Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 04/02/20 10:29, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > > > > People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. > This make you most competent guy :) Just do it. > > > Well, I only have exper

Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans

Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over? - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap

Re: Orphaning hibernate

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:19 AM Michal Srb wrote: > This is more complicated and it would probably deserve a separate thread :) > Java and Python are completely different ecosystems. And Java ecosystem > (apps/libs) is just inherently unfriendly to Linux distributions. It's not > necessary bad

Re: Looking for a proven packager to help merge some spec file cleanups

On 02/04/2020 06:07 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:02 PM Tom Stellard wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there a proven packager available to help me merge these: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blktrace/pull-request/2 >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-lsb/pull-request

Re: GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 21:13 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 01:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as > > described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines > > with > > this error , I'd like

Re: GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 01:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as > described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines > with > this error , I'd like disable this check on VirtualBox until > VirtualBox > fix it , > th

Re: Looking for a proven packager to help merge some spec file cleanups

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:02 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a proven packager available to help me merge these: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blktrace/pull-request/2 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-lsb/pull-request/4 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dmidecode/p

Looking for a proven packager to help merge some spec file cleanups

Hi, Is there a proven packager available to help me merge these: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blktrace/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-lsb/pull-request/4 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dmidecode/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fxload/pull-reque

GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

Hi, Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines with this error , I'd like disable this check on VirtualBox until VirtualBox fix it , the author of pull request [1] also comment "The error also happens if CF

Re: Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing

Thanks a lot, Ankur! I will follow up in the BZ itself. Jirka On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:44 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Jirka, > > > I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software > package > > for the Ra

Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

Il 04/02/20 10:29, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > > People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. This > make you most competent guy :) Just do it. > Well, I only have experience about some really small and simple django projects, nothing big like this. I see Fedora apps ar

Fedora 32 Change complete deadline coming up (and other schedule items)

The change complete (testable) deadline for Fedora 32 changes is Tuesday 11 February. At this point, changes should be in a testable state. Please indicate this by setting the tracker bug for your change to the MODIFIED state. Other upcoming schedule milestones: * 2020-02-11: Fedora 32 branches fr

Fedora 32 release-blocking deliverables

The list of release-blocking deliverables for Fedora 32 is available[1]. If there are any changes that should be made that were part of an already-accepted Fedora 32 Change proposal, please let me know. If an edit is required that was not part of an accepted Change proposal, please file a FESCo tic

Re: Possible gcc/s390x bug (was Re: Mass rebuild status)

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:08:22AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:51:17AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 16:59 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > See > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-failures.html > > > and > > > https://koj

Re: Orphaning hibernate

Great feedback. Thanks! :-) On Tuesday, February 4, 2020, 11:19:31 AM EST, Michal Srb wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:36 AM Michal Srb wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bill Chatfield via devel > wrote: >>

Re: fleet-commander* main admin

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:22 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello Alberto, Oliver, > > given > > https://siliconislandblog.wordpress.com/2019/11/20/hanging-the-red-hat/ > > Should the three packages still owned by Alberto: > > fleet-commander > fleet-commander-admin > fleet-commander-client > > B

Re: Orphaning hibernate

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:36 AM Michal Srb wrote: > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bill Chatfield via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> > >> I may take it as soon as I figure out how. > >> > >> But,

Fedora-Rawhide-20200204.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 27/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-R

Re: Possible gcc/s390x bug (was Re: Mass rebuild status)

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:51:17AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 16:59 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > See > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-failures.html > > and > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-need-rebuild.html > > > > for detai

Re: Orphaning hibernate

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:36 AM Michal Srb wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bill Chatfield via devel > wrote: >> >> I may take it as soon as I figure out how. >> >> But, if you're building a Java app, you probably use Maven to build it, so >> Maven is going to download f

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200204.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200203.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200204.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 208 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 333.98 KiB Size of dropped packages

Possible gcc/s390x bug (was Re: Mass rebuild status)

On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 16:59 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > See > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-failures.html > and > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-need-rebuild.html > > for detailed lists of what needs rebuilding and what failed. libXt's failure on s390x

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

Kamil Paral wrote: > I very much agree with this. The official compose gets done just once, > lowest priority (Note that most tested configurations actually decrease > the compose time, or increase slightly, but nothing major). The image size > is important, so that stuff fits on a flash drive. But

Re: Orphaning hibernate

Hi Bill, On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bill Chatfield via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I may take it as soon as I figure out how. > > But, if you're building a Java app, you probably use Maven to build it, so > Maven is going to download from mavencentral, not the version pac

