > > > == Summary == > > The venerable `mlocate` program is replaced by `plocate` — a > > compatible reimplementa

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Isn't it just the standard GMail deduplication? Likely. For better or worse, that is the way gmail works. One can see both the advantages and disadvantages of the gmail approach, but it does catch some of the people off-guard at least some o

Fedora Prioritized Bugs update

It's been a while since we've had some Prioritized Bugs that are stuck, but here we are. If you can help move these forward, you are a hero. 1. shim — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955416 — NEW Lenovo ThinkPad T490, unable to boot following clean install, stuck at splash screen Thi

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 15:57 Alain Vigne napsal(a): Thank you all To conclude * I have a working @fedoraproject.org email alias * "external" people can reach me via this alias * I can't receive emails I sent to this alias from my gmail address (which is my ema

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

On 21/01/2022 15:57, Alain Vigne wrote: Thank you all To conclude * I have a working @fedoraproject.org email alias * "external" people can reach me via this alias * I can't receive emails I sent to this alias from my gmail address (which is my email addr

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Thank you all To conclude - I have a working @fedoraproject.org email alias - "external" people can reach me via this alias - I can't receive emails I sent to this alias from my gmail address (which is my email address registered in Fedora Accounts) - I need to dig into https://

Re: Self Introduction: Chung Chung

Welcome Chung! On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 12:45, Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Welcome Chung! > > -- > > Ibiam Chihurumnaya > ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com > > > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:34 PM Chung Chung wrote: > >> >> Hi All: >> >> My name is Chung, I work in Red

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Seems my test email worked On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:18 PM Alain Vigne wrote: > Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to > retrieve it :( > > I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my > fedora... address, and I was expecting to get i

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Why this has to be SO complicated ? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:35 PM Eduard Lucena wrote: > El vie., 21 de enero de 2022 11:18, Alain Vigne > escribió: > >> Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to >> retrieve it :( >> >> I remembered that it should work this

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

El vie., 21 de enero de 2022 11:18, Alain Vigne escribió: > Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to > retrieve it :( > > I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my > fedora... address, and I was expecting to get it in my gmail mailbox

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to retrieve it :( I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my fedora... address, and I was expecting to get it in my gmail mailbox... But it doesn't seem to work for me ? Maybe an infinite loop ?

CPE Weekly Update - Week of January 17th-22nd

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). We (CPE team) will be joining Fedora Social Hour on Jan 27th. L

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 14:29:07 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > Hi > I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to > my_...@fedoraproject.org > would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? > If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. ? > > I couldn'

Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Hello, please check here : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EmailAliases On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 4:30 PM Alain Vigne wrote: > Hi > I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to > my_...@fedoraproject.org > would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? > If yes, how to en

Build failure in Clementine: I need help

Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass rebuild with the folloing error: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Clementine-0be314337d5bbd6fc7f5c76c31d7b87e37ba3a04/src/core/tagreaderclient.h:29, from /builddir/build/BUILD/Cleme

Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?

Hi I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to my_...@fedoraproject.org would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. ? I couldn't find documentation about this question. Thank you for your explanati

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 23. 11. 21 18:18, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plocate_as_the_default_locate_implementation == Summary == The venerable `mlocate` program is replaced by `plocate` — a compatible reimplementation that is faster and uses less disk space. == Owner == * Name: [[User:

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On 1/21/22 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:30:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 1/21/22 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Yes that works! Are you going to make the change? (For all of the QEMU firmware packages---edk2, openbios, seabios in addition to SLOF---sinc

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:30:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 1/21/22 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Yes that works! > > Are you going to make the change? (For all of the QEMU firmware > packages---edk2, openbios, seabios in addition to SLOF---since you > are at it). However edk2 has

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:50:58AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > I thought I'd solved all my gcc-12-isms in ceph by running --scratch > --arch-override=x86_64 builds, so I tried a full build and ran into this on > aarch64. :-( > > In file included from /usr/include/boost/integer.hpp:20, >

Re: Self Introduction: Chung Chung

Welcome Chung! -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:34 PM Chung Chung wrote: > > Hi All: > > My name is Chung, I work in Red Hat and maintain lab systems for my team. > > I have been doing DevOps/SysAdmin for quite a few years now. I have > done

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:30:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 1/21/22 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Yes that works! > > Are you going to make the change? (For all of the QEMU firmware > packages---edk2, openbios, seabios in addition to SLOF---since you > are at it). I've done it for

