Fedora-Cloud-33-20210305.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210304.0): ID: 800413 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Thanks for your notes. If wanted, the first version of autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package is available in copr for testing. This is a version which is parallelly installable with autoconf-2.71. Please check/update your packages and rebuild them. Thanks. Regards, Ondrej copr: https://copr.fedorainf

Request to include package: coreboot

Preferribly a git version with all packages would be nice Hope this is the right place to put this, if not what list, thanks in advance. https://www.coreboot.org/ Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___ devel mailing list -- deve

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 01:51 +0100, David Kaufmann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:45:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Well, you could still argue it's prettier than a wall-o-text boot. And > > it *does* hide the wall-o-text. > > On the first boot after install that's maybe nice, but usua

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:45:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Well, you could still argue it's prettier than a wall-o-text boot. And > it *does* hide the wall-o-text. On the first boot after install that's maybe nice, but usually when I look at the machine booting I either do need to see why

Re: getting EPEL 9 started [was Re: ELN SIG First Meeting]

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:55:44AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > That would be more or less what Ubuntu universe is doing: branch every > package in Fedora, build it once for EPEL, and then just let it rot unless a > maintainer volunteers to actually maintain it. It might be better than

Re: getting EPEL 9 started [was Re: ELN SIG First Meeting]

Matthew Miller wrote: > I have a couple of packages which I find handy to have in EPEL -- little > command line utilities, mostly -- and which have very little change over > time and which I'm 99.9% will just build on EPEL 9. My EPEL maintenance > policy is basically "build once when there is a new

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

> I think there's probably three things: Great summary Matthew, a big +1 from the peanut gallery. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 22:40 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Starting from a minimal install with plymouth omitted, adding just > > plymouth itself pulls in 3 packages (plymouth, plymouth-core-libs, > > plymouth-scripts) with an installed size of 621K. Adding plymouth- > > system-theme pulls in 3

Re: getting EPEL 9 started [was Re: ELN SIG First Meeting]

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 16:24 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:55PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > In any case, I'm not convinced mass branching is ever going to work > > for > > epel. Although I suppose as more packages have the epel packager > > sig > > group on them, tha

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 16:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:56:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I think we are all using different short hand definitions of what we want > > to happen and are seeing each other skip steps because of that. I am very > > guilty of this wh

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, at 3:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! > > So I've filed a bug recently which may need wider discussion about the > resolution. The bug report is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378 > > The problem is this. If plymouth is installed but no grap

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

Hi, On 3/4/21 9:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! > > So I've filed a bug recently which may need wider discussion about the > resolution. The bug report is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378 > > The problem is this. If plymouth is installed but no graphical theme

Re: stuck update, was Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] ceph-16.1.0-0.4.snapshot.fc34

Fedora 34 is currently in Beta Freeze. It won't go stable until that lifts (or it is approved as a blocker or freeze exception). On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:55 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > This update is now six days old, still hasn't reached stable. > > Would someone please kick it? > > thanks >

getting EPEL 9 started [was Re: ELN SIG First Meeting]

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:55PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In any case, I'm not convinced mass branching is ever going to work for > epel. Although I suppose as more packages have the epel packager sig > group on them, that group could work on faster adding piles of packages. > Perhaps we shou

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:56:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I think we are all using different short hand definitions of what we want > to happen and are seeing each other skip steps because of that. I am very > guilty of this when saying what could happen in this scenario. The > follow

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > If you don't have plymouth installed, you get a very old-school "wall > of text" boot process; if there are encrypted system partitions, you > get a plain text prompt for the encryption passphrase, with no keyboard > layout indicato

stuck update, was Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] ceph-16.1.0-0.4.snapshot.fc34

This update is now six days old, still hasn't reached stable. Would someone please kick it? thanks On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 2:20 PM wrote: > The following comment has been added to the ceph-16.1.0-0.4.snapshot.fc34 > update: > > bodhi - 2021-02-27 19:17:57.406291 (karma: 0) > This update has b

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:43:26PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I have actually been considering doing a Fedora workstation light spin for > > budget x86 machines with 1G / 2G of RAM and an eMMC. > > > I agree and think that a spin would be needed. There is going to be an > audience for i

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

> The problem is that every time this conversation starts... you end up with > 200 people all wanting some other program to be stopped/not run/removed but > not something they actually think is essential. And instead we end up > finding we needed to add one or two things because a lot of users want

Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

Hey folks! So I've filed a bug recently which may need wider discussion about the resolution. The bug report is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378 The problem is this. If plymouth is installed but no graphical theme is installed/configured - which is currently the case for at l

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On rawhide I upgraded to authselect-1.2.2-3.fc35 yet I am still encountering the issue of gdm repeatedly complaining about authentication via fingerprint. I've checked and authselect is using the 'ssd' profile. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 13:50, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, snip > > IIRC a default GNOME workstation install consumes about 700-800MB of RAM > when logged into the desktop on a 1G RAM system. After I've done a bunch of > hacks / tweaks to remove a long list of unnecessary (1) processes I have i

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On 3/4/21 12:55 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 3/3/21 11:02 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 3/2/21 10:21 PM, Ray Strode wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:20 AM Pavel Březina wrote: Can you reiterate the problem? The snippet above don't tell me much. >>> Sorry, let me summarize

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

> Given that I can halve the base processes RAM set with some hacks I > think that it is fair to say that there are still way too much things > starting by default. > > I have actually been considering doing a Fedora workstation light spin > for budget x86 machines with 1G / 2G of RAM and an eMMC.

