Dne 22. 09. 20 v 10:47 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 22. 09. 20 10:29, Michael J Gruber wrote: >>> Dne 21. 09. 20 v 18:37 Michael J Gruber napsal(a): >>> >>> >>> No, please not! It is just build dependency. I have orphaned the >>> package >>> to have it removed from Fedora. May be I should have retire it instead, >>> but I wanted to give change if somebody have some real reason to >>> have it >>> in Fedora. >>> >>> >>> Vít >> >> Well, "just a build dependency" means it makes other packages FTBFS.
It does not. At least not immediately. >> Often, noone notices that until the mass rebuild shortly before a >> release beta. >> >> I've already built and pushed it to avoid these problems at the worst >> possible time. It's merely a matter of adjusting the expected test >> output to the new ruby minor version (which has changed strings). And >> my plan is still to retire it, but not without filling bugs for the >> dependent packages before so that they get a chance to switch to >> erubi (no "s"). > > That is just rubygem-asciidoctor with this PR: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/pull-request/4 > > No Bugzillas are needed. > Yes, I have tried to make sure everything is fixed prior orphaning rubygem-erubis. You can check F32 dependencies vs Rawide. The rubygem-asciidoctor is the only one which was recently without response and I expect that Todd was just busy recently, but I have no doubts this would be resolved prior it become issue. Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
