* John M. Harris, Jr.:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:19:15 AM MST Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * John M. Harris, Jr.:
>>
>>
>> > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge
>> > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS
>> > servers when n
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 11:11 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 22:09:57 -0600,
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >You're using net installer? The Live doesn't have user configuration
> >in the installer.
>
> I did som
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 22:09:57 -0600,
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
You're using net installer? The Live doesn't have user configuration
in the installer.
I did some live installs last week of rawhide and was able to create one
user accoun
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> > criterion
On 2020-09-02 11:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:51 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
On 2020-09-02 11:06, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:29:44 PM MST Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is
>>> this a F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch:
>
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:29:44 PM MST Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is
> > this a F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch:
>
>
> Is your system an upgrade of an earlier ve
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:51 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Michael,
> >
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf.
> >
> >
> > You're wasting everyone'
On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is this
> a
> F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch:
Is your system an upgrade of an earlier version?
In my case I have an F32 system which has been around for a few year
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:19:15 AM MST Florian Weimer wrote:
> * John M. Harris, Jr.:
>
>
> > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge
> > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS
> > servers when none are configured? If no DNS se
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:22:49 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:17 am, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
>
> > Hiding it inside yet another systemd structure without following the
> > existing standards is, sadly, typical of systemd. It also puts at risk
> > restricted
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf.
>
>
> You're wasting everyone's time with these low-effort spam posts.
I don't see how this could possib
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
> setup
On 01. 09. 20 23:32, Tony Asleson wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:29 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote:
A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream
release and exists in rawhide repo.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.
On 9/1/20 12:29 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
> On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote:
>>> A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream
>>> release and exists in rawhide repo.
>>>
>>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/37 (x86_64)
ID: 652576 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652576
ID: 652595 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652595
ID
Hi,
We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
setup experience. So let's add a new requirement for that. How about
something like:
Dne 31. 08. 20 v 23:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> Accepted blockers
>> -
>> 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — POST
>> abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core dumps produce
On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote:
You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I
don't plan on making any more contributions.
Done.
domcleal is maintainer of rpms/augeas
domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/augeas
domcleal is no longer watching rpms/augea
On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote:
Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this
teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just have it down
for a week or less when moving it to RDU, but it turned out that
datacenter move was not at all what we hoped for and
Den mån 31 aug. 2020 kl 22:40 skrev Michael Catanzaro :
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:19 pm, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
> > I can't get that command to do anything useful in either F32 or F33.
>
> You should see something like:
>
> $ resolvectl query example.com
> example.com: 2606:2800:220:1:248:1893
"Dominic Cleal" writes:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, at 4:54 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for
>> Dominic Cleal.
>> [..]
>> So, does anyone know how to contact Dominic?
>
> You may remove me from these packages or orphan
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:10:56AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:28 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back,
> > something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and
> > upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. De
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 10:29 -0700, kevin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:35:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > Accepted blockers
> > > -
> > > 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616
On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote:
>> A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream
>> release and exists in rawhide repo.
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809
>>
>> The package fails to install bec
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:35:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > Accepted blockers
> > -
> > 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — POST
> > abrt-server errors when processing zstd compress
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:22 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation media.
>>
>> == Owner ==
>>
On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote:
A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream
release and exists in rawhide repo.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809
The package fails to install because of newly added dependencies that
were introduced up
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:28 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back,
> something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and
> upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 17:27 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back,
> something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and
> upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870
We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back,
something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and
upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368#c26
So I'm going to do a 4.11.1 build (into a side tag first). I'
Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for
Dominic Cleal.
Non-responsive bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874569
Unactioned bugs (earliest is January 2018):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538845
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200829.0):
ID: 652533 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:23 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> Saving 142 MBs isn't going to make a huge difference in download times
> (disclaimer: I don't know how is the internet connection speed in other
> areas, I have not that fast connection of 200mbps down (slowest possible in
> my area)
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20200901.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:17 am, Nico Kadel-Garcia
wrote:
Hiding it inside yet another systemd structure without following the
existing standards is, sadly, typical of systemd. It also puts at risk
restricted environments where providing no DNS is deliberately used to
restrict outbound network
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200831.n.0):
ID: 652454 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652454
ID: 652468 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:25:03 -0500
Greg Hellings wrote:
> I'm sorry, I don't know where the boot media information is kept, otherwise
> I would raise my question there, instead. I'm trying to automate the
> creation of ppc64le systems. x86_64 ISOs have a 30 second timeout on the
> boot menu. ppc64
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
Michael,
The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf.
You're wasting everyone's time with these low-effort spam posts. Lest
anyone become confused, there is a big warning at the top of that file
warning you that it is managed by authselect, an
A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream
release and exists in rawhide repo.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809
The package fails to install because of newly added dependencies that
were introduced upstream.
So previous working package was
p
OLD: Fedora-33-20200831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 32.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
I'm sorry, I don't know where the boot media information is kept, otherwise
I would raise my question there, instead. I'm trying to automate the
creation of ppc64le systems. x86_64 ISOs have a 30 second timeout on the
boot menu. ppc64le machines have a 5 second timeout. With the vagaries of
system
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-09-02 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues
* Roberto Ragusa:
> Standard DNS has a hierarchical structure with roots and delegation.
> The idea of asking somebody to do DNS resolution for you comes from
> the widespread tendency to centralize everything (i.e. inability to
> understand how the Internet was originally designed).
DNS original
* John M. Harris, Jr.:
> Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge
> disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS
> servers when none are configured? If no DNS servers are configured, there
> should be no DNS servers in use.
Acutally, the h
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:34 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-01 08:52, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >>
> >>> ship a release with "fallback" to Google and Cloudflare
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 21:46:19 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I remember it was but it was extremely hard to use anything but the sdist
> when hacking on nb2plots. See:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nb2plots/pull-request/2
>
> Overall, versioneer behaves very badly when you try to be
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Le 2020-08-31 18:08, Zdenek Dohnal a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to package ipp-usb project
(https://github.com/OpenPrinting/ipp-usb) which is written in Go. I
generated spec file via go2rpm, but several files from source tarball
which supposed to be packaged is not packaged e.g. systemd unit file
i
Hi everyone,
Welcome to September! Below are the most recent Community Platform
Engineering project updates, and if you want to know more about our
team, see our wiki page here for more information on who our team is:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/
Here are some upcoming IRC meetings:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
>
> == Summary ==
> Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation media.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:bkhomuts|Bohdan Khomutskyi]]
> * Email: bkhom...@redhat.com
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200831.0):
ID: 652173 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On 31/08/2020 23:05, Adenilson Cavalcanti wrote:
Joining the discussion, since I worked on the original optimization patches and
I'm one of the maintainers of Chromium's zlib.
Just seconding what Jeremy mentioned, it is possible to generate a valid
DEFLATE stream wrapped with GZIP format that
On 2020-09-01 08:52, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
ship a release with "fallback" to Google and Cloudflare DNS?
Big Brother will be happy. :-)
Sure, those two companies will
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:47:14PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> when I want to do a review with: fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b
> 1873407
> i get this error message:
>
> warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires:
> vdr(abi)(x86-64) = %{vdr_apiversion}
It means
57 matches
Mail list logo
