Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

2021-02-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 08:16 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:27 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. > > > > We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string > > "rawhide" to a numeri

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210211.0 compose check report

2021-02-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210210.0): ID: 774384 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Packages conflict in /usr/lib/.build-id/

2021-02-10 Thread Lumír Balhar
Hello. I'm facing a problem with a conflict between two packages from non-fedora repositories. I'm using vscodium and rememberthemilk apps for a long time but now I cannot update both because there is a conflict in /usr/lib/.build-id/. Error: Transaction test error:   file /usr/lib/.build-id

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

2021-02-10 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:27 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hey, > > I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. > > We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string > "rawhide" to a numeric version: > https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/646 > > Cheers, > Rish

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-02-10 Thread Ondrej Dubaj
Jeff, thank you for your offer, I will gladly use your tester. What information/RPMs/SRPMs do you need from me? Miro, maybe it could be a system-wide change. If you think so, I can change it. About the absolute numbers, as you said, not all FTBFS are necessarily caused by autoconf, but I did not

Fedora-Rawhide-20210210.n.0 compose check report

2021-02-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 11 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 42/183 (x86_64), 30/124 (aarch64

Re: Update on Modular Obsoletes and EOL change

2021-02-10 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Martin, Martin Curlej writes: [snip] > It would be great if we could start a discussion about how modular > obsoletes will be used in Fedora? Where will be they stored? Who will be > able to change them? Just a couple of questions to get the discussion > started. Any involvement of the Fedo

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

2021-02-10 Thread Debarshi Ray
Hey, I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string "rawhide" to a numeric version: https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/646 Cheers, Rishi ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

2021-02-10 Thread Benjamin Beasley
I have picked up cairomm. I might pick up more later, if others do not. Many thanks for your efforts thus far, and best wishes for your health. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

2021-02-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these >> errors: >> >> ... >> /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage > > This is impacting plasma-discover and flatpak, the latter's

Re: git push permission denied

2021-02-10 Thread Todd Zullinger
Tony Breeds wrote: > One annoying gotcha I hit after adding the new key to my agent was that > many places now failed to auth as it tried each key in my agent and > exceeded the MaxAuthTries in sshd The IdentitiesOnly option to ssh is useful for that. From ssh_config(1): Specifies that ssh(1)

glib2 2.67.3-2 seems to cause crashes with pipewire and pulse

2021-02-10 Thread Marius Schwarz
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927491 If 2.67.3 is installed, and audio settings get changed, after a few changes, mostly on the input devices, phosh is crashing. Crashing started 2 days ago, which is exactly the time, that package came on the system. Downgrading glib2 ba

Re: Help wanted: Multiple packages with different ver-rel from one spec

2021-02-10 Thread Josh Stone
On 2/4/21 11:19 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I am aware of at least three (?) other "noteworthy" packages that have > to deal with this (or at least, had to do something like this in the > past): > > - ruby (with the gems that are bundled with the interpreter), > - perl (with the modules that are

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-02-10 Thread Jeff Law
On 2/10/21 11:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 18:47, Ben Cotton wrote: >> == Upgrade/compatibility impact == >> Problems during build can appear in multiple packages what can lead to >> build failure, as multiple packages require autoconf-2.69 as their >> upstream dependency. These pro

Re: git push permission denied

2021-02-10 Thread Cătălin George Feștilă
also, you need to start the sshd service ... systemctl start sshd.service systemctl status sshd.service ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: h

Re: ocamlx() deps changed by mass rebuild

2021-02-10 Thread Jerry James
Since the OCaml 4.12.0 release is near, I thought I would report on a few changes from my previous message. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:08 AM Jerry James wrote: > Thanks for handling the rebuilds. I want to note that there be a few > dragons lurking in wait for the ocaml 4.12.0 release. I maintain

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-02-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 02. 21 18:47, Ben Cotton wrote: == Upgrade/compatibility impact == Problems during build can appear in multiple packages what can lead to build failure, as multiple packages require autoconf-2.69 as their upstream dependency. These problems have to be resolved before adding autoconf-2.71 i

Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-02-10 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 == Summary == Autoconf upgrade from version 2.69 to the last upstream version 2.71 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:odubaj| Ondrej Dubaj]] * Email: odu...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == Upgrading autoconf from version 2.69 to versio

License field corrections: agenda, appeditor, dippi, harvey, notejot, sequeler, gaupol

2021-02-10 Thread Benjamin Beasley
The license for agenda has been corrected from “GPLv3” to “GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for appeditor has been corrected from “LGPLv2+” to “GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for dippi has been corrected from “GPLv3” to “GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > I checked out https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > And in the section "Phase2" I wanted to check out the scripts in > "Release engineering:" sub-section. > Surprisingly (not surprisingly) the links are d

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:19:15PM +, Ian McInerney wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > This is something we ex

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > > > is why there is a main

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

2021-02-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these > errors: > > ... > /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage This is impacting plasma-discover and flatpak, the latter's flatpak.h header will need to fi

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

2021-02-10 Thread Haïkel
Le mer. 10 févr. 2021 à 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : > > Hi, > > In case you didn't see bcotton's mail about pp status, please do. > > Zbyszek I did, it helped deciding to actively reduce the scope. Regards, H. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

2021-02-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, In case you didn't see bcotton's mail about pp status, please do. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject

Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

2021-02-10 Thread Haïkel
Hello, due to long-standing health issues, I'd like to focus on a smaller set of packages and continue mentoring new packagers which helped me to stay afloat during grim times. Here's a list of packages that have no co-maintainers and are required for other projects. - cairomm - gconfmm26 - libgla

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > > is why there is a main → rawhide link, but no master → rawhide link. > > But it could possi

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 17:48 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Yes, you'll need two side tags and build everything twice. f34 and > f35/rawhide are separate now. > I can also use my provenpackager powers to help you with that, if > needed. Hi, okay, thanks a lot. I'll let you know if I face a

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > > I'll create the side tag on Friday, ... > > Hi, > this might be a stupid question, but I'll ask anyway: since there ar

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > I'll create the side tag on Friday, ... Hi, this might be a stupid question, but I'll ask anyway: since there are f34 branches created already, should I create two side tags, o

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

2021-02-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:03:40AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > I'll forward this link to Ben as Fedora Program Manager so he can update the > > termionology in the schedule. > Already done a release or two ago. I guess it was me who didn't notice. :) I suppose it'll catch on more over time. --

Stale provenpackagers to be removed from group

2021-02-10 Thread Ben Cotton
In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should still have provenpackager status.

