On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:49 PM Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> This spirv-tools-libs build changed the ABI of libSPIRV-Tools.so in
> Rawhide on Nov 23:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1858749
>
> The shared lib has no soversion, and other libs in Fedora depend
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 06th
December (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapr
On 12/5/21 05:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
servers.
...
or the equivalent on the command line:
ssh -o HostKeyAlgorithms=+ssh-rsa -o PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms=+ssh-rsa rhel6
That's also documented in the release notes for 8.8
On 12/5/21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
servers. The error is:
Unable to negotiate with [server] port 22: no matching host key type found.
Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
It seems like the cut-off point is RHEL <= 6 broken, RHEL >
Hello David,
This spirv-tools-libs build changed the ABI of libSPIRV-Tools.so in
Rawhide on Nov 23:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1858749
The shared lib has no soversion, and other libs in Fedora depend on it:
mpv: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libshaderc_shared.so.1:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:15 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
> servers. The error is:
>
> Unable to negotiate with [server] port 22: no matching host key type found.
> Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
>
> It seems like the cut-off po
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 02:36:51PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Enable the use of fsverity for installed RPM files validation.
Can we use this to validate the install media at runtime rather than as a
separate boot step?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 10:51 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> The webkit2gtk3 package has a %add_to_license_files macro that you can
> copy as a workaround, but you might not be satisfied because it
> requires listing each affected file individually
I have no moral issue with listing them indi
Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 14:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Any plans to add EL 9 to the list of test instances?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
>
Could you please put in a ticket to
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue so it can be worked
o
Any plans to add EL 9 to the list of test instances?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
The webkit2gtk3 package has a %add_to_license_files macro that you can
copy as a workaround, but you might not be satisfied because it
requires listing each affected file individually
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/208 (x86_64), 12/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211204.n.1):
ID: 1077470 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: http
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 4:09 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> yes, yesterday.
>
> See the announcement:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5UJSW3FBGQMLXWWV7BGHWZTOFLH4NH3G/
*sigh*. Sorry, I missed it (I think I need to
add yet another mail list to
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 03:27:49AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Now that CentOS Stream 9 is announced as
> available, is there a schedule for when EPEL-9
> branches can be made, and when one can
> (start to) ask others to build for EPEL-9
> (it would be nice if a number of the EPEL-9
> packages
openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
servers. The error is:
Unable to negotiate with [server] port 22: no matching host key type found.
Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
It seems like the cut-off point is RHEL <= 6 broken, RHEL >= 7 is OK.
I eventually found a workaroun
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211204.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211205.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 39
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 802.12 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:10 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> On Friday, 3 December 2021 18:40:12 CET Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
> > On 12/3/21 03:15, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, December 2, 2021 9:07:06 PM CET Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
> > >
> > >> `smallbitvec` deps are only needed fo
Jerry James kirjoitti 19.11.2021 klo 23.49:
To help those who may be new to packaging, I have started documenting some
of my workflows. I have a set of web pages rooted here:
https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/packager/
Those pages contain walk-throughs and examples illustrating ho
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211203.0):
ID: 1077382 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211203.0):
ID: 1077366 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
21 matches
Mail list logo