Self Introduction: Chung Chung

Hi All: My name is Chung, I work in Red Hat and maintain lab systems for my team. I have been doing DevOps/SysAdmin for quite a few years now. I have done some RPM package build for my group internally and I would like to contribute as a package maintainer. There are some packages we use

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On 1/21/22 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Yes that works! Are you going to make the change? (For all of the QEMU firmware packages---edk2, openbios, seabios in addition to SLOF---since you are at it). Paolo ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists

Re: s390 ruby build failure

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 12:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 21. 01. 22 v 11:35 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:28:18AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21. 01. 22 v 10:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/t

Re: s390 ruby build failure

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 11:35 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:28:18AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21. 01. 22 v 10:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 /usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb

[rpms/perl-SOAP-WSDL] PR #1: Disable using of mod_perl

jplesnik closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-SOAP-WSDL` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Disable using of mod_perl `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SOAP-WSDL/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 10:52 Florian Weimer napsal(a): * Richard W. M. Jones: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Tom Hughes via devel: On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 This seems like a com

Re: s390 ruby build failure

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:28:18AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 21. 01. 22 v 10:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > >Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: > >>https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 > >> > >>/usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb:471:in `try_do': The compiler failed t

Re: s390 ruby build failure

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 06:47:37PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: > >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 > > > >/usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb:471:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an > >executable file. (RuntimeError) > > >

Re: F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 11:23 Pavel Březina napsal(a): On 1/20/22 15:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 20. 01. 22 v 14:53 Pavel Březina napsal(a): On 1/20/22 12:52, Vít Ondruch wrote: I have naive question why these files are not static and in /usr. I mean, I am pretty sure I won't run `authselect select

Re: s390 ruby build failure

Dne 21. 01. 22 v 10:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 /usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb:471:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError) This appears to be a compile

Re: F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 1/20/22 15:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 20. 01. 22 v 14:53 Pavel Březina napsal(a): On 1/20/22 12:52, Vít Ondruch wrote: I have naive question why these files are not static and in /usr. I mean, I am pretty sure I won't run `authselect select --force` or anything similar any time soon. So w

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

* Richard W. M. Jones: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Richard W. M. Jones: >> >> >> Rawhide was changed to call %set_build_flags automatically: >> >> >> >> %set_build_flags for %build, %check, and %install phases >> >>

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > >> Rawhide was changed to call %set_build_flags automatically: > >> > >> %set_build_flags for %build, %check, and %install phases > >>

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email > > > aski

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

* Richard W. M. Jones: >> Rawhide was changed to call %set_build_flags automatically: >> >> %set_build_flags for %build, %check, and %install phases >> > > That looks broken. Sorry, the web page, or the change itself? Thanks,

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:52:07AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Tom Hughes via devel: > >> > >> > On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > > >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide - s390x regression ?

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:55:51 +0100 Remi Collet wrote: > Le 19/01/2022 à 11:53, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:27:44AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > >> Le 14/01/2022 à 15:31, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : > >>> gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. >

Re: GCC 12 no longer understands -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:15:04AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > honggfuzz fails to build in Rawhide with: > > + hfuzz_cc/hfuzz-gcc hello.c -o hello > gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option > '-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp' > gcc: note: valid arguments to '-fsanitize-c

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide - s390x regression ?

Le 19/01/2022 à 11:53, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:27:44AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote: Le 14/01/2022 à 15:31, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. PHP is now FTBFS on s390x only https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/t

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

* Richard W. M. Jones: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Tom Hughes via devel: >> >> > On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 >> >> This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the s

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Tom Hughes via devel: > > > On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 > >> This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches > >> being > >>

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:32:56AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 21/01/2022 09:29, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > >On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >>https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 > >> > >>This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard swit

Re: s390 ruby build failure

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 /usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb:471:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError) This appears to be a compiler problem that only affects ruby builds on s390x.

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220121.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220120.0): ID: 1109861 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:08:35AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 > > This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches being > added by RPM on ppc64le. SLOF itself does not appear to add or adjust > the -mtune fla

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

* Tom Hughes via devel: > On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 >> This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches >> being >> added by RPM on ppc64le. SLOF itself does not appear to add or adjust >> the -

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:29:57AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 > > > >This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches being > >added by RPM on ppc64le. SLOF itself does

Retired: java-wakeonlan

I have retired java-wakeonlan. I don't use this anymore, and it's not installable. --alec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://do

  1   2   >