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-02-10)

2021-02-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-10/fesco.2021-02-10-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-10/fesco.2021-02-10-15.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-10/fesco.2021-02-10-15.00.lo

Re: [F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

2021-02-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 02. 21 16:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: You need a buildroot override, but the bodhi CLI will tell you: "Invalid build.  It must be tagged as either candidate or testing." But the web UI allows it :/ Correction. This part is not true, I had a typo in the build NEVR. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone

Re: [F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

2021-02-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 02. 21 9:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: Hi all, I have started foomatic-db+foomatic chainbuild this morning for F34 and it has been opened for 2 hours till now. Is it expected? IIUC I don't need a buildroot override yet, since F34 hasn't been enabled in bodhi. So the process should be the same

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'll build elementary-calendar + wingpanel-indicator-datetime once > the side tag is ready, if you want. Hi, it'll help, yes. Thanks. > Do you expect any of the listed packages to break because of the > aforementioned API changes

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

2021-02-10 Thread Ben Cotton
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:59 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > I'll forward this link to Ben as Fedora Program Manager so he can update the > termionology in the schedule. > Already done a release or two ago. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=Ameri

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > is why there is a main → rawhide link, but no master → rawhide link. > But it could possibly be done on the HTTP level in pagure, with a redirect? Yeah, if not

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

2021-02-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:41:42AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This has been discussed at lengths and already solved. This is the research scientist's definition of "already solved". :) > Updates-testing Activation > See > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updates-testi

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > Hello, > the upcoming 3.39.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a > soname version bump for its libedataserver-1.2 and libedataserverui-1.2 > libraries due to API and ABI changes. The release is planned for this > Friday. I'l

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ian McInerney wrote: > > I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master > branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide > branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to > spec files

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2021-02-10 Thread Benson Muite
On 2/10/21 5:00 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Joe Orton wrote: In my view it makes sense to drop it from Fedora 35+ and take the pain of disabling functionality until the various upstreams switch to alternatives. Hopefully Remi can comment on alternatives. I guess https://dev.horde.org/im

[heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2021-02-10 Thread Milan Crha
Hello, the upcoming 3.39.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a soname version bump for its libedataserver-1.2 and libedataserverui-1.2 libraries due to API and ABI changes. The release is planned for this Friday. I'll build as many packages as I have commit rights to in a side t

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

2021-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Kofler via devel: > Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> Note that wrapping the header include in an extern declaration violates >> C++ standard requirements. ("A translation unit shall include a header >> only outside of any declaration or definition", [using.headers]/3) > > Yet, it is absolutely

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Ian McInerney
I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to spec files are added in bug reports, and now those links end up on a page cann

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2021-02-10 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Joe Orton wrote: > In my view it makes sense to drop it from Fedora 35+ and take the pain > of disabling functionality until the various upstreams switch to > alternatives. Hopefully Remi can comment on alternatives. I guess https://dev.horde.org/imap_client/ would be the obvious alternative, bu

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

2021-02-10 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Note that wrapping the header include in an extern declaration violates > C++ standard requirements. ("A translation unit shall include a header > only outside of any declaration or definition", [using.headers]/3) Yet, it is absolutely necessary for many C library header

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

2021-02-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29:51 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:19:41PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:18 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I were unable to find time in the schedule, at which the new F35 GPG key > > > would b

Re: mesa 21.0.0-rc3 making rawhide really unstable?

2021-02-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:00 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:17 +1000, David Airlie wrote: > > Has anyone got a backtrace they could put in a bug? I'm not seeing a > > crash with X.org here in my test VMs. > > Hi, > I do not see any crash as such, Xorg simply fails to star

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

2021-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > * Neal Gompa: > >> None of this had to be this way. It is so by our own inaction, not by >> the action of Microsoft. > > I agree. No one but Microsoft stepped up and was willing to control the > key material. > > I still wish we went the way of documenting how to disable Secur

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

2021-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Neal Gompa: > None of this had to be this way. It is so by our own inaction, not by > the action of Microsoft. I agree. No one but Microsoft stepped up and was willing to control the key material. I still wish we went the way of documenting how to disable Secure Boot in commonly used firmware

Fedora-34-20210210.n.1 compose check report

2021-02-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 104/183 (x86_64), 66/124 (aarch64) ID: 772844 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/772844 ID: 772846 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_v

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210210.0 compose check report

2021-02-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210209.0): ID: 773373 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2021-02-10 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi, just note - the functionality has been removed in the recent Vim package for 2 reasons: 1) making it default breaks a default vim alias - vimdiff == vim -d , because diff functionality is not a part of small set of features 'vi' is compiled with 2) making it optional via an environment varia

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210210.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

2021-02-10 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210210.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

2021-02-10 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi all, I have started foomatic-db+foomatic chainbuild this morning for F34 and it has been opened for 2 hours till now. Is it expected? IIUC I don't need a buildroot override yet, since F34 hasn't been enabled in bodhi. So the process should be the same as in rawhide. Does anyone know what's go