Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

# authselect apply-changes [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content! [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected. [error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed or overwrite is requested. Some unexpected changes to the configuration we

Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

# authselect apply-changes [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content! [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected. [error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed or overwrite is requested. Some unexpected changes to the configuration wer

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 8:28:20 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma > > == Summary == > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. > > == Owner == > * N

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-09-10 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-09-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2020-09-10 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-09-10 1

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:43 AM Alexander Scheel wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jerry James wrote: (snip) > > For those who are willing to help out, is > > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig/issues the place to go to figure out > > what needs to be done? Is there any kind of TODO lis

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On 10. 09. 20 0:25, Jerry James wrote: For those who are willing to help out, is https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig/issues the place to go to figure out what needs to be done? Is there any kind of TODO list or wishlist elsewhere? There is also: https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/java-maint-

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:19 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > However! This has mostly been a one-man-show, with regular > > contributions by Mat Booth (whos thankless task is maintaining the > > Eclipse stack) and the Dogtag PKI team (thanks guys

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:19 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > However! This has mostly been a one-man-show, with regular > contributions by Mat Booth (whos thankless task is maintaining the > Eclipse stack) and the Dogtag PKI team (thanks guys!), who have lately > been busy doing other things (fixing bl

Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

On 09. 09. 20 23:20, Troy Dawson wrote: It was a bit of a race condition. The automatic eln rebuilder got stuck, I'm not positive of the reason. But when it was restarted, it went through all of the package builds that it had missed, and built them. I'm not positive why, but if you look at the st

Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the > > > latest > > > ELN rele

Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest > > ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora. > > > > I've assumed the build has fail

Orca - Fedora Freedom and Independence for the Blind

Hello. Could someone involved in this topic have a look to this post on Ask Fedora? Thanks, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest > ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora. > > I've assumed the build has failed, but it succeeded: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/bu

[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

Due to outstanding unresolved blockers, there is no release candidate for Fedora 33 Beta yet. I am cancelling tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting. The Release Readiness meeting *will be held* as scheduled[1]. Please update the Release Readiness wiki page[2] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We wil

Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:08 pm, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Then, fix /etc/resolv.conf: # rm /etc/resolv.conf # ln -s ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf Sigh, sorry. Fixed instructions: # rm /etc/resolv.conf # ln -s ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf It should look l

Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

Hi, I've you've installed or upgraded to Fedora 33 (or to rawhide) prior to today, your /etc/nsswitch and /etc/resolv.conf are probably in a broken state that requires manual intervention to resolve. This has caused breakage for mDNS and VPN users [1][2][3]. Apologies for this breakage. Anyon

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Hello! Me having this issue also. But only in firefox and thunderbird, other appls seems to work. Do you have a link, bugzilla or so? Thank you Best Regrads Christoph Am 09.09.20 um 16:51 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: On 08.09.2020 17:28, Ben Cotton wrote: Change the default session sel

[ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

Hello. I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora. I've assumed the build has failed, but it succeeded: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1592756 Except it it not tagged to eln. I've located the

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

> KDE > spin is a blocker edition, so its default installation must pass our > release criterias. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria Right, but have there been any investigations to see if those release criteria are fulfilled on Plasma + Wayland? If it doesn't currently meet

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:33 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Björn Persson wrote: > >> Guido Aulisi wrote: >> > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software >> directly from upstream. >> > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted

Fedora-IoT-33-20200909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200908.0): ID: 660209 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On 08.09.2020 17:28, Ben Cotton wrote: > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. KDE Plasma from F32 on Wayland has a major issue with broken keyboard layout indicator. This issue need to be fixed first before ma

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-09)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-09/fesco.2020-09-09-14.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-09/fesco.2020-09-09-14.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-09/fesco.2020-09-09-14.00.lo

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:33 AM Dominique Martinet wrote: > Neal Becker wrote on Wed, Sep 09, 2020: > > I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all > > working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 > > when I try to share an app window (which

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Neal Becker wrote on Wed, Sep 09, 2020: > I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all > working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 > when I try to share an app window (which is my usual choice) there are no > problems, but on wayland only so

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Björn Persson wrote: > Guido Aulisi wrote: > > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software > directly from upstream. > > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted source, and Java users > are smart enough to manage the Java packages.

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:09 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all > working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 > when I > try to share an app window (which is my usual choice) there are no problems, > but

Fedora-33-20200909.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200908.n.0): ID: 659717 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/659717 ID: 659792 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_lo

Re: Removing a branch created by mistake

Il giorno mer, 09/09/2020 alle 15.57 +0200, Jun Aruga ha scritto: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:28 PM Mikolaj Izdebski > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > > Yesterday I created the "wip/2.7" branch on modules/ruby dist-git > > > repository by mistake. ;-< > > > https://s

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 when I try to share an app window (which is my usual choice) there are no problems, but on wayland only some of the windows are given as choices to share.

