On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:56 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:39 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:55 AM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> >
> > > A further quote from the same section of the FHS suggests the use of
> > > /usr/var, which is a locati
Greetings,
By the end of this week I'm planning to update wlroots in rawhide to
0.15 (libwlroots.so.10) and sway to the latest release candidate.
No breakages are expected as wlroots0.14 compatibility package will be
introduced in the same side-tag.
Additionally, I intend to retire wlroots0.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, I received an email from f...@fedoraproject.org with the subject
> line "Fedora Account System: please verify your Bugzilla email
> address". This email has a unique link to accounts.fedoraproject.org.
>
> Based on the
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:02:59PM +0100, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> My name is Lumír and I maintain a few layered container images in
> Fedora/RHEL/upstream related to Python and S2I (source to image) platform -
> namely python3, s2i-core, and s2i-base.
>
> TL;DR: We (maintainers of layere
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220111.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 1/11/22 05:14 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to Fedora
devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, plea
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:53 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 18:15 +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:04 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:58 -0500, Christopher wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Today, I received
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 fro
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:10 PM Arthur Bols wrote:
>
> On 11/01/2022 18:03, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > You want anyone who receives or intercepts those emails to be able to access
> > your account *without* logging in?!?
> How I interpreted it, and how most websites do it, is that the unique
> l
On 1/11/22 13:00, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 5:05:26 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.
>>
>> The gcc 12 is currently under develop
On 1/11/22 01:17 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to Fedora
devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 from th
On 1/11/22 13:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Thread 1 "ruby" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> 0x778a764c in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install
> glibc-2.34.9000-36.fc36.x86_64 gmp-6.2.1-1.fc36.x86_64
> libxcrypt-4.
On 1/10/22 14:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 01. 22 18:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 08. 01. 22 18:09, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 1/8/22 04:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide...
>>
>> -
>>
>> Not
Forgot to include the output log of a direct execution :
[root@fedora lldpd]# python tests/miscellaneous-tests/lldpd-tests.py
test_lldpd_trasmitted_lldp_attributes (__main__.lldpdTests)
verify at the other end of veth received LLDP packets that contains
attibutes (link address, hostname, TTL, syst
Hello,
First off, I'm not in the packagers group myself as of yet, but I've been
working on a PR[1] to update lldpd to a current version.
Long story short, Koji is building successfully[2], but dist-git is
reporting failure on one of the tests[3].
I made sure I can pass the tests locally on a VM
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 18:15 +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:04 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:58 -0500, Christopher wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Today, I received an email from f...@fedoraproject.org with the subject
> > > line "Fedora Ac
I get somewhere:
~~~
$ gdb --args ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb
--extout=.ext -- --disable-gems "./test/runner.rb" --ruby="./miniruby
-I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext --
--disable-gems" --excludes-dir=./test/excludes --name='!/memory_leak/'
Updated few packages which requires by new Starship. There some new modules
required as well. Need help with RR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039465
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 11. 01. 22 19:17, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to Fedora
devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 from t
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 from this COPR [1] and provide me any feedback, p
Hello,
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 5:05:26 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36
>
> == Summary ==
> Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.
>
> The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
> Fedora 36 upon r
Updated 'rust-process_control' and 'rust-versions'. New module required for
'rust-shadow-rs'. Please help with RR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039429
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:04 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:58 -0500, Christopher wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today, I received an email from f...@fedoraproject.org with the subject
> > line "Fedora Account System: please verify your Bugzilla email
> > address". This email has
On 11/01/2022 18:03, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
You want anyone who receives or intercepts those emails to be able to access
your account *without* logging in?!?
How I interpreted it, and how most websites do it, is that the unique
link just verifies the email address (or any other non-critical act
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:58 -0500, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, I received an email from f...@fedoraproject.org with the subject
> line "Fedora Account System: please verify your Bugzilla email
> address". This email has a unique link to accounts.fedoraproject.org.
