[Test-Announce] [Fedora 34] Call for Test Days

2020-10-29 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hi Fedora users, developers and friends! It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 34. For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results, with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users and

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Barry wrote: > After the trauma of the 3.0 release it would be mad to do a python 4.0 for > such a trivial reason as packagers that assumed, wrongly, that version can > only have single digits. And/or codes did character comparisons on version values. I recall

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Barry
> On 29 Oct 2020, at 17:29, José Abílio Matos wrote: > >  > On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs > > yesterday. > > > > Regards, > > Tomáš Hrnčiar > > Thank you for

Re: Announcing rpminspect-1.2

2020-10-29 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:35:19PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Il 27/10/20 18:49, David Cantrell ha scritto: Announcing rpminspect-1.2 Thanks for your work, I find rpminspect a really useful tool! Thank you! Glad you find it useful. Any suggestions for improvements or additional t

Re: Problem signing custom kernel package

2020-10-29 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:13:03 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM stan via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Convert the private key and pem certificate to a pk12 structure. > > openssl pkcs12 -export -out kernel_key.p12 -inkey public_key.pem -in > > xy

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:52:09AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >   > > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of > > having > > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or > > another

Re: Orphaned packages

2020-10-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:20:21AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpwatch > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-guile18 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/environ

Re: GVim issues

2020-10-29 Thread Brandon Nielsen
I have been using it pretty much daily and haven't had any issues. Is this only with F33? I have only just updated my "work" machines. Possibly a misbehaving plugin? On 10/29/20 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Does anybody experience issues with GVim? It happens quite often, that it stops updatin

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >   > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of > having > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or > another company -- or, say, an Apache project want to collectively > maintain packages). >

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:32:39PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Hi Davide! /me waves > Welcome on board the packagers group! > > On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > > [snip] > > Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook > > to

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:07:33PM -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > I've been involved in the Fedora and CentOS communities for a few years > now as part of the Operating Systems team at Facebook, and most > recently helped drive the btrfs by default change proposal for Fedora > 33. Hello

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs > yesterday. > > Regards, > Tomáš Hrnčiar Thank you for doing that, and also for the previous round. But FWIW I still think that it would

Re: Problem signing custom kernel package

2020-10-29 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM stan via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > It's been a while since I did this, so it might have changed, but these > are the steps I went through to create the signing keys. It should at > least give you some hints, if nothing else. > > A lot of wor

Re: Has glibc just removed some symbols?

2020-10-29 Thread Florian Weimer
* Vít Ondruch: > There are possibly still issues. E.g. tracker3-miners is crashing: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892452 SIGSYS indicates that some seccomp sandbox needs fixing. It looks like fstatat, fstatat64 rules are missing. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.r

GVim issues

2020-10-29 Thread Vít Ondruch
Does anybody experience issues with GVim? It happens quite often, that it stops updating the UI. It seems it does something in background (e.g. the mouse cursor is changing and window title updating), but the UI is completely stuck. I am not really sure how to analyze this issue and where to re

Re: Has glibc just removed some symbols?

2020-10-29 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26. 10. 20 v 22:36 Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 08:05 -0600, Jerry James wrote: See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34 OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols __xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found, m

Re: Package Review: github-cli 1.1.0

2020-10-29 Thread Joe Doss
On 10/27/20 10:47 AM, Joe Doss wrote: On 10/27/20 10:11 AM, Joe Doss wrote: On 10/16/20 11:21 AM, Joe Doss wrote: Hello all, Here is the updated package review request for github-cli 1.1.0 ... golang-github-cli-shurcool-graphql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888971 golang-gi

Fedora-Rawhide-20201029.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

Re: Problem with F32 koji build root?

2020-10-29 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 10/29/20 10:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/29/20 9:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: I think this is due to this buildroot override (maintainer cc'd): https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/texlive-base-20200327-16.fc32 I've expired the override, texlive has been built. Thanks

psutils-2.03-1.fc34 license change

2020-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
psutils-2.03-1.fc34 changed a license from (psutils) to (GPLv3+ and psutils). -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:05:53PM -, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs > yesterday. Thanks! Both for doing it and the heads-up :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- de

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201029.n.0 changes

2020-10-29 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201029.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 111 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 28.86 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Tomas Hrnciar
Hello everyone, I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs yesterday. Regards, Tomáš Hrnčiar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Problem with F32 koji build root?

