Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide - s390x regression ?

2022-01-18 Thread Remi Collet
Le 14/01/2022 à 15:31, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : Hi! gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. PHP is now FTBFS on s390x only https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81436437 Any help welcome, Remi P.S. from build.log /builddir/build/BUILD/php-8.1.2/

Re: Remmina orphaned and I would like to take it.

2022-01-18 Thread Philip Wyett
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 19:41 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:39 PM Philip Wyett > wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376 > > > > > > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions > >

Re: Remmina orphaned and I would like to take it.

2022-01-18 Thread Philip Wyett
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:38 +, Philip Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376 > > > > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions > > changed: > > > >What|Removed

Re: Remmina orphaned and I would like to take it.

2022-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:39 PM Philip Wyett wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376 > > > > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions > > changed: > > > >What|Removed

Remmina orphaned and I would like to take it.

2022-01-18 Thread Philip Wyett
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376 > > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions > changed: > >What|Removed |Added > -

Re: F36 Change: Silverblue and Kinoite will have /var on its own Btrfs subvolume (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VarSubvol4SilverblueKinoite > > == Summary == > Silverblue and Kinoite: For new clean automatic (guided) > installations, create a "var" subvolume to be mounted at /var. > > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:

Re: Question on adding a new package to fedora

2022-01-18 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> So far there has been no action on the bug to get it reviewed. > Does it usually take a while to get the review started? Well, the thing is - there isn't really anyone obliged to review package submissions. Almost every single review is done by volunteers, using their free time. > Do I need to

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

2022-01-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:31:05AM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Thank you, this is great! > > Those two seem to contradict each other: > > # If you are a new packager seeking sponsorship via new package or reviews > # please close this > > and > > # If you are a new packager seeking sponsors

Question on adding a new package to fedora

2022-01-18 Thread Philip Cameron
I am working on getting the xtrkcad program into fedora. Using https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_Existing_Contributors/ I have gotten to the point of creating a bug (2040728) for a new package review. I am not sure how the process works going forwar

Re: Big Node.js jump coming to EPEL 7

2022-01-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:21 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Last week, I retired the `nodejs` package from EPEL 7 because it was > (I believed) stuck on Node.js 6.x due to insufficient dependency > support. Apparently, this broke a few things like uglify-js[1], so I > spent today looking into whe

F36 Change: Silverblue and Kinoite will have /var on its own Btrfs subvolume (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VarSubvol4SilverblueKinoite == Summary == Silverblue and Kinoite: For new clean automatic (guided) installations, create a "var" subvolume to be mounted at /var. == Owner == * Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]] * Email: bugzi...@colorremedies.com ==

Re: Packaging my own software?

2022-01-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:31 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > I've got a script for quickly building KVM VMs with libvirt from a > kickstart, and I think others would find this useful. I've put it on > Github, including an RPM spec, and would like to see it in Fedora and > EPEL. > > Is it okay for me to

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

2022-01-18 Thread Leigh Scott
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:30 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Indeed it does, though kernel build is not kernel update. It will be > a good 2 weeks before 5.16 kernels are offered as an official update. > The point is to get more testing on simpledrm, so I plan to keep it on > at least through the fi

Re: Packaging my own software?

2022-01-18 Thread Blaise Pabon
Hi Chris, As someone who aspires to run their homelab on libvirt (I have a lot of hardware available), I know there would be a lot of folks who would appreciate a known-working configuration script. I also aspire to be a Fedora packager someday and I encourage you to look into COPR if you want to

Re: Packaging my own software?

2022-01-18 Thread PGNet Dev
On 1/18/22 14:29, Chris Adams wrote: to make it easier for me to install my own script and dependencies. :) COPR (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/copr/) exists, in part, to scratch that specific itch. Moving eventually to official builds once a COPR build is humming a

Re: Packaging my own software?

2022-01-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 13:29 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > I've got a script for quickly building KVM VMs with libvirt from a > kickstart, and I think others would find this useful. I've put it on > Github, including an RPM spec, and would like to see it in Fedora and > EPEL. > > Is it okay for me t

Packaging my own software?

