On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:
Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest
and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that
way.
There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would
like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.
I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some internal
processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance,
clearer licensing, etc.
Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)
Would you be interested in maintaining the existing packages? I could use
some help keeping them up-to-date with the latest versions.
-Tom
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
