On 09. 09. 20 23:20, Troy Dawson wrote:
It was a bit of a race condition.
The automatic eln rebuilder got stuck, I'm not positive of the reason.
But when it was restarted, it went through all of the package builds
that it had missed, and built them.
I'm not positive why, but if you look at the start times of the
builds, python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-1.eln103 was started AFTER
python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-2.eln103.  By one minute.

python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-1.eln103:
Started         Fri, 14 Aug 2020 03:55:13 UTC
Completed       Fri, 14 Aug 2020 05:50:57 UTC

python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-2.eln103:
Started         Fri, 14 Aug 2020 03:54:54 UTC
Completed       Fri, 14 Aug 2020 06:12:13 UTC

Indeed, started first, even the buildID is lower.
I somehow missed that, in the original email I claim that:

however there is no "more recent" (more recently started or more recently
completed) build of python3.9 in Koji

And that was incorrect. Sorry about that.

Since ...rc1-2 was started before ...rc1-1, bodhi assumed that the one
that started it's build last, was supposed to be the one that gets
merged.
Anyway, bodhi was just doing it's job, and it did it correctly.
I think we need to look at our automation and when it get's stuck,
make sure the backed up builds it does are in build order.

Right, that should do it. Considering the builds would not wait for each other to be visible in the buildroot anyway (unless the automation is that clever), even skipping the older builds in such situation might work (and save some resources).

Side note.  I've manually tagged the new one into ELN.

Thanks.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to