2022-01-18 Thread Chris Adams
I've got a script for quickly building KVM VMs with libvirt from a kickstart, and I think others would find this useful. I've put it on Github, including an RPM spec, and would like to see it in Fedora and EPEL. Is it okay for me to package my own software, or should I try to recruit someone else

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2022-01-18)

2022-01-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-01-18) === Meeting started by mhroncok at 18:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-18/fesco.2022-01-18-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:13:22PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 14:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 15:10 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 17/01/2022 15:00, Ben Beasley wrote: > > > > dependency “json”: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/iss

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:22:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> On aarch64 I actually got a slightly different error message: > >> > >> ld: criu/pie/restorer.o: in function `lsm_set_label': > >> /drone/src/criu/pie/restorer.c:174: undefined reference to `strlen' > >> > >> L

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jakub Jelinek: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:08:00PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: >> > > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, >>

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:08:00PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, > > > > so that those bugs

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
I pulled a Rawhide container and tried building there via "fedpkg local". When I took the g++ command line and replaced "-flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects" with "-flto=none", the file was compiled without errors. A.FI. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Adrian Reber
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, > > > so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week. > > > > Not sure if

Re: F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 18/01/2022 18:32, Ben Cotton wrote: Authselect state files moved from/var/lib/authselect to /etc/authselect/.state. Why /etc/authselect/.state and not /etc/authselect/state? Dot in front of the name means hidden file/directory. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) __

F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Authselect_Move_State_Files_To_Etc == Summary == Authselect will move several files that are currently stored at /var/lib/authselect to /etc/authselect/.state. This does not affect configuration backup, that will be kept at /var/lib/authselect/backups. The

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 11:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 14:01, Ben Beasley wrote: > >> Skimming through Koschei, here are a sampling of regressions that seem >> to be associated with GCC 12. Some of these are in packages I maintain >> directly; others are via @neuro-sig

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 11:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >>> If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, >>> so that those bugs can be fixe

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-01-18)

2022-01-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-01-18 18:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, > > so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week. > > Not sure if it is a bug, CRIU no longer works with GCC 12. > > CRIU creates somethin

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

2022-01-18 Thread Justin Forbes
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:30 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 6:56 AM edmond pilon > > > These configs are in preparation for an F36 potential feature, and > > were not intended to work flawlessly on F35 or earlier. They were > > backed out from the fedora-5.15 branch as soon as

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Adrian Reber
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be > just those bugfi

Re: Self Introduction: Dorinda Bassey

2022-01-18 Thread Tim Orling
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:49 AM Felipe Borges wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:21 PM Dorinda Bassey wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > My name is Dorinda and I am an Associate software Engineer at Red Hat, > > I'm passionate about software development, contributing to the growth of > communit

Fedora-Rawhide-20220118.n.0 compose check report

2022-01-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 19 of 43 required tests failed, 13 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 93/228 (x86_64), 61/159 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 14:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 15:10 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 17/01/2022 15:00, Ben Beasley wrote: > > > dependency “json”: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/3138 > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041187

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:25 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > PR sent: > https://github.com/intel/intel-graphics-compiler/pull/226 > Thanks! Added a comment to that, works flawlessly! -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Quality Engineer Red Hat ___

Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora

2022-01-18 Thread Mark E. Fuller
Hi Darryl, My emails keep bouncing when I try to write to you directly. I'll try to block off some time in the coming week to take a stab at drafting a package for usbrelay and then get back to you. Looking forward to working with you. In the meantime, please send me a message directly so we

Re: IMA signing questions

2022-01-18 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:44 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > Something else I'm wondering: rpmsign writes those four-byte "keyid" > values to my FILESIGNATURE entries even if I don't have a public cert > at all. How does it do that? I see verify_rpm.py checks the RPM's > keyid values against the final four

[Bug 2038180] Add perl-XML-CommonNS to EPEL 9

2022-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038180 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41088 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038180

RE: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Roberto Sassu via devel
Hi everyone I recently sent to the kernel mailing lists a patch set to support PGP keys and signatures. Other than allowing the appraisal of RPM headers without changes to the building infrastructure, it would also simplify key management for the use cases requiring file or fsverity signatures (n

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

2022-01-18 Thread csomh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-01-19 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open

F36 Change: Ruby on Rails 7.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_7.0 == Summary == Ruby on Rails 7.0 is the latest version of well known web framework written in Ruby. == Owner == * Name: [[User:pvalena| Pavel Valena]], [[User:jprokop| Jarek Prokop]] * Email: pval...@redhat.com, jpro...@redhat.com, ruby-...@

F36 Change: Wayland by Default for SDDM (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForSDDM = Wayland by Default for SDDM = == Summary == Change the default display server mode for SDDM to use a Wayland-based greeter rather than an X11-based one. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa]], [[User:Rdieter|Rex Dieter]], [

F36 Change: MLT-7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F36MLT-7 == Summary == update MLT to version 7.4 (latest version) == Owner == * Name: [[User:sergiomb| Sérgio Basto]] * Email: sergi...@fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == Update of MLT from v6 to v7 breaks the builds, binaries changed the name an

Re: Z architecture support in Fedora Copr

2022-01-18 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:22:02 +0100 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hello maintainers! > > I'm glad to announce that the native s390x builders are now available in > Fedora Copr production. > > Seems everything works, so we also added the 'epel-8-s390x' and 'epel-9-s390x' > chroots. > > Note that the bu