>
> Based on the context
Hi,
Today, I received an email from f...@fedoraproject.org with the subject
line "Fedora Account System: please verify your Bugzilla email
address". This email has a unique link to accounts.fedoraproject.org.
Based on the context, it seems legitimate. However, I noticed that
clicking the link wil
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220110.0):
ID: 1099384 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220110.0):
ID: 1099368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 11. 01. 22 v 17:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 10. 01. 22 v 18:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 10. 01. 22 v 18:07 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 10. 01. 22 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 01. 22 10:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedo
Add him in CC
2021-12-20 is not long ago (IMO)
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 13:43 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am
> attempting to contact
> Mohamed ElMorabity a.k.a. melmorabity.
>
> Does anyone know how to contact this package mainta
Dne 10. 01. 22 v 18:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 10. 01. 22 v 18:07 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 10. 01. 22 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 01. 22 10:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/pac
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:21:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +, Michael Young wrote:
I have built an update of xen to the 4.16.0 release on rawhide in
the f36-build-side-49362 side tag. This changes mo
This is your reminder that Tuesday 18 January is the deadline for
submitting F36 Self-Contained Change proposals. Note that this
deadline is for putting the proposals into the ChangeReadyForWrangler
category, not for approval or implementation of the proposal.
Since I have your attention, here are
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-01-12 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, at 4:00 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The point was though, that the rpmdb is not at all the only data of this
> kind and so having a dedicated home makes sense.
You mentioned dnf/yum/PackageKit data; there's two kinds of that. One is e.g.
/var/cache/dnf which does *not
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:21:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +, Michael Young wrote:
> > I have built an update of xen to the 4.16.0 release on rawhide in
> > the f36-build-side-49362 side tag. This changes most library
> > versions in the xen-libs pa
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:39 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:55 AM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> > A further quote from the same section of the FHS suggests the use of
> > /usr/var, which is a location we are not currently using in the Fedora
> > Project, but seems like it
In accordance with the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I am attempting
to contact
Mohamed ElMorabity a.k.a. melmorabity.
Does anyone know how to contact this package maintainer?
This is in reference to these open bugs with perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
I'd be happy if the package didn't die and was updated at least from
time to time.
I did an initial configuration based on what I liked and I don't
expect to to change it for months.
I'm personally not looking into the latest features but rather
stability of what I already have.
❯ rpm -qa | grep s
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +, Michael Young wrote:
> I have built an update of xen to the 4.16.0 release on rawhide in
> the f36-build-side-49362 side tag. This changes most library
> versions in the xen-libs package. I believe that the qemu and
> libvirt packages will need to be rebuil
Hello.
My name is Lumír and I maintain a few layered container images in
Fedora/RHEL/upstream related to Python and S2I (source to image)
platform - namely python3, s2i-core, and s2i-base.
TL;DR: We (maintainers of layered container images for languages,
runtimes and databases) are consideri
On 09. 01. 22 11:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 01. 22 10:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side
tag f36-build-side-49314 today.
The previous version remains available as libffi13.1, so failures to build
will not r
On 10. 01. 22 18:41, Dan Čermák wrote:
Otto Urpelainen writes:
Igor Raits kirjoitti 9.1.2022 klo 13.24:
Hello,
I'm interested to hear if there are any users of the `starship'
application here in Fedora that consume it from the repositories.
Please speak up if you do!
I use it, too.
Sam
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:41 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:59:33AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:03 David Cantrell napsal(a):
> >>One of the difficult things with the Fedora abbreviations is that
> >>tokens can have spaces in them. For example, the
As part of updating libportal to 0.5 in rawhide, there was a license
change from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3.
The soname changed from libportal.so.0 to libportal.so.1, and I rebuilt
the following packages:
* epiphany
* gcolor3 (coordinated with fnux)
* gnome-builder
* gnome-todo
If there are any other
On 1/10/22 23:53, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:20 AM David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
== Summary ==
Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
`/
46 matches
Mail list logo