Re: Orphaning hibernate

I may take it as soon as I figure out how. But, if you're building a Java app, you probably use Maven to build it, so Maven is going to download from mavencentral, not the version packaged in Fedora. So I'm beginning to wonder how useful the packaged apps are. Am I missing something? On Tu

fleet-commander* main admin

Hello Alberto, Oliver, given https://siliconislandblog.wordpress.com/2019/11/20/hanging-the-red-hat/ Should the three packages still owned by Alberto: fleet-commander fleet-commander-admin fleet-commander-client Be reassigned to Oliver, or orphaned? We have an open bugzilla for one of them

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On 2/3/20, David Cantrell wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS [[snip]] Being the engineering steering committee, we all had our own ideas and opinions about what the problem is and how best to approach it. [[snip]] It seems to me that there is not eno

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 2:58 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency > > Yes. Since today. > >> chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to a >> newly built package not bein

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, at 8:58 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a): > > Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency > > Yes. Since today. > > > chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to a > > newly built

[modularity] Modularity team meeting canceled today

As a result of PTO, fosdem, etc, availability for the meeting today is pretty light. We should resume next week. Langdon ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Co

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a): > Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency Yes. Since today. > chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to a > newly built package not being available. One example: > - The newly built dependen

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200204.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200204.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Ceph license change

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:01:24PM +, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:26:46PM +0530, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > Coming in Ceph-15 (octopus) > > > > > > > > Fr

Re: Review Swap

Hello, I'll be happy to swap a review against this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 El lun., 3 feb. 2020 a las 17:57, Breno Brand Fernandes () escribió: > Hi, > > Would someone mind swapping reviews? > I am building puppet 6 for EPEL 8 and this one[1] is the very first >

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, I propose: > reduce install time > reduce image size > reduce compose time > > is the order we should put them in I very much agree with this. The official compose gets done just once, lowest priority (Note that most tested configurations

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 10:03 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I just enabled the content delivery network (CDN) for Copr repositories. > It is provided by CloudFront from AWS. And it is provided for free by Amazon > to Fedora. > [...] > > If you experience any problem with CDN, please let me know. > Firs

Re: [ovirt-users] [feedback needed] VirtIO Windows Drivers - new installer

Hi, It's a bit late, but I didn't get around to testing before now. All seems to work fine. Except for the unattended bit. When installing the guest tools virtio-win-gt-x64.msi /qn The installer prompts if you trust the driver from redhat because the drivers are not signed. Could you sign the d

Re: Ceph license change

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 03:39:14PM +0530, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:26:46PM +0530, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > Coming in Ceph-15 (octopus) > > > > > > From: LGPL-2.1 and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and BSL-1.0

Re: Ceph license change

On 04. 02. 20 11:09, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:26:46PM +0530, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Coming in Ceph-15 (octopus) > > From: LGPL-2.1 and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and

Re: Ceph license change

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:26:46PM +0530, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Coming in Ceph-15 (octopus) > > > > From: LGPL-2.1 and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and BSL-1.0 and BSD-3-Clause > > and MIT > > To: LGPL-2.1 and LGPL-3.0 and CC-BY-SA-

Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

Dne 02. 02. 20 v 13:13 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > I don't have enough competence to start such a big project, but if > anyone is interested I could give a hand. People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. This make you most competent guy :) Just do it. We (the

Re: Orphaning hibernate

Fabio Valentini wrote: > No fedora package depends on hibernate or any of its subpackages. It > can be safely removed. Java on Fedora is in a really really sad state when we do not even carry ubiquitous libraries DEVELOPED BY RED HAT! (But no, I am not signing up to do the work for Red Hat, also

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

David Cantrell wrote: > The goals identified: > > 1) Reduce the ISO image size. > 2) Improve installation time. > 3) Improve image composition time. > > We want input from the community on what the main goal should be 1) Reduce the ISO image size. Kevin Kofler __

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On 2/4/20 9:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: >> Le 2020-02-03 17:11, David Cantrell a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >>> We want input from the community on what the main goal should be and >>> prioritize the rest. For exa

Proxies for Copr repositories

Hi, I just enabled the content delivery network (CDN) for Copr repositories. It is provided by CloudFront from AWS. And it is provided for free by Amazon to Fedora. Technically the original URL copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org is now accessible using download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org The ori

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200204.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le 2020-02-03 17:11, David Cantrell a écrit : > > Hi, > > >We want input from the community on what the main goal should be and > >prioritize the rest. For example, is ISO reduction size more > >important than > >improv

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > = > #fedora-meeting-1: FESCo (2020-02-03) > = > > > Meeting started by decathorpe at 15:06:32 UTC. The full logs are > available at > https://meetbot.fedorapr