On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:01 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
> I'm initiating the non-responsive maintainer policy for jsmith.
>
Sorry for the slow reply -- I've been busy lately finishing up graduate
school, and I was on vacation last week. I will attempt to respond to your
bugzilla request as quickly a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:22 PM Josh Stone wrote:
>
> When building a normal arch package with noarch subpackages, would it be
> acceptable in Fedora if only *one* of the arches actually took
> responsibility to build those noarch subpackages?
>
> Context: the "rust" package normally builds arch-s
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:32 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in
> > Bugzillas.
>
> Hi,
>
> This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?).
> Nothing should be u
On 11/02/2020 22:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello. I am trying to figure out who maintains dbus-python in Fedora.
The main admin is Ray Strode but I haven't seen any activity from Ray
on that package (git log and %changelog).
The default Bugzilla assignee in Fedora is "Alternative GTK desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796330
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|perl-S
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in
Bugzillas.
Hi,
This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?).
Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or
another D-Bus client li
When building a normal arch package with noarch subpackages, would it be
acceptable in Fedora if only *one* of the arches actually took
responsibility to build those noarch subpackages?
Context: the "rust" package normally builds arch-specific packages, like
"rust" for rustc, rustdoc, and their li
On 11/02/2020 23:49, Sandro Mani wrote:
The gdal, proj and geos packages in Fedora are outdated (plus, recent
QGIS refuses to build against proj 6.2.0).
The latest activity by devrim related to these packages are:
- 2019-11-06: EL8 only gdal-3.0.2 update, which failed to build
- 2019-09-02: EL
Hi All,
Fedora 32 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f33 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f32 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a build
Hi
I'm following the non-responsive maintainer process to ask whether
anyone knows how to contact devrim. Per policy, I've filed a bug for
gdal at [1].
The gdal, proj and geos packages in Fedora are outdated (plus, recent
QGIS refuses to build against proj 6.2.0).
The latest activity by de
Hi,
I am getting an exit code 143 when running dnf in docker, example:
$ cat Dockerfile
FROM fedora:rawhide
RUN dnf install -y openmpi-devel
$ docker build .
...
Running scriptlet: systemd-245~rc1-2.fc32.x86_64 121/121
Running scriptlet: systemd-udev-245~rc1-2.fc32.x86_64
121/
Hello,
Here are the logs from today's meeting:
HTML logs:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-02-11/neurofedora.2020-02-11-16.04.log.html
HTML minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-02-11/neurofedora.2020-02-11-16.04.html
Text minutes are pasted below for yo
Hello. I am trying to figure out who maintains dbus-python in Fedora.
The main admin is Ray Strode but I haven't seen any activity from Ray on that
package (git log and %changelog).
The default Bugzilla assignee in Fedora is "Alternative GTK desktop
environments" I wasn't able to google this
Ok, I managed to solve the issue by defining
-DBOOST_ROOT=%{_prefix} -DBOOST_LIBRARYDIR=%{_lib}
which you didn't... so still I don't know why it was failing, but at
least it's working now.
Dealing with the next issue now... Thanks!
Iñaki
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:02, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On
I'm initiating the non-responsive maintainer policy for jsmith.
Per:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
Week -1:
Mail to jsmith (cc: devel@). Sent 7 February 2020. Subject:
nodejs-babel-runtime - orphan?
https://lists.fedoraproject.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:09:52AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:37:13PM -0500, John Florian wrote:
> > > Can this be improved? I'm sure it can be. I'm genuinely curious
> > > what dracut does
There are still some tricky issues (related to OpenMPI and Python) making
the build fail.
I've integrated the latest changes (
https://github.com/fedorapackaging/fedorareviews/tree/trunk/reviews/boost
/boost_xxx_boost172) and made a first attempt at building on COPR (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud
On 11. 02. 20 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:05 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hello All,
Fedora 32 will be branched from rawhide on February 10th 2020 which is
tomorrow as per the Fedora 32 schedule[1]. The process takes about a
day and everything should be ready by February
On ti, 11 helmi 2020, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno lun, 04/11/2019 alle 08.38 -0500, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it
essentiallyprevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from
getting anybetter. Without people using it, we can't know what needs
to b
Hi,
Starting with Fedora 32, bindex can not be built anymore:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41316281
This is because one of its dependencies, felix-osgi-core, has been
orphaned/retired:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/felix-osgi-core/tree/master
I no longer use bindex,
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:05 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Fedora 32 will be branched from rawhide on February 10th 2020 which is
> tomorrow as per the Fedora 32 schedule[1]. The process takes about a
> day and everything should be ready by February 11th 2020. You can
> still be able t
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:10 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> A further possibility as it relates to hibernation, is having systemd
> activate a swap partition (or even a swapfile) only at hibernation
> time. That would block it from being used during normal usage,
> preserving it (in effect) for just th
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:45 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> This discussion is mixing up two different interpretations of meaning
> of "supported".
