Re: Announcement: unixODBC - moving unversioned plugins and libraries

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:31 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > announcing moving unversioned libraries from unixODBC main package to > unixODBC-devel package. Also moving unversioned plugins, which are in main > package from %{_libdir} to %{_libdir}/unixODBC according to fedora packaging > standards I'

Announcement: unixODBC - moving unversioned plugins and libraries

Hello, announcing moving unversioned libraries from unixODBC main package to unixODBC-devel package. Also moving unversioned plugins, which are in main package from %{_libdir} to %{_libdir}/unixODBC according to fedora packaging standards [1] So the resolution will look like Main package: %{_lib

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:35 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Brian C. Lane said: > > I tried :) It ends up that there are users who boot the install.img with > > fips=1 which means it needs to be present. It was removed for a bit, and > > then I reverted the removal: > > > > https://g

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

Once upon a time, Brian C. Lane said: > I tried :) It ends up that there are users who boot the install.img with > fips=1 which means it needs to be present. It was removed for a bit, and > then I reverted the removal: > > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/commit/3c745aed8d535cae8430161192e0a1505c21

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:56:26PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Martin Kolman said: > > I wonder if this can also help make the boot isos and installation images > > smaller ? I'm sure they haver some firmware on > > them. Or alternatively we could reduce the potentially quite me

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final is GO

Thanks for a new release to everyone involved. :-) - running it since beta without complains and doing so since the last ~5 releases - --- sixpack13 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists

Re: Dataprotection issue with Thunderbird 78.3+

Am 22.10.20 um 12:02 schrieb Marius Schwarz: > BZ#1890433 > > 21:05  DP issue resolved with thunderbird devs. Thx anyone. Marius Schwarz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On 10/22/20 8:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: I wanted to use chain-build: [python3.9 (master)]$ fedpkg chain-build --target=eln python-pip Could not execute chainbuild: Package python3.9-3.9.0-1.fc34 has already been  built Note: You can skip this check with --skip-nvr-check. See help for more info

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final is GO

The Fedora 33 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will be shipped live on Tuesday, 27 October 2020. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3]. Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release and getting it out on time. [1] https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Miro Hrončok: > > >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were > >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a > >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the >

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On 10/22/20 7:50 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: What is the correct way? $ fedpkg build --target=eln ? Yes. Thank you. I was sure it has been documented already, but apparently we documented everything about buildroot, except this pa

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

Once upon a time, Martin Kolman said: > I wonder if this can also help make the boot isos and installation images > smaller ? I'm sure they haver some firmware on > them. Or alternatively we could reduce the potentially quite meintenance > intensive firmware culling we do at the moment. One thi

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 7:03 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, Miro, > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/22/20 1:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> 3) When I fix breezy, should I resubmit the eln rebuilds of p

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On 10/22/20 7:03 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Miro, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 1:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: 3) When I fix breezy, should I resubmit the eln rebuilds of pip and Python? No. Just submit to Rawhide and the Jenkins job for ELN will take

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Miro Hrončok: >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the >> Default Module Streams setup. > > Should we expect an eln branch

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have it

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

Hi, Miro, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 1:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > 3) When I fix breezy, should I resubmit the eln rebuilds of pip and > Python? > > >>> No. Just submit to Rawhide and the Jenkins job for ELN will take care > >>> of it for yo

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On 10/22/20 1:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: 3) When I fix breezy, should I resubmit the eln rebuilds of pip and Python? No. Just submit to Rawhide and the Jenkins job for ELN will take care of it for you after it succeeds in Rawhide. Python and pip succeeded in rawhide already, this is an ELN-only

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, Vit. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there > >> you have it [1]. So what is the current sta

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > I wonder if this can also help make the boot isos and installation images > smaller ? I'm sure they haver some firmware on > them. Or alternatively we could reduce the potentially quite meintenance > intensive firmware culling we do

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 9:28 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:20:28AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to get the gcc-1

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:20:28AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >> I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to > >> get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debu

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to >> get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debug a bad interaction >> between gcc-11 and a package they can. >> > g

Re: list major languages first in anaconda

On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 08:41 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:28:38AM -, Sundeep Anand wrote: > > Hi, > > > > To help users choose their native language anaconda tries to evaluate > > priority languages based on geolocation and > > place them first in the

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > New GCC releases almost always trigger new compile warnings or bugs > in code. So by pushing GCC 11 into ELN, it feels like we're making > it much more likely that ELN builds will fail, and now Fedora > maintainers have to debug ELN specific problems that won't reproduce

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 16:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware > > > > > > == Summary == > > > Compress Kernel Firmwares to

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to > get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debug a bad interaction > between gcc-11 and a package they can. > gcc-11 was built into a side tag. Each build tar

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Jeff, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:14 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >> Hi, Daniel, > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 22,