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On 3/4/21 5:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 11:21, Hans de Goede > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It has very limited functionality by design. If you do not want to use > SSSD, you can keep using sssd profile and just disable th

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 08:38 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > So mainly a package maintainer only worries about what is deployed at > their workplace. And I would guess from the size of unanswered bugs > and other things, some of these maintainers did a one-time build to > get what they wanted a

Fedora Linux 34 Beta blocker review #4

I'm on PTO tomorrow, so you get this a day early! The Go/No-Go meeting is next week. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. dogtag-pki — FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and Rawhide composes — ON_QA ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-263244c071 2.

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 08:54 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:46:52AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > All that said, we could change this and just mass branch everything > > and > > leave it to maintainers to clean up/dead.package/retire things they > > no > > longer wish to ma

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 11:21, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > > It has very limited functionality by design. If you do not want to use > SSSD, you can keep using sssd profile and just disable the service. It will > keep working. The minimal profile is there for users that also want to > remove ss

Fedora-34-20210304.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/126 (aarch64), 10/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210303.n.0): ID: 799454 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/799454 ID: 799455 Test:

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On 3/4/21 11:50 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 3/3/21 6:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 3/2/21 5:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: >>> On 3/2/21 4:25 PM, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, Ahh, okay. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:31 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > sudo authselect se

Fedora-IoT-34-20210304.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210303.0): ID: 799734 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/799734 ID: 799743 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:15 AM Jerry James wrote: > Once that is fixed, haxe should build in Rawhide again. Also, Andy, > I'd like to point out that ocaml-luv is now available in Fedora, so it > should be possible to update to haxe 4.2.x. Regards, I've just fixed it by upgrading haxe to 4.2.1.

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210304.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210303.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210304.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 7 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 16/187 (x86_64), 7/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

Fedora-IoT-35-20210304.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210303.0): ID: 799317 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/799317 ID: 7993

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:00:55PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > […] > > > The purpose here is to make the Fedora project a more welcoming place to > > people who _do_ find those terms unwelcome. That doesn't mean everyone > > does. It means we want to be welcoming and

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210304.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210303.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 27 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 314 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.43 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:02:27AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > It's going to require more than removing the hack due to the following: > > /* Storage for the alternate signal stack. */ > static union > { > char buffer[SIGSTKSZ]; > > /* These other members are for proper alignment. There'

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

I'm going to reach out to glib team. I wished all I had to do is remove their preprocessor code but I don't think it is that simple. I much appreciate your help on this issue. Carol On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:02 AM Carol Bouchard wrote: > It's going to require more than removing the hack due to

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

It's going to require more than removing the hack due to the following: /* Storage for the alternate signal stack. */ static union { char buffer[SIGSTKSZ]; /* These other members are for proper alignment. There's no standard way to guarantee stack alignment, but this seems enough

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:01, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:46:52AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > > > Yes, the idea I had in mind was that each package that currenty has an > > > "epel8" branch would al

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210304.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210303.0): ID: 798935 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On 3/3/21 11:02 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 3/2/21 10:21 PM, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:20 AM Pavel Březina wrote: Can you reiterate the problem? The snippet above don't tell me much. Sorry, let me summarize (but also see Benjamin's email). Right now, if fingerprint auth

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

Thank you. I may very well do that. Carol On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:57 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:13:29PM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > In our code base (restraint), we patch and recompile the m4 code base. > > https://github.com/tar-mirror/gnu-m4 > > In their

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On 3/3/21 6:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 3/2/21 5:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 3/2/21 4:25 PM, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, Ahh, okay. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:31 AM Hans de Goede wrote: sudo authselect select minimal sudo authselect apply-changes Which results in the following /etc/pam.

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:13:29PM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > In our code base (restraint), we patch and recompile the m4 code base. > https://github.com/tar-mirror/gnu-m4 > In their code, they have the following which fails to compile when SIGSTKSZ > < 16384 is interpreted. > This is going to

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210304.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210303.0): ID: 798756 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:15:53AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > I want to run this command: > > > > > > > >bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279

PHP 8 mass rebuild in rawhide

Hi, I start working on PHP 8 for Fedora 35 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php80 Mass rebuild is coming will be run in sidetag "f35-build-side-38222" Will be pushed to rawhide when done, probably next week. If your package need new build, please tell me to avoid using bad buildroot