Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le lundi 08 juin 2020 à 09:48 -0600, Jeff Law a écrit : > > I put faith in both the upstreams and packagers to do the right thing > for their project. Right now Fedora policy does exactly the opposite > by forcing everyone to use GCC rather than making an informed, per > project, decision. Look,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:21 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Monday, June 8, 2020 5:03:20 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > Well, if you don#t want that behaviour don't use the partition type > > > UUIDs from the "discoverable partition spec" for your partitions

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, June 8, 2020 5:03:20 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Well, if you don#t want that behaviour don't use the partition type > > UUIDs from the "discoverable partition spec" for your partitions. > > > > It's how these type uuids are defined: > > > > https://sy

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-08 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, June 8, 2020 5:40:56 AM MST Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > Zswap sounds like an excellent idea to look into instead of zram. Not > > only > > that, but it'd allow traditional entry in fstab to configure it, instead > > of some systemd magic that nobody knows about. > > > In that case mo

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-06-08 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 18:27 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/05/20 09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on > > it, using the f33-boost side tag. > > > > If you see "Rebuilt for Boost 1.73.0" in the changelog for one of you

Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings everyone. I thought I'd share with everyone how things went today and where we are at on the datacenter service migration. :) We did get everything we planns to migrated today: * staging services shutdown and machines with those resources readied to be shipped out. * fedora-messa

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Lennart Poettering wrote: > Well, if you don#t want that behaviour don't use the partition type > UUIDs from the "discoverable partition spec" for your partitions. > > It's how these type uuids are defined: > > https://systemd.io/DISCOVERABLE_PARTITIONS/ > > By using these partition type uuids y

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 22:54 +, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > > > > (ZRAM) > > Compression is intrinsic to just the /dev/zram device. The swap > > code > > doesn't share pages between swap devices. The higher priority > > device > > is f

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > (ZRAM) > Compression is intrinsic to just the /dev/zram device. The swap code > doesn't share pages between swap devices. The higher priority device > is favored first until full. Once full, pages don't go through the > zram module, t

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:35 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > Already discussed in the 'support hibernation' thread. > > Most laptops today have UEFI Secure Boot enabled by default and > therefore hibernation isn't possible. And even when the laptop doesn't > have Secure Boot enabled, there's a fo

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 12:21 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Igor Raits writes: > > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 23:11 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:14 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On 04/06/20 16:30 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sa, 06.06.20 02:19, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: > > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does include > > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working groups. > > It's possible to make sure /etc/systemd/zram-generator i

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 06:19:40PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > The query above are bugs not related to c++20, and in some of them from the > comments it appears LLVM is not willing to fix but instead want to try to > change the psABI. The psABI authors stated that they don't intend to change > i

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Robbie Harwood
Igor Raits writes: > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 23:11 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:14 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On 04/06/20 16:30 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy In some ways this means there is no "default

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:02:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 23:16 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 03:03:18PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > Clang/LLVM and GCC are ABI compatible (with the known exception of the > > > alignment > > > issue for atomics) an

Logo designer in coimbatore

2020-06-08 Thread Nishchithh D
The Best logo design company in Coimbatore. https://webellzinnovation.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 23:16 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 03:03:18PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > Clang/LLVM and GCC are ABI compatible (with the known exception of the > > alignment > > issue for atomics) and one should be able to mix and match libraries > > compiled by > >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 21:49 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 01:36:37PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 16:30 -0400, Igor Raits wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > Sadly some upstreams insist on clang just because they like it more, > > > without any technical reas

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 23:04 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:07 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:56 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > wrote: > > > One issue I am concerned about here is debuginfo quality. GCC produced > > > pret

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread stan via devel
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:29:27 -0600 Jeff Law wrote: > On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 13:07 -0700, stan via devel wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400 > > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > > > An obvious example is Firefox. Upstream, the Firefox

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 13:07 -0700, stan via devel wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400 > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > > An obvious example is Firefox. Upstream, the Firefox project builds > > primarily with Clang/LLVM. Yet we force the Fe

Re: Upcoming fedoraproject Datacenter move reminder and plans

2020-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 02. 06. 20 18:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Out detailed checklist for these migrations is available at https://hackmd.io/@fedorainfra2020/rJpsA4FLL The https://status.fedoraproject.org/ page links to a different but similar hackmd.io document. Should it be replaced by this one? -- Miro Hrončok

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

2020-06-08 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:36:11PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to discuss today so I'm proposing we canc

[ELN] Opt out python2.7 from ELN

2020-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, as a maintainer of the python2.7 package I was surprised to see it being built for ELN and I like to start a discussion on whether and how can I opt out this deprecated package from ELN. Since there is no tracker or dedicated mailing list, I am following the advice given somewhere els

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

2020-06-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Petr Šabata wrote: > > Hi, > > while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity > presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion > continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to > discuss today so I'm proposing w

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

2020-06-08 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:46 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 08. 06. 20 13:36, Petr Šabata wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity > > presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion > > continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to b

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

2020-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 06. 20 13:36, Petr Šabata wrote: Hi, while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to discuss today so I'm proposing we cancel the meeting.