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 AM Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > As Fedora maintainer I've been sent details of ELN failures / bugs, and > > asked to deal with fixes for ELN branches, so there's clearly an expectation > > placed on Fedora maintainers to be engag

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:10 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Expectations for Fedora maintainers does not change. > > ELN is a development playground. Think about sidetag, with slightly > > better automation around it. > > > >

Fedora-Rawhide-20201022.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 21 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 91/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

Unresponsive maintainer: pkajaba

Hello, does anyone know how to contact pkajaba, who is main admin of java-comment-preprocessor in fedora ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890573 Thanks, Ondrej ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 8:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> Hi, Daniel, >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, all,

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:06 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? > > > > Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely > > b

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> this is the informational message, no action required. >> >> Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >> switch ELN buildroot to use GC

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, Daniel, > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Hi, all, > > > > > > this is the informational message, no action

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 6:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> this is the informational message, no action required. >> >> Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >> switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of F

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Daniel, On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to >

Fedora-33-20201022.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201021.n.0): ID: 704089 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/704089 ID: 704115 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_log

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 16:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware > > > > == Summary == > > Compress Kernel Firmwares to reduce on disk size > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:pbrobins

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201022.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201022.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 66 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 37.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:02 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:54 PM Neal Gompa > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > mailto:al...@bookwar.info>> wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational message

Announcement: orphaning java-comment-preprocessor

Hello, as no more package depends anymore on java-comment-preprocessor and we are unable to update this package to the latest upstream version due to missing dependencies, we are orphaning it. If someone has any concerns, please share them with us. Thanks, Ondrej

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? > > Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely > broken version of GCC, full of regressions. > > As a Fedora maintaine

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? You were asking for a branch to overcome the issue w

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 22.10.2020 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: Why are you not just doing this in Rawhide? Finally they made the right decision. F32 was built by a completely broken version of GCC, full of regressions. As a Fedora maintainer, I don't want to be a GCC alpha tester again, even in Rawhide. Release ca

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > > switch ELN buildroot to

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is define

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201022.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20201021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201022.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the b

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there > you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? You were asking for a branch to overcome the issue with building a package in ELN. And we have a

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 16:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware > > == Summary == > Compress Kernel Firmwares to reduce on disk size > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]] > * Email: [mailto:pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org|

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you have it [1]. So what is the current stance on this topic? Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/commits/eln Dne 22. 10. 20 v 14:27 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): Hi, all, this is the informational message

[ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi, all, this is the informational message, no action required. Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. Though ELN is defined as the buildroot where Fedora Rawhide code is rebuilt into EL-like environment, in

Re: [ELN] Missing /usr/bin/bzr in ELN (solved, but open questions)

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 01:46, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10/21/20 10:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:00 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > >> 1) Why is breezy not in the ELN compose, but is in the Koji buildroot? > > > > It's defined as a buildroot only package: > > > https://github

soname bump: libnotcurses

The new libnotcurses 2.0.0 bumps the SONAME, reflecting the fact that this is the first Notcurses release committing to a stable API. The only reverse deps of notcurses is Growlight, which I also maintain, and have rebuilt. Since the previous versions of Notcurses were rapidly evolving, I doubt a

odd behaviour for copr builds and openmpi

This will presumably also affect Fedora, but need to recheck. We are experiencing some very odd build behaviour using copr to compile for various Fedora and CentOS/RedHat versions (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/openfoam/openfoam). The built package on centos8 is automatically given t

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201022.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Dataprotection issue with Thunderbird 78.3+

BZ#1890433 Hi, As some noticed, Mozilla devs changed the prefs of TB and while they are on it, forced all 78.3+ to enable telemetric data transmission as per OPT-OUT.  Part of the transmission is the domainname of any mailaccount present in this installation. As domainnames can be AND ARE! first

Re: list major languages first in anaconda

On 22.10.20 10:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Also, I think we should go by the *total* number of speakers, not just the > speakers > for whom the language is the *first* language. My thinking (and I would love > to hear from people who are in this situation) is that many parts of the wo

Re: list major languages first in anaconda

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:28:38AM -, Sundeep Anand wrote: > Hi, > > To help users choose their native language anaconda tries to evaluate > priority languages based on geolocation and place them first in the list. > Proposal[1] is to broad this scope by appending major/common speaking > la

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:46:14PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:41 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wik

digital marketing course institute in delhi

DG Royals is the best Digital Marketing institute in Delhi NCR which provides the best training on digital marketing institute In Delhi dgroyals is https://www.dgroyals.com/digital-marketing-course-institute-delhi/?utm_source=backlink&utm_medium=nikhil";> digital marketing course in Delhi ___

[Bug 1890417] amavisd-new-snmp can't be installed on EL8 because of dropped net-snmp-perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890417 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Doc Type|---