Z architecture support in Fedora Copr

2022-01-18 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hello maintainers! I'm glad to announce that the native s390x builders are now available in Fedora Copr production. Seems everything works, so we also added the 'epel-8-s390x' and 'epel-9-s390x' chroots. Note that the builders are hosted in IBM Cloud, Tokyo, so the connectivity between builder a

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Marc Dionne
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be > just those bug

Re: Workflow and other problems with the Fedora container infrastructure

2022-01-18 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:42:30AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >On Sat, Jan 15, 2022, 6:57 PM Kevin Fenzi <[1]ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:14:19PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > One of the things that has recently happened in the Koji space is the >

Re: Self Introduction: Dorinda Bassey

2022-01-18 Thread Felipe Borges
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:21 PM Dorinda Bassey wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > My name is Dorinda and I am an Associate software Engineer at Red Hat, > I'm passionate about software development, contributing to the growth of > communities and I have > some experience contributing to FOSS projects. >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220118.n.0 changes

2022-01-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220117.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220118.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:23:07AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > The -mabi=ieeelongdouble defaulting gcc is now in the > > f36-build-side-49600 side-tag (gcc -0.5.1.fc36, same as -0.5.fc36 in > > rawhide except for the different ppc64le default ABI). > > is it right, that the attribute appears only

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

2022-01-18 Thread Leigh Scott
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 6:56 AM edmond pilon > These configs are in preparation for an F36 potential feature, and > were not intended to work flawlessly on F35 or earlier. They were > backed out from the fedora-5.15 branch as soon as it was created > because that branch targets stable Fedora.

Re: hiredis soname bump

2022-01-18 Thread Robin Lee
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:53 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:44:57AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:35 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 00:21, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:05 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >

Self Introduction: Dorinda Bassey

2022-01-18 Thread Dorinda Bassey
Hi Everyone, My name is Dorinda and I am an Associate software Engineer at Red Hat, I'm passionate about software development, contributing to the growth of communities and I have some experience contributing to FOSS projects. I am interested in becoming a package maintainer. I learnt how to creat

[Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220118.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2022-01-18 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220118.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 15:53, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > FlexiBLAS is FTBFS in rawhide [1], and upstream has managed to create a MWE > > that doesn't involve FlexiBLAS [2]. So it seems like an issue specific to > > CMake + GCC/GFortran

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 15:53, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > FlexiBLAS is FTBFS in rawhide [1], and upstream has managed to create a MWE > that doesn't involve FlexiBLAS [2]. So it seems like an issue specific to > CMake + GCC/GFortran 12 + CMake's FortranC Interface. Possible regression in > gcc? > > I

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 11:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 11:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Frantisek Zatloukal >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> If there are bugs on the compiler

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 11:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >>> If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, >>> so that those bugs can be fixe

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, >> so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week. >> > > While I was trying to rebu

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 14:01, Ben Beasley wrote: > Skimming through Koschei, here are a sampling of regressions that seem > to be associated with GCC 12. Some of these are in packages I maintain > directly; others are via @neuro-sig. > > With a few exceptions, I have triaged these only to the ext

Re: Clean EVR upgrade between releases no more required?

2022-01-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Mattia Verga via devel: > Il 16/01/22 15:20, Dan Čermák ha scritto: >> Hi Mattia, >> >> Mattia Verga via devel writes: >> >>> In this [1] rpmautospec bug it is claimed that a clean EVR upgrade >>> between Fedora releases is no more required. >> Afaik this should be correct, as dnf system-upgrad

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, > so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week. > While I was trying to rebuild some Intel components, i've encountered this issue, which seems to b

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220118.0 compose check report

2022-01-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220117.0): ID: 1107475 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

2022-01-18 Thread Dan Horák
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 19:27:44 +0100 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:07:08PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > Another important thing I wanted to say is that we'd like to switch > > > ppc64le from the numerically problematic IBM extended long double to > > > IEEE 754 quad long double

Re: hiredis soname bump

2022-01-18 Thread Remi Collet
Le 18/01/2022 à 02:53, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : ok, so I made the sidetag (f36-build-side-49618) and rebuilt things, but of course now there's 4 more erroring packages (I guess due to gcc12?). Any help welcomed. :) php-phpiredis is also broken, but sadly not detected during the build I open a ups

Re: Clean EVR upgrade between releases no more required?

2022-01-18 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 16/01/22 15:20, Dan Čermák ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > Mattia Verga via devel writes: > >> In this [1] rpmautospec bug it is claimed that a clean EVR upgrade >> between Fedora releases is no more required. > Afaik this should be correct, as dnf system-upgrade uses distro-sync > nowadays and wi