On Friday, December 13, 2019 1:34:29 PM MST Mike Pinkerton wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2019, at 15:03, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
>
> > On Friday, December 13, 2019 12:53:57 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> What? There are only two images that are release blocking for optical
> >> media righ
On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 02:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Install from optical is not anymore release critical, that is evident.
>
> To whom? All the VM testing I do is always with -cdrom foo.iso, so it would
> break my VM testing completely. And there is also real hardware t
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 12:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 12. 19 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Optical_Media_Criterion
> >
> > = Drop Optical Media Release Criterion =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking
On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 02:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > What? There are only two images that are release blocking for optical
> > media right now.
> >
> > Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-
> _RELEASE_MILESTONE_.iso
> > Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Wo
Simo Sorce wrote:
> Install from optical is not anymore release critical, that is evident.
To whom? All the VM testing I do is always with -cdrom foo.iso, so it would
break my VM testing completely. And there is also real hardware that it
would break (and there, you cannot work around it by just
Chris Murphy wrote:
> What? There are only two images that are release blocking for optical
> media right now.
>
> Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-
_RELEASE_MILESTONE_.iso
> Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-
_RELEASE_MILESTONE_.iso
> https://fedoraprojec
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 11:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> It...*could* also work for non-candidate (i.e. nightly) Pungi 4
> composes that have been garbage collected by retrieving the info from
> PDC, but this thread has made me realize that's a path that I've sort
> of shut off with some desi
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:34:29 -0500
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
> I would say that the Everything netinstall image is more useful than
> the Workstation Live image:
>
> * netinstall is smaller
> * netinstall can be used to install servers
> * netinstall with updates repo enabled yields current sys
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:09 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> I've just unpushed it and removed the bug reference. An update for
> txt2man-1.6.0-7.el8 was already submitted by you 4 days ago:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-aa7ab9e560
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:48:07PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 12/13/19 1:42 PM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > Red Hat does a 2 week end of year shutdown where nearly everyone is
> > encouraged to spend time away from computers and family.
>
> I know that's not how you meant to say it, but t
On 13 Dec 2019, at 15:03, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, December 13, 2019 12:53:57 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
What? There are only two images that are release blocking for optical
media right now.
Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-
_RELEASE_MILESTONE_.i
so
Workst
On Friday, December 13, 2019 12:53:57 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:24 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, December 12, 2019 10:52:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > We'll just have to see if there's an easy fix for the util-linux
> > > commit tha
On 12/12/2019 03:32 PM, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Ben Cotton writes:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> == Dependencies ==
>> The following packages depend on clang-libs and will need to be updated:
>>
>> * bcc
>> * bpftrace
>> * castxml
>> * ccls
>
> ccls has already been fixed upstream to support building against
> l
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:24 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, December 12, 2019 10:52:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > We'll just have to see if there's an easy fix for the util-linux
> > commit that broke this, which is kinda what I'm expecting. But it
> > might be reasonable to hav
On 12/13/19 1:42 PM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Red Hat does a 2 week end of year shutdown where nearly everyone is
encouraged to spend time away from computers and family.
I know that's not how you meant to say it, but the end result is pretty funny.
:)
_
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:03 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12. 12. 19 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Optical_Media_Criterion
> >
> > = Drop Optical Media Release Criterion =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking.
Hi everyone,
Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail!
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
othe
On Friday, December 13, 2019 12:16:12 PM MST Simo Sorce wrote:
> And *all* old devices also have USB outlets, so it is unclear how this
> would make Fedora not installable.
> Any machine so old to have optical media but not USB is probably
> already not working due to other factors like being i686
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 10:28 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, December 13, 2019 2:00:41 AM MST Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> [snip]
> > I don't expect to suddenly have F32 released with broken boot from
> > optical media.