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-08 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> Zswap sounds like an excellent idea to look into instead of zram. Not only > that, but it'd allow traditional entry in fstab to configure it, instead of > some systemd magic that nobody knows about. In that case most of everything that happens on my system is magic, I don't have comprehensive kn

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

2020-06-08 Thread Petr Šabata
Hi, while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to discuss today so I'm proposing we cancel the meeting. I'll chair the next one. P _

Re: Inactive maintainer - dmsimard

2020-06-08 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:03 Igor Raits wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Anybody knows new contact of David Moreau Simard ? > Seems that email is not active anymore. Hi Igor, you can join David at m...@dmsimard.com . -Tristan signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-08 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 08.06.2020 07:17, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > Zswap sounds like an excellent idea to look into instead of zram. Not only > that, but it'd allow traditional entry in fstab to configure it, instead of > some systemd magic that nobody knows about. You can try this: https://github.com/xvitaly/zswa

Is there a process for EPEL 7/8 FTBFS issues?

2020-06-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Over time, I've encountered some packages that fail to build on EPEL7 / EPEL8, in some cases, like since forever. Is there an equivalent to the FTBFS cleanup in rawhide / fedora N+1 for EPEL branches? Or are those packages just left to rot? Two examples: - assertj-core (seems to be

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-08 Thread Tomas Orsava
Oooh, that would be perfect! Tomas On 6/8/20 10:57 AM, Florian Festi wrote: May be https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1256 does the trick. Comments welcome! Florian On 6/5/20 4:39 PM, Igor Raits wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:58:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > To me this sounds like too

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap. > > > > That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasiz

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-08 Thread Michal Schorm
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:48 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Some language ecosystems have very low quality unit tests ... I'd discourage the "some test suites are bad, so let's disable them all '' attitude. Some very small and very stable testsuites may still be beneficial to be run every t

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2020-06-07 11:29 p.m., Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:25 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga Good to know. I proceed to remove on my desktop which has 32 GB RAM. I'm not sure whose service this is but I don't have it. After remov

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:55 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > Also, the zpool memory cache is > preallocated, unlike zram devices. Nevermind. This is also dynamic. "dynamically allocated RAM-based memory pool" https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/zswap.txt -- Chris Murphy __

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/6/20 9:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:07:44PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>This laptop with 8GiB RAM is running two VMs at the same time: Windows > >>10 and Fedora Workstation 32. The host is Fedor

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-06-08 Thread Kalev Lember
On 6/8/20 11:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: > irssi huzaifas, jskarvad, orphan   1 weeks ago I went ahead and took irssi as I use it daily. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Igor Raits wrote: > Why is it painful? You have all dependencies packaged that follow > semver (not like Go) and it is quite easy to build those packages. Semver is just a convention on version numbers (and one that, IMHO, is still open to human interpretation). It does not solve the problem at h

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-08 Thread Florian Festi
May be https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1256 does the trick. Comments welcome! Florian On 6/5/20 4:39 PM, Igor Raits wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:10 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote: >> Hi, >> I think it would be useful to ha

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > And Go has all build dependencies in the release where they are used > (not like rust, with magic ephemeral rawhide-only packages) Ephemeral Rawhide-only packages mean the builds cannot be reproduced in a release, which is a clear violation of our packaging guid

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-08 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 10:37, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Iñaki Ucar: > > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 07:12, Gordon Messmer > > wrote: > >> > >> > - I found that [1] does a pretty good job replacing /usr/bin/systemctl > >> > [1] https://github.com/gdraheim/docker-systemctl-replacement > >> > >> I onl

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Iñaki Ucar: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 07:12, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >> > - I found that [1] does a pretty good job replacing /usr/bin/systemctl >> > [1] https://github.com/gdraheim/docker-systemctl-replacement >> >> I only use WSL for an interactive shell, so I haven't needed to do much >> of a

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-08 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 07:12, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > - I found that [1] does a pretty good job replacing /usr/bin/systemctl > > [1] https://github.com/gdraheim/docker-systemctl-replacement > > I only use WSL for an interactive shell, so I haven't needed to do much > of anything with systemd.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/06/20 23:11 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:14 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: "Upstream only builds+tests with Clang and using GCC requires lots of work from the Fedora maintainer to fix problems that upstream don't care about" is a good reason to use Clang. "I've heard the

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/06/20 13:10 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 20:51 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jeff Law: > As we both know, GCC has had ABI bugs as well. Both compilers strive > to be ABI compatible with each other and we should continue to work > together to find and address such issues.

Inactive maintainer - dmsimard

2020-06-08 Thread Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Anybody knows new contact of David Moreau Simard ? Seems that email is not active anymore. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841624 - -- Igor Raits -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcwgJ58gsbV5f5dMcEV1auJxcHh4FAl7d4tQACgkQE