Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20210917.n.1 compose check report

g-i-s works again with this compose :) On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 4:28 AM Fedora compose checker < rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 8 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing > openQA tests ma

License change for R-roxygen2: GPLv2 -> MIT

The to-be-built R-roxygen2 7.1.2 release will be MIT instead of GPLv2; this will come to all Fedora releases. -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Fedora-Rawhide-20210917.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MI

[Test-Announce] 2021-09-20 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

# F35 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-09-20 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta freeze exception issue and 7 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time this weekend, you ca

[Test-Announce] 2021-09-20 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-09-20 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a few weeks, so let's get together and check in. If anyone has any other items for

Re: Cached Package Review Tracker

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > It was maimed by the 10-bug default limit in the recent Bugzilla upgrade. It > looks like people are working on it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/review_stats/pull-request/13 > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/review_stats/pull-request/14

Re: Cached Package Review Tracker

It was maimed by the 10-bug default limit in the recent Bugzilla upgrade. It looks like people are working on it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/review_stats/pull-request/13 https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/review_stats/pull-request/14 On Fri, Sep 17, 2021, at 6:12 PM, Jerry James wrote: > What h

Cached Package Review Tracker

What happened to this page? https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ There are only a handful of reviews listed there. What happened to the rest? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:06:05PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Shouldn't we rethink how we provide such packages? I am thinking about > something like providing the compat packages as a subpackages of the > original package? The downside of that is that any change/update will change all the pac

Ipopt-3.14.3 in Rawhide

Hi all. Ipopt-3.14* is ready for Rawhide (release notes: https://github.com/coin-or/Ipopt/releases) Even if it should not be a problem with related dependencies, i will rebuild the packages that need Ipopt: coin-or-Bonmin coin-or-Couenne coin-or-OS coin-or-Dip -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora

FedoraRespin-34-updates-20210917.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live x86_64 Xfce live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/21 (x86_64) ID: 987829 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987829 ID: 987830 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Beta blocker status summary

Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue NEEDINFO: karolherbst 2. freeipa — DNS often stops resolving properly after FreeIPA serve

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:59:36AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 16/09/2021 23:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We could include a meta-package in the default installation, which > > Recommends the Cisco package on GA but is switched to Requires in a > > 0-day update. > > We can't require

Fedora-IoT-35-20210917.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210916.0): ID: 987759 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987759 ID: 987770 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > I wonder if the RH Bugzilla team could synchronize with Fedora schedule next > time, and avoid making potentially disruptive changes during an infra > freeze... > (Yes, I'm still somewhat salty that BlockerBugs App broke during a blocker >

Fedora-35-20210917.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 17/205 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210916.n.0): ID: 987184 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987184 ID: 987190 Test

Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

Welcome! Ankur said pretty much the same things I was going to say. Let me add that you will have to sign the Fedora Project Contributor Agreement (FPCA), which I think takes care of fedora-contributor. I second the suggestion to look at the co-maintainer route, especially since it looks like

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On 17. 09. 21 16:52, Kamil Paral wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:09 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short version is that the search API

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:09 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat > Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short > version is that the search API now defaults to returning 20 bugs, but > authenticated calls can request up

Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 15:28:59 +0100, Eric Curtin wrote: > Hi Guys, Hello, Welcome to Fedora! > When I write to IRC I get: > > "Cannot send to nick/channel" > How can I solve this? I think all Fedora channels require you to be registered with Libera (to prevent spam). You can register here: h

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

Mea-culpa to everyone. On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 10:29, Eric Curtin wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > When I write to IRC I get: > > "Cannot send to nick/channel" > > How can I solve this? > > I would like to get added to the following groups, if possible: > > cla_redhat [OBSOLETE] Red Hat Employees CLA Grou

Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

Hi Guys, When I write to IRC I get: "Cannot send to nick/channel" How can I solve this? I would like to get added to the following groups, if possible: cla_redhat [OBSOLETE] Red Hat Employees CLA Group member fedora-contributor Fedora contributors member fedorabugs Group for granting Bugzilla

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210917.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210916.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210917.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.69 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Introducing ABI changes in libolm

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care > > of? > > I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump. > > Upstream developers decid

[Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Branched 20210917.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 35 Branched 20210917.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

