* Steve Dickson:
> About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
> and had them return an error if called.
> No one has complained...
>
> This time I would like to remove interfaces
> so there will be no support whatsoever to
> pass some upcoming audits...
Are you sure this is necessary? If ther
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:21:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
> and had them return an error if called.
> No one has complained...
>
> This time I would like to remove interfaces
> so there will be no support whatsoever to
> pass some up
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64)
ID: 701335 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701335
ID: 701345 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701345
Arnoldas Skinderis writes:
I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those machines
still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would pretty much force me
to use something else.
I don't want to lose Fedora.
Ditto. My Thinkpad W520 is the best damn Fedora laptop. Ever
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On 10/19/20 11:33 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I guess those machines are more or less the cut-off point and slower machines
are not worth keeping around. But that means that there still are a ton
of BIOS machines worth keeping around.
Note that even most sandy bridge machines do not support UEFI an
Hi,
On 10/19/20 6:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every 18months
> it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with more
> cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU power
> has increased
> >> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
> >
> > That's great news. Thank you!
> I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
> so good on Fedora.
How do you mean, it's supported quite well IMO with support for things
like secure boot and UEFI cap
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:46 PM Damian Ivanov wrote:
>
> >> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
> >
> > That's great news. Thank you!
> I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
> so good on Fedora.
> Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use ef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882958
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-20
>> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
>
> That's great news. Thank you!
I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
so good on Fedora.
Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool
installed to the MBR which emulates EFI
and than
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870861
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-20
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis
> wrote:
> > I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those
> > machines still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would
> > pretty much force me to use somethin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis
wrote:
I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those
machines still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would
pretty much force me to use something else.
I don't want to lose Fedora.
This proposal was soundly reject
Hello,
About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
and had them return an error if called.
No one has complained...
This time I would like to remove interfaces
so there will be no support whatsoever to
pass some upcoming audits...
This means I will need to change the SONAME for
libtirpc whic
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:48 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 02:15, Subsentient
> wrote:
>
>> I figure I'll add my two cents for as little as that's worth.
>>
>> Personally, I use extlinux with a custom, barebones configuration. On my
>> EFI systems, I use syslinux EF
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 02:15, Subsentient wrote:
> I figure I'll add my two cents for as little as that's worth.
>
> Personally, I use extlinux with a custom, barebones configuration. On my
> EFI systems, I use syslinux EFI. I like the simplicity of syntax for
> syslinux's configuration and how s
Big thanks, these were very helpful.
If anyone's interested, here are the bodhi updates for the packages:
- copydeps: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6b5ea5655a
- desed: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bbc06105dd
A.FI.
__
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201016.0):
ID: 700991 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201018.n.0):
ID: 700715 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20201019.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:53:28AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - strace is newer in 32 than in 33:
> 0:5.8-1.fc32 > 0:5.7.0.6.7ab6-1.fc33
FWIW, the 5.9-1 version is available (but not in stable).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.
OLD: Fedora-33-20201018.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201019.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201018.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201019.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hi,
perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple was previously tagged as Public Domain,
but upstream added a LICENSE file to 1.26 release, so I changed the
License tag to BSD accordingly.
Regards,
Xavier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 700314 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700314
Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting today at
1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public
meeting, and open for everyone to attend.
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also
32 matches
Mail list logo
