On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:30 PM Carl George wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for fedpop, in accordance with
> policy [0]. I submitted a pull request for the mumble package last month
> that has not been answered [1]. Merging this pull request would resolve
> s
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Several updates are stuck in testing -> stable, I'm going to guess
> because of Beta Freeze(?) which ends Sep 29th.
>
> Still another week to wait. Is it possible to get updates in sooner?
> I'm especially concerned for which several oth
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/181 (x86_64)
ID: 674199 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674199
ID: 674247 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests
Howdy folks,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for fedpop, in accordance with
policy [0]. I submitted a pull request for the mumble package last month
that has not been answered [1]. Merging this pull request would resolve
several bugs [2][3][4], one of which is for a moderate CVE [4].
Several updates are stuck in testing -> stable, I'm going to guess
because of Beta Freeze(?) which ends Sep 29th.
Still another week to wait. Is it possible to get updates in sooner?
I'm especially concerned for which several other builds are waiting on:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 9:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 21. 09. 20 15:40, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I couldn't build elfutils because of an annobin bug that showed up on
> > ppc64le. Nick was nice enough to fix it and push a new annobin version:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/up
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:45:07AM -0300, Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
> I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG.
Cool! Once this is ready and active, see this for getting the SIG officially
documented:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/procedures/team_directory/
--
Matthew
On 07. 07. 20 21:16, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_13
== Summary ==
Update of PostgreSQL (`postgresql` and `libpq` components) in Fedora
from version 12 to version 13 in the non-modular (main) builds.
Hello Patrik.
Is PostgreSQL 13 considered for Fedora 3
On 22. 09. 20 10:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 09. 20 23:48, Dan Čermák wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
winetricks orphan, raphgro, tc01 0 weeks ago
Any particular reason why winetricks got orphaned?
I think the maintainer (ekulik) orphaned it.
https://lis
Il 22/09/20 16:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
>
>> lsun is main admin of rpms/rshim
>> lsun has a bugzilla override on rpms/rshim
> The situation has been fixed for ekulik and imcleod but I've had no news from
> lsun.
>
> Would someone know how to contact them?
>
>
They're the upstream develope
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Since September 5th, we have been emailing daily the following users to notify
> that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla
> account.
> This is a requirement for Fedor
Dne 22. 09. 20 v 10:47 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 22. 09. 20 10:29, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>> Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
>>>
>>>
>>> No, please not! It is just build dependency. I have orphaned the
>>> package
>>> to have it removed from Fedora. May be I should have ret
Danishka Navin writes:
> I would like to join as user.
Me too!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
I would like to join as user.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:15 AM Breno Brand Fernandes
wrote:
> I would like to be part too :)
>
> - Breno
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 11:46, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 20:25:18 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at
On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 1:07:07 PM CEST Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:40 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> > > I hit that two week ago for bitbucket and other servers. In my case I got
> > > it
> > > connecting to lyx git server. At the time I wrote about it in the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:40 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I hit that two week ago for bitbucket and other servers. In my case I got it
> > connecting to lyx git server. At the time I wrote about it in the
> > fedora-test
> > mailing list.
> >
> > My workaround solution was to add to ~/.ssh/config
Frantisek Zatloukal writes:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020, 23:59 Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>
>> Miro Hrončok writes:
>>
>> > winetricksorphan, raphgro, tc010
>> weeks ago
>>
>> Any particular reason why winetricks got orphaned?
>>
>
> Taken.
Thank you!
signature.asc
De
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020, 23:59 Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> > winetricksorphan, raphgro, tc010
> weeks ago
>
> Any particular reason why winetricks got orphaned?
>
Taken.
>
___
devel mailing list -- de
On 22.09.20 10:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> That has changed in the last hour, after the bugzilla has been opened [0].
> Glad to see the status in our systems now match the (sad) reality:
> at least if there are ppl interested in it, they could step up.
I took it, I'll work on getting it updated to
On 22. 09. 20 10:29, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
No, please not! It is just build dependency. I have orphaned the package
to have it removed from Fedora. May be I should have retire it instead,
but I wanted to give change if somebody have some real
> Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
>
>
> No, please not! It is just build dependency. I have orphaned the package
> to have it removed from Fedora. May be I should have retire it instead,
> but I wanted to give change if somebody have some real reason to have it
> in Fedora.
>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 09:42, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> if you take a look at [3], you see the package is orphaned, and I would
> assume, (a) it is free to take and (b) the former maintainer has either
> no time or no interest anymore.
>
That has changed in the last hour, after the bugzilla has be
On 21. 09. 20 23:48, Dan Čermák wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
winetricksorphan, raphgro, tc010 weeks ago
Any particular reason why winetricks got orphaned?
I think the maintainer (ekulik) orphaned it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
>> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>> https://fedorapro
On 22/09/2020 09:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> Hi,
> is anyone in contact with Gratien D'Haese?
>
> I'm opening this thread and this bugzilla[0] as per policy [1].
>
> I've noticed that on Fedora `rear` package is stuck at 2.4, while
> upstream released rear 2.6 [2].
>
> Also you can see there
Hi,
is anyone in contact with Gratien D'Haese?
I'm opening this thread and this bugzilla[0] as per policy [1].
I've noticed that on Fedora `rear` package is stuck at 2.4, while upstream
released rear 2.6 [2].
Also you can see there's no interaction since 24 months at least from the
official
27 matches
Mail list logo
