Il giorno lun, 04/11/2019 alle 08.38 -0500, Neal Gompa ha scritto: > The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it > essentiallyprevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from > getting anybetter. Without people using it, we can't know what needs > to be fixed.The Red Hat FreeIPA team has been working on making this > functionalitywork well with MIT Kerberos for nearly a decade. The > main reason it'snot in RHEL/CentOS 8 is because the functionality is > too new for themto turn it on. > Also, declaring that it is experimental is meaningless. What > definesit as experimental? Is there any particular known massive > breakage?We're not going to ship Heimdal Kerberos because the two > Kerberosimplementations are incompatible and supporting both would be > amassive nightmare. > At this point, the only way Samba Team will stop calling > itexperimental is when lots of folks are using it. That's why > Fedoraships with it enabled. We have the opportunity to help make > thatbetter upstream.
After last MIT Kerberos update, another big problem with samba is gone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748860#c44 Perhaps the time has come to remove "experimental" from the use of samba + MIT Or there are yet some other serious reasons not to do it? Thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 31 Workstation)
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
