Am 17.12.21 um 02:39 schrieb Jeremy Newton:
Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for a
while and lots of applications use it.
Also I'd be interested in using pytorch (installed via pip) on my AMD system.
Years ago when Tom Stellard started to package roc
Reon,
On 2021-12-17 08:17, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
"Looks a similar ticket was
already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921";
Yes it would be nice to remove firefox-wayland and re-enable the
script for KDE/sway.
+1
P.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
It turns out that while a couple of packages I care about were actually
broken by the bump to 3.0, most of them were instead broken by the
update failing to install on F34[1].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201
On 12/16/21 14:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like python-pyt
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote:
>
> I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really
> appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious:
> are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or
> whic
On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few
hours before the push).
Sorry to pile on but
Yeah I think the technical leads are mostly on board with following FHS as
close as possible, which is an obvious plus for Fedora.
I think the biggest issue is the scale of the problem, and it almost feel likes
they need to work component by component, but [2] will definitely be fixed for
all c
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/46 (x86_64)
ID: 1088228 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088228
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 108819
On 12/12/21 8:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
>> Some more questions about how the verification happens… IIUC, I need to
>> load some keys to the kernel keyring, and then set
>> fs.verity.require_signatures.
>>
>> Where do the keys come from? How are the keys thems
On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DIGLIM
== Summary ==
Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) provides a repository of file
digests from authenticated sources, such as RPM headers, to be used by
kernel services for remote attestation and/or secure boot at
application level.
== Owner ==
* Nam
Note that this replaces the approved Golang 1.17 Change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.18
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if re
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/67 (x86_64), 1/18 (aarch64)
ID: 1084171 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1084171
ID: 1084192 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL
> Hi,
>
> On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:
> I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not
> the most
> comfortable but at least
> I don't have to go to terminal for running firefox.
>
> I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).
>
> I am afraid it is not default
"Looks a similar ticket was
already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921";
Yes it would be nice to remove firefox-wayland and re-enable the script for
KDE/sway.
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On 16.12.21 00:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221
mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative, which is currently FailsToInstall, grew a
dependency on it.
On 16. 12. 21 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] and
F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those maintained
through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from Koschei.
Unfortunately, because packages
For anyone else wondering:
https://rocmdocs.amd.com/en/latest/index.html
AMD ROCm is the first open-source software development platform for
HPC/Hyperscale-class GPU computing. AMD ROCm brings the UNIX
philosophy of choice, minimalism and modular software development to
GPU computing.
It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1]
and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those
maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from
Koschei.
Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major version
On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:
Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that
way.
There has been a recent
Hello!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on
*devel lists, big thanks to everyone for the discussion).
Note that this
Hi all,
`trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it
was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258
Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g.
- for ARM, uboot-tools no longer pulls in vboot-utils which pulls in
trousers:
https://
I maintain the now-deprecated pure-Python “rocm-smi” package, and I’ve
looked a few times at packaging rocm_smi_lib[1] to replace it, but the
kinds of distro-friendliness issues you mention, e.g. [2][3], have so
far been more than I was willing to work around.
I was also partially dissuaded by
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some
> internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS
> compliance, clearer licensing, etc.
>
> Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to
Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that
way.
There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
20 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 97/228 (x86_64), 67/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 8:51:44 AM CST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Among other reasons, this is why I started to use fedora-create-review
> (from the fedora-review package) to submit my Package Review tickets,
> because it checks if a review request for the package already exists,
> before subm
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 05:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > - epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to
> >bootstrap on new EL releases
>
> Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible fo
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel
wrote:
>
> A few months ago, i have open RHBZ#1983762 to include rust-find-crate in
> fedora because i need it for rust-palette_derive. But now it seem to have
> been integrate by another person without mentioning me that my bug was been
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> Hmm. Some interesting stuff going on there but I would have started with a
> new SELinux
> access vector. That'd allow fine-grained constraints, e.g. disallowing
> `init_t` but
> allowing `unconfined_service_t`. Possibly also landlo
It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you.
I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster).
Looks a similar ticket was already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921
On 12/16/21 14:02, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
Hi,
On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command
line forever.
I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most
comfor
Hi,
On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command
line forever.
I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most
comfortable but at least
I don't have to go to t
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a discourse post (or on our
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211216.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 124
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211215.0):
ID: 1087301 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Welcome Evžen!
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 09:13, Benson Muite
wrote:
> On 12/16/21 12:01 PM, evzen...@seznam.cz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic.
> > Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno.
> >
> > I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my
On 12/16/21 12:01 PM, evzen...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hello,
My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic.
Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno.
I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my Bachelor's
thesis. About which am I also writing a blog.
Welcome. MediaWriter is a very
Hello,
My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic.
Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno.
I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my Bachelor's thesis.
About which am I also writing a blog.
I'm using Fedora KDE for 3 years so far.
I've learned about Fedora project f
On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever.
It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you.
Thanks.
--
Martin Stransky
Software Engineer / Red
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211215.0):
ID: 1087117 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
> From: Roberto Sassu via devel [mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:25 AM
> Hi Kevin
>
> I didn't find a link to create a new page. Could it be
> that I don't have edit access? At the bottom of:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
>
> t
On 16/12/2021 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever.
sudo dnf install firefox-wayland
Always use Firefox Wayland shortcut.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Hi Kevin
I didn't find a link to create a new page. Could it be
that I don't have edit access? At the bottom of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
the page says:
Note that you'll need a Fedora account and to be in
at least one Fedora subproject group on that account
to make wik
43 matches
Mail list logo