2020-10-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10/29/20 9:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: I think this is due to this buildroot override (maintainer cc'd): https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/texlive-base-20200327-16.fc32 I've expired the override, texlive has been built. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhronco

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python 3 version globs (3.?) with macros to support 3.10

2020-10-29 Thread Tomas Hrnciar
Hello everyone, I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs yesterday. Regards, Tomáš Hrnčiar ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedo

Re: Problem with F32 koji build root?

2020-10-29 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 10/29/20 4:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 19:07, Steven A. Falco wrote: I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets (F31, F33, rawhide are all good). The error is in the tex packages: ERROR: Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/202

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

2020-10-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/29/20 12:43 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> OTOH If the EOL date is informational only (Anna keeps postgresql:9.5 but > >> sees a warning during dnf upgrades) and the obsoletes only actually happen > >> on a specific user action (and on rele

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

2020-10-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10/29/20 12:43 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: OTOH If the EOL date is informational only (Anna keeps postgresql:9.5 but sees a warning during dnf upgrades) and the obsoletes only actually happen on a specific user action (and on release boundary), great. > That's how it is suspposed to work. Read "Pr

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

2020-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:43:05PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > Currently EOL is defined per stream in PDC. The initial value is provided by > packagers with "fedpkg request-branch --sl" command. Then the value can be > edited by relengs based on a ticket. In general, a big +1 to keeping this decent

Re: Orphaned packages

2020-10-29 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 29.10.2020 11:20, Jan Synacek wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/purple-plugin_pack I took this. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

2020-10-29 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 29. 10. 20 v 2:32 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a): Hi Davide! Welcome on board the packagers group! On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: [snip] Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook to try and get more of our OSS software packa

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

2020-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:13:27PM +0100, Martin Curlej wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:53 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > What are the other means which the 3rd parties use? > > > > Your imagination is the limit. ;) Just joking. Now seriously. For example, > Redhat and Fedora. The information about

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

2020-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:02:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This all seem to revolve around the (mysterious) engineering team. Who > "owns" the modular EOL information in Fedora, if not the packagers? IIRC > There is no modularity supervision team in Fedora. The Fedora modularity > issue tracke

Re: Orphaned packages

2020-10-29 Thread Frank Crawford
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 11:20 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them: ... > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/logwatch Thanks for your efforts Jan. Since I'm involved upstream with logwatch, I've taken this on. RegardsFrank ___

Re: Fedora 33 is available now!

2020-10-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:45 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Hello! > > Change of system jdk to java-11-openjdk is an huge change. It should not be > missing in release notes. As it seems it is missing, then just for reminder: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 The release notes section

Re: Orphaned packages

2020-10-29 Thread Daiki Ueno
Jan Synacek writes: > I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them: > [...] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs Thank you for all your effort maintaining that package. As a regular Emacs user I tentatively took it, though I am not sure if I have enough time to spend on that package (I

Re: Fedora 33 is available now!

2020-10-29 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! Change of system jdk to java-11-openjdk is an huge change. It should not be missing in release notes. As it seems it is missing, then just for reminder: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Happy hacking! J. On 10/27/20 2:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I'm happy to announce t

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201029.0 compose check report

2020-10-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-IoT-33-20201029.2 compose check report

2020-10-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201028.0): ID: 709203 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Orphaned packages

2020-10-29 Thread Jan Synacek
I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpwatch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-guile18 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/environment-modules https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-pipes-safe https://sr

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201029.0 compose check report

2020-10-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201027.0): ID: 709202 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: Problem with F32 koji build root?

2020-10-29 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 19:07, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets > (F31, F33, rawhide are all good). > > The error is in the tex packages: > > ERROR: > Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/2028/54442028/local/work/tasks/1779/54441779/k

Re: Fedora Cloud rawhide images not updating?

2020-10-29 Thread Ondrej Mosnacek
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Lubomír Sedlář wrote: > > > > It's very much not obvious. I believe the root cause is that there are > > two raw.xz images for Server on armhfp, which are indistinguishable in > > the metadata. This cau