On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:46 AM Andreas Tunek wrote:
>
> I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the
> start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some
> kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved.
>
> However, I still have the pro
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:56 PM Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
> system using an encrypted LVM
>
> Something is wrong
>
> I have not format the /home LV volume and format only the other swap, / and
> /var old LV volume.
>
> The setu
On 3/22/20 3:59 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 22.03.20 um 20:55 schrieb Dario Lesca:
I do not want this situation, I want only the VG device encrypted and
the filesystem created on LV device
Not encrypting /swap makes your disk encryption partly pointless. Your
PC will use swap if you want or n
On 20/03/2020 00:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I had added Dakota as developer (commit?) and when I looked tonight, I
>> notice he had vanished. I've added him now as admin. Is there any way
>> to see how he vanished? Does he need to explicit
Am 22.03.20 um 20:55 schrieb Dario Lesca:
> I do not want this situation, I want only the VG device encrypted and
> the filesystem created on LV device
Not encrypting /swap makes your disk encryption partly pointless. Your
PC will use swap if you want or not. If your device is powerless, your
swap
As noted[0] in January, free software solutions have a role to play in
the current crisis.
Some background is at the bottom of this email.
In Europe, we've already seen broadband networks being overloaded and
some popular meeting services are periodically offline. I've received a
lot of querie
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:34:24AM -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> We've noticed that there is a kernel inside the install.img of the
> boot.iso -- it isn't used for booting, and as far as I can tell it's
> just taking up extra space.
>
> But I have no idea if it's safe to remove it :)
>
> I have t
I am about to build primecount 6.0 in Rawhide. This version comes
with an soname bump. I will also rebuild sagemath, which is the only
primecount consumer in Fedora. The part of the primecount API that is
used by sagemath has not changed, so I do not anticipate any trouble.
--
Jerry James
http:
This should probably only be on the test@ list for now. Please trim
future replies.
On 3/22/20 12:55 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
system using an encrypted LVM
You're overwriting an existing install using the current partition
I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
system using an encrypted LVM
Something is wrong
I have not format the /home LV volume and format only the other swap, /
and /var old LV volume.
The setup keeps the original Encrypted LVM partition but encrypt also
the swap,
On 22. 03. 20 17:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
tests (such as Ruby).
As I would l
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 08:51:04AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:18:35PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
> > > foundation. Plea
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:18:35PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
> > foundation. Please refrain from further replies.
>
> It was not in the spirit of our Friends foundat
Hi Daniel. List moderator here.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 01:30:22PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
...snip...
>
> The disappearance of my blog on Planet Fedora was apparently influenced
> by people in Debian. The Pagure issue notes it is "From Debian".
>
> It demonstrates how people like Sam Hartma
- Original Message -
> From: "Pete Walter"
> To: "Neal Gompa"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Pete Walter"
>
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 4:44:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter
>
> 21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" :
> > On Sat, Mar 21,
Hi all,
Am 22.03.20 um 14:19 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
> I feel you've proved the opposite: filing bugs alone isn't sufficient and,
> apparently, neither is sending out periodic reminders by mail. Perhaps we
> need to be more agressive in encouraging people to find co-maintainers
> that can help th
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200321.0):
ID: 553328 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
tests (such as Ruby).
As I would like to eventually update the openssl also
OLD: Fedora-32-20200321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.07 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200321.n.0):
ID: 553182 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/553182
ID: 553194 Test: x86_64 Workstation
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.30 to 0.13
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/552382#downloads
Cur
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Branched 20200322.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
* Daniel Pocock [20/03/2020 13:22] :
>
> > Over how many bugs and what time period were the requests generated?
>
> More than a year
This is the core of your problem. Not responding to outstanding requests
in a timely manner is a sure way to get more reminders. I suspect
responding to these in a
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0):
ID: 552973 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello!
Is there a tool to which I would provide a package name, source
release (f32) and target release (epel8) and it would output all build
requires transitively so that I know what specifically I need to add
to epel8 to be able to build the target package successfully there?
Thank you
clime
__
On 22/03/2020 12:36, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:22 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/03/2020 04:18, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>>> On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
fou
On Thursday, March 19, 2020 6:49:39 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 03. 20 18:47, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I do in fact have that setup, but I tried commenting it out and now mock
> > fails
> > almost immediately not able to find /usr/bin/yum.
>
> After i removed that config, i needed to do:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:22 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/03/2020 04:18, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
> >> foundation. Please refrain from further replies.
> >>
>
Am 19.03.20 um 20:57 schrieb John M. Harris Jr:
>
> If you're drawing a direct comparison to the Fedora boot process from the
> Windows process, the point at which Windows is presenting an OSK is about at
> the point after which initrd is loaded in the Fedora boot process. It's not
> happening a
On 22/03/2020 04:18, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
>> This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
>> foundation. Please refrain from further replies.
>>
>> --
>> Ben Cotton
>> He / Him / His
>> Senior Program Manager, Fedo
Den sön 22 mars 2020 kl 03:26 skrev Tony Nelson <
tonynel...@georgeanelson.com>:
> On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from
> > the
> > start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was
> > some
> > kind
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Effective since version 0.1.7.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co
34 matches
Mail list logo