>
> - Supported, as in, "this use case is in scope & is a release criteria"
>
> vs
>
> - Supported, as in, "the functionality works from a techni
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:00 am, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
It means that the fixes are available and can be applied to Fedora
package if necessary. I'm still waiting for someone to point out a
specific *unfixed* *critical* vulnerability that some of the folks
posting in this thread
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:29 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-11 05:05, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you
> > can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks
> > hibernation
> > (for obvious reason
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:37:13PM -0500, John Florian wrote:
> > Can this be improved? I'm sure it can be. I'm genuinely curious
> > what dracut does that an rpm couldn't ship. I'd also hate to lose
> > the versatility that
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2020-02-12 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
>
Here are the bugs on tomorrow's agenda:
* BZ 1715900 (Nominated) Aut
Il giorno lun, 04/11/2019 alle 08.38 -0500, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it
> essentiallyprevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from
> getting anybetter. Without people using it, we can't know what needs
> to be fixed.The Red Hat FreeIPA team has
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 02:56:29PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> From
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OM7XMMQ57CI6YJUGLPHAYISABIBFBLLD/#VKU3C5JTUTN74VJG3UV6DMQYV2AI2LJI
>
> You can report on bugzilla-ow...@redhat.com
You can also (if yo
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:59:40PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > We may want to replace it with a simple Web Key Directory server:
> > > > https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKD
> > > >
> > > > That would make it easy to lookup
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200210.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200211.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 196
Downgraded packages: 3
Size of added packages: 536.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages
From
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OM7XMMQ57CI6YJUGLPHAYISABIBFBLLD/#VKU3C5JTUTN74VJG3UV6DMQYV2AI2LJI
You can report on bugzilla-ow...@redhat.com
Regards,
20/2/11 14:38(e)an, Michael Cronenworth igorleak idatzi zuen:
Who / Where is the best
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:40 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> Who / Where is the best place to report spammers in Bugzilla? I think this is
> the
> first (maybe for me) I've seen spam comments in the Red Hat Bugzilla.
>
Yuck. I guess I'm the best person to contact for now. I've set the
spam comm
Who / Where is the best place to report spammers in Bugzilla? I think this is the
first (maybe for me) I've seen spam comments in the Red Hat Bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056436
Thanks,
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
25 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 99/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fed
Hello All,
Fedora 32 will be branched from rawhide on February 10th 2020 which is
tomorrow as per the Fedora 32 schedule[1]. The process takes about a
day and everything should be ready by February 11th 2020. You can
still be able to build packages normally until then, but after the
mass branching
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:37:13PM -0500, John Florian wrote:
> Can this be improved? I'm sure it can be. I'm genuinely curious
> what dracut does that an rpm couldn't ship. I'd also hate to lose
> the versatility that we have at the present. I've been very
> successful with what Fedora has off
Hi all,
I have made a small change to the compose-tracker [0] tool, which is a
fedora-messaging consumer creating tickets in this repo [1] for every
composes that does not complete successfully.
In each ticket you now have access to the time it took for the compose to
run, in addition with the de
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 02. 20 12:04, Ian McInerney wrote:
> > Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main
> F32
> > changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
>
> Not even proposed: Category: ChangePageIncomplet
Hi Kamil,
Hi Jun,
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it.
I write our weekly update in a google doc so my team can collaborate with
me on it and then I copy paste it to my email, which is set to plain text
mode.
I will try a different format for this week as I would like these reports
to be h
On 11. 02. 20 12:04, Ian McInerney wrote:
Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main F32
changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
Not even proposed: Category: ChangePageIncomplete
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
__
Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main F32
changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
-Ian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 10:29, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:05:27PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > "John M. Harris Jr" writes:
> > > On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >> Question and (pre)proposal:
> > >>
> > >> Can Fedor
On 11/02/2020 10:29, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
Hello all.
Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
It
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
> require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
>
> Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
It was a change proposal for Fedora
On 2020-02-11 05:05, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you
can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks hibernation
(for obvious reasons).
You would need to
swapon /dev/arealdisk
swapoff /dev/zram0
hibernate
Hello all.
Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 09:20, Dan Čermák wrote:
>
> Hi Iñaki,
>
> not exactly what you are looking for, but I have recently packaged
> rstudio at $dayjob for openSUSE and recall that we had to do some
> fiddling around with boost. You can find the package here:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package
Dan Čermák writes:
> Hi list,
>
> I've just ran a mockbuild in Rawhide and the following output from
> /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh caught my attention:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh -j2 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-
I upgraded libshout to 2.4.3 version and noticed a source file has a different
license from the other ones. Thus I corrected the license tag from "LGPLv2+"
to "LGPLv2+ and MIT".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 15:56, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > As long as it builds and functions, why remove it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Because it has lots of critical vulnerabilities and endangers
> > > > > end-user devices.
> > > >
> > > > Please name a couple. Nobody has provided a single
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi Iñaki,
not exactly what you are looking for, but I have recently packaged
rstudio at $dayjob for openSUSE and recall that we had to do some
fiddling around with boost. You can find the package here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:R:released/rstudio
More specifically, t
53 matches
Mail list logo
