Hello!
I'm a user of NVIDIA graphic card.
On top of what others said, I add that there is also the nvidia-settings GUI
that does not work on Wayland.
I don't use it personally, but other people can use, for example,
application/game profiles.
It is also something to consider...
Michaël Berte
On 17.12.21 15:31, Jarek Prokop wrote:
Hi,
I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350
I'll take t
On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 03:10:11 PM +0100, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Note this does not takeaway that the classic Xorg server packages
could definitely use some love / use some community co-maintainers.
If xgl-maint isn't going to maintain the packages anymore, orphaning
them is the right thing to
On 12/17/21 11:22 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 17.12.21 16:55, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 17.12.21 16:13, Michael J Gruber wrote:
On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Sorry to pile on but I somehow lost the original e-mail.
"/usr/share/tessconfigs" seems to be missing so output to PDF or tx
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:54 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1]
> and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those
> maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from
> Koschei.
It's been scr
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:55 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
> 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on
> *devel
On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 21:53 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 12. 21 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] and
> > F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those
> > maintained
> > through @neuro-sig, I saw a wa
On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 22:08 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> It turns out that while a couple of packages I care about were actually
> broken by the bump to 3.0, most of them were instead broken by the
> update failing to install on F34[1].
This should be resolved when
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
I’m happy, in principle, to help co-maintain ROCm packages.
However, before becoming a co-maintainer, I always like to take a look
over packages and make sure I’m comfortable with them, i.e.:
- I can reconcile them with packaging guidelines
- I think I can fix most things that are likely to br
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37:16AM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> > Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
> > To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my
> > interest and use of Fedora is purely a perso
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:11:53AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> `trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it
> was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258
>
> Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g.
>
> -
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have
had no response.
His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
https://twitter.com/bpepple
Sorry, I don't use Twitter. If someone wants to reach out
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:50:42AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple.
>
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free has FTBFS in Rawhide for ~1 month. I submitted
> a PR with a fix on Nov 22, but there has been zero response:
>
> https://src.fedorapro
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:50:42 -0500 (EST), Scott Talbert wrote:
> Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have
> had no response.
His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
https://twitter.com/bpepple
_
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 09:55:51PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 16.12.21 00:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On 17.12.21 16:55, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 17.12.21 16:13, Michael J Gruber wrote:
On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Sorry to pile on but I somehow lost the original e-mail.
"/usr/share/tessconfigs" seems to be missing so output to PDF or txt
fails with "read_params_file: Can't open
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple.
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free has FTBFS in Rawhide for ~1 month. I
submitted a PR with a fix on Nov 22, but there has been zero response:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free/pull-request/7
https://bugzilla.re
Volker, thank you very much for maintaining such a huge list of
scientific packages. I am certain lot of people are deeply grateful
for your efforts. I personally know students who use Fedora and
software you've maintained in their studies and post-doc research.
вс, 12 дек. 2021 г. в 23:08, Volke
On 17.12.21 16:13, Michael J Gruber wrote:
On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Sorry to pile on but I somehow lost the original e-mail.
"/usr/share/tessconfigs" seems to be missing so output to PDF or txt
fails with "read_params_file: Can't open txt" or "read_params_file:
Can't open p
> On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Sorry to pile on but I somehow lost the original e-mail.
>
> "/usr/share/tessconfigs" seems to be missing so output to PDF or txt
> fails with "read_params_file: Can't open txt" or "read_params_file:
> Can't open pdf". Standard out works. Issue
Hi,
I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350
Thanks,
Jarek
___
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Note that this replaces the approved Golang 1.17 Change
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.18
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36,
> including the rebuild of all dependent packag
Hi Fabio,
On 12/17/21 12:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent updates to use a standalone xwayland package, the
> "classic" xorg-x11-server package seems to have fallen into disrepair.
> It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11, upstream
> has released 1.20.
*** It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11,
upstream has released 1.20.12, 1.20.13, 1.20.14, 21.1.0, 21.1.1,
21.1.2), and has open CVE issues attached to it. ***
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 12:21 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent updates to use a standa
Hi all,
With the recent updates to use a standalone xwayland package, the
"classic" xorg-x11-server package seems to have fallen into disrepair.
It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11, upstream
has released 1.20.12, 1.20.13, 1.20.14, 21.1.0, 21.1.1, 21.1.2), and
has open CVE i
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 5:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Keylime_subpackaging_and_agent_alternatives
>
> == Summary ==
> The [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keylime keylime] package will
> be split into subpackages per role (agent, registrar, verifier, and
>
> From: Neal Gompa [mailto:ngomp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 11:17 AM
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 5:14 AM Roberto Sassu via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > > In Fedora, we use a new package signing key for each Fedora release.
> > > What key would be used for the fs-verity signatures: the
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 5:14 AM Roberto Sassu via devel
wrote:
>
> > In Fedora, we use a new package signing key for each Fedora release.
> > What key would be used for the fs-verity signatures: the same key,
> > a separate key? Edit: I see that the Change page says a dedicated key is
> > used.
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211216.0):
ID: 1088295 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
29 matches
Mail list logo