Re: Removing a branch created by mistake

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:28 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > > > Yesterday I created the "wip/2.7" branch on modules/ruby dist-git > > repository by mistake. ;-< > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby/branches > > > > I remember the curren

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

* Fabio Valentini [09/09/2020 00:19] : > > Can we please increase the bus / lottery > factor (= 1) for Java package maintenance in fedora? I know that at least one distribution bases its Java stack on Fedora's. Perhaps someonce could contact their maintainers and encou

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:30:54 AM WEST Tom Seewald wrote: > Has anyone compiled a (non-exhaustive) list of known issues that are > specific to KDE Plasma with Wayland? https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers -- José Abílio___ deve

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

Guido Aulisi wrote: > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software > directly from upstream. > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted source, and Java users are > smart enough to manage the Java packages. > I usuali do so when using maven, hadoop, tomcat, etc.

Re: Removing a branch created by mistake

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > Yesterday I created the "wip/2.7" branch on modules/ruby dist-git > repository by mistake. ;-< > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby/branches > > I remember the current rule is we can not remove the branch we created, right? The branch ca

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200909.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200909.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 9 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:51.68 KiB Size of

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

20/9/9 05:30(e)an, Tom Seewald igorleak idatzi zuen: > Has anyone compiled a (non-exhaustive) list of known issues that are specific > to KDE Plasma with Wayland? Are there currently any issues that would block > Wayland from becoming the default if they aren't resolved in time for F34? KDE sp

Removing a branch created by mistake

Yesterday I created the "wip/2.7" branch on modules/ruby dist-git repository by mistake. ;-< https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby/branches I remember the current rule is we can not remove the branch we created, right? Jun -- Jun | He - His - Him ___

Re: /etc/localtime is not a symlink on koji?

Dne 08. 09. 20 v 10:51 Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> I'm debugging an issue in a FTBFS, which appears caused by unexpected >> warnings during a build [1]. These warnings come from R and complain >> that /etc/localtime is not a symlink. > I hit this issue many years ago and tzdata maintainer claimed > <

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:30 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:35:11PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: > > Does it now have support for custom keymappings? That is, does it > > have a way to set a user keymap as the default? X has a very mature > > system for setting this, so

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

Hi, > > That's my bad, I reviewed this and that looked good to me, but yeah > maybe the wording could have been better even though CPE is part of > Fedora afaik. >   > Yep, CPE is part of Fedora, but Fedora is not part of CPE, and has its own change decission process. So my statement continues

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 10:30, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > > 20/9/4 17:27(e)an, Aoife Moloney igorleak idatzi zuen: > > > > > - A discussion on forum.gitlab.com at: > > > https://forum.gitlab.com/t/fedora-migration-to-gitlab-ask-me-anything-ama-thursday-september-10-2020/41971 > > > > Er, The T

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

> Am 09.09.2020 um 11:28 schrieb Guido Aulisi : > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software > directly from upstream. > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted source, and Java users are > smart enough to manage the Java packages. > I usuali do so when usin

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200908.0): ID: 659316 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

Hi, > Il giorno 9 set 2020, alle ore 00:19, Fabio Valentini > ha scritto: > > Hi everybody, > > So, after some recent FESCo decisions (no default module streams in > fedora, new Module Policy for fedora and ELN modules), it's time to > ask this question again: > > What's the future of the Jav

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-09)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-09-09 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 9/7/20 9:57 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: container-exception-logger abrt-sig, ekulik, mmarusak,  2 weeks ago   msuchy, orphan satyr abrt-sig, ekulik, mgrabovs, 2 weeks ago parent Hi, I'm taking these two. -- Michal Fabík Associate

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

20/9/4 17:27(e)an, Aoife Moloney igorleak idatzi zuen: > > - A discussion on forum.gitlab.com at: > https://forum.gitlab.com/t/fedora-migration-to-gitlab-ask-me-anything-ama-thursday-september-10-2020/41971 > Er, The Tell me more part on that post says: "On March 27, 2020, Fedora announced it

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 5:32:30 PM WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Please no, KWin Wayland makes my system crash as soon as I connect my second > screen, and does not support essential functions like Kwin scripting, make > Yakuake look terrible and the whole stuff feels buggy as hell. > Ev

Re: F34 Change proposal: Remove support for SELinux runtime disable (System-Wide Change)

Generally, I would appreciate if the proposal was more readable to casual Fedora user/developer. I don't think there is clearly described the current state and what is going to be changed. Also, there is a lot of unclear terminology, e.g. I don't have idea what are "LSM hooks". "Migrate users to us

Re: Gitlab Ask Me Anything - Sept 10th, 13:30 UTC

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Good Morning folks, > > As you likely remember, a little while ago now, was announced the decision to > move dist-git to a gitlab instance. This decision was the results of different > factors which included a wish for Red Hat to hav

Re: noarch packages only for some architecture composes

On Tuesday, 08 September 2020 at 23:55, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 13:15 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer > > wrote: > > > Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the > > > composes? > > > > ... > > I don