Dne 16. 09. 21 v 15:37 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): Do you want a list of retired components or a list of removed packages? Both are doable with repoquery (use the source repo for components): $ comm -23 <(repoquery --releasever 34 --repo={fedora,updates}-source -a | pkgname | sort | uniq) <(repoque

Re: Introducing ABI changes in libolm

On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote: Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care of? I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump. Upstream developers decided to hide internal symbols from ELF/DLL export tables. I agree that these symbols are p

Changes to Bugzilla query limits

I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short version is that the search API now defaults to returning 20 bugs, but authenticated calls can request up to 1000. More details are on the Community Blog: https://co

Unsolicited kernel 5.15 RC1 feedback

Corrected subject line... On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:26 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > After reading the Phoronic's article about the AMD improvements baked in > the 5.15 kernel I decided to give it a try on my F34 desktop. > > Bootup was OK but after logging in I saw some small screen corruption on >

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

Thanks for this change to finally make Recommends work as expected. It's been needed for a long time. On Thu, Sep 16 2021 at 11:31:40 PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: We could include a meta-package in the default installation, which Recommends the Cisco package on GA but is switched to Require

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 17. 09. 21 v 12:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 17. 09. 21 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote: I like the proposal, but I very much dislike the name (including the configuration option name). I don't have better name at hand, but I think it would be worth of a bit of brainstorming. Change name: Don'

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello all, > > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. > > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. > I haven't

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 17. 09. 21 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote: I like the proposal, but I very much dislike the name (including the configuration option name). I don't have better name at hand, but I think it would be worth of a bit of brainstorming. Change name: Don't reinstall already not installed weak dependenci

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

I like the proposal, but I very much dislike the name (including the configuration option name). I don't have better name at hand, but I think it would be worth of a bit of brainstorming. Vít Dne 16. 09. 21 v 21:17 Ben Cotton napsal(a): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeak

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On pe, 17 syys 2021, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I haven't reported FTBFS bugs righ

Re: Packaging guidelines - clarification required - Users and Groups

Dne 16. 09. 21 v 16:01 Michal Schorm napsal(a): Hello, I seek a clarification on the "Users and Groups Guidelines" [1] chapter of the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines" [2] Please note I want such case to be clear to newcomers too. While I am an experienced packager who has a fair idea how to naviga

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

Dne 16. 09. 21 v 14:19 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report mailto:rawh...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > = ADDED PACKAGES = > Package: atkmm2.36-

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210917.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210916.0): ID: 986856 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Introducing ABI changes in libolm

* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > Hello. > > libolm 3.2.6 introduces ABI changes without a SOVERSION bump. > > Upstream's answer: > >> The purpose of bumping the SOVERSION is so that things that are >> compiled against it don't suddenly break. If we're removing things >> that nobody is using (and nobo

Introducing ABI changes in libolm

Hello. libolm 3.2.6 introduces ABI changes without a SOVERSION bump. Upstream's answer: The purpose of bumping the SOVERSION is so that things that are compiled against it don't suddenly break. If we're removing things that nobody is using (and nobody should ever have used, and people would

Re: Introducing API changes in google-benchmark

On 15/09/2021 15:00, Ben Beasley wrote: I have checked the remaining packages (cctz, geometry-hpp, python-pypet, seqan3, and snappy). Based on source grepping and on a successful “fedpkg mockbuild --enablerepo=local”, none of them uses the part of the API that was changed. All issues should b

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I haven't reported FTBFS bugs right away. As I know many packages have the por

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 16/09/2021 23:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: We could include a meta-package in the default installation, which Recommends the Cisco package on GA but is switched to Requires in a 0-day update. We can't require packages from third-party repositories. This is forbidden by packaging guidelines. L

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 17. 09. 21 9:28, Kamil Paral wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:18 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect == Summary == exclude_from_w

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210917.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210916.0): ID: 986548 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Self Introduction: Jan Baudisch

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:51:17PM +0200, Jan Baudisch wrote: > Hi, > > I am a computer science student from Germany and have used Fedora for > at least 2 years by now. > > Using COPR I gained some experience in buidling packages but recently I > wanted to try building packages conforming to the

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect > > > == Summary == > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak > dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and > blocks installation of