>
> If we don't want that to occur, optical media needs to remain
t fedfind can help with. As an example of
where you'd start:
#!/bin/python3
import fedfind.release
import fedfind.helpers
rel = fedfind.release.get_release(cid="Fedora-Rawhide-20191213.n.0")
#rel = fedfind.release.get_release(1)
for img in rel.all_images:
imgid = fedfind.helpers
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 03:17 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking. This means
> > we'd stop blocking on bugs found during the installation of Fedora
> > from optical media (like CDs and DVDs). This doesn't mean that
> > installatio
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 12:59 +0100, Adam Samalik wrote:
> The Minimization Objective[1] has been going on for a while. There are two
> high-level goals: making things smaller, and keeping things smaller. On the
> keeping smaller side, the team prototyped a service called Feedback
> Pipeline [2] that
Greetings.
I just thought I would share a short status update on koji builders with
everyone. As many of you know, we like to keep the Fedora koji builders
on the current most recent stable Fedora release. This is to make sure
we have compatible rpm, etc to build rawhide and all our stable update
On Friday, December 13, 2019 2:00:41 AM MST Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
[snip]
> I don't expect to suddenly have F32 released with broken boot from
> optical media.
If we don't want that to occur, optical media needs to remain a release
blocker.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
On Thursday, December 12, 2019 10:52:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> The work around is part of testing the scope of the bug. It's not a
> prescription for production use.
This is precisely why I believe that optical media should continue to be
release blocking.
[snip]
> We'll just have to see
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:59:03PM +0100, Adam Samalik wrote:
> The Minimization Objective[1] has been going on for a while. There are two
> high-level goals: making things smaller, and keeping things smaller. On the
> keeping smaller side, the team prototyped a service called Feedback
> Pipeline [
Hello,
I have a bunch of Rust package to review, would you please give some help in
exchange
of swaps?
1763433[1]
_Review Request: rust-chunked_transfer - Encoder and decoder for HTTP chunked
transfer coding (RFC 7230 § 4 _
2019-12-07 21:27:57 UTC
1763459[2]
_Review Request: rust-multipa
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, obvious question first... Has this caused any problems? When was the
last time this failed?
The latter part is for selfish reasons... I still have one (decent)
computer with primitive EFI BIOS that will only boot UEFI from optical
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191212.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191213.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.89 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 13:36:58 +0100, jkastn...@my-it-brain.de wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
Hello Joerg,
> My name is Joerg Kastning and I'm a Sysadmin who is currently working
> for the Bielefeld University.
>
> On my carreer counter I have round about 15 years of expierience as
> Sysadmin, DevOp
Anyone interested in a review swap? I've got the python-npyscreen package thats
waiting for a review which I'd like to write a few applications using, but I'd
like it integrated before I move to much farther forward:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782532
Neil
__
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20191212.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I've been tracking beta releases of poetry for a while now, and a few
> > hours ago, 1.0.0 was finally released to GitHub [0] and pypi [1].
> >
> > I've made
I tried to compile the vdr with the following patch, unfortunately it fails
with the following error message.
eit.c:25:18: error: missing binary operator before token "("
25 | #if SHLIB_COMPAT (libc, GLIBC_2_0, GLIBC_2_31)
| ^
make: *** Deleting file '.dependencies'
--- a/eit.c.orig2019
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've been tracking beta releases of poetry for a while now, and a few
> hours ago, 1.0.0 was finally released to GitHub [0] and pypi [1].
>
> I've made packages of beta releases available on COPR [2] for some
> time, and
Hi everybody,
I've been tracking beta releases of poetry for a while now, and a few
hours ago, 1.0.0 was finally released to GitHub [0] and pypi [1].
I've made packages of beta releases available on COPR [2] for some
time, and I am not aware of any issues with the 1.0.0 release (rather,
it fixes
Hello to everyone,
My name is Joerg Kastning and I'm a Sysadmin who is currently working for the
Bielefeld University.
On my carreer counter I have round about 15 years of expierience as Sysadmin,
DevOp and IT Project Manager. Using Linux since 2009 as a user and working with
it as a professio
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 12. 19 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Optical_Media_Criterion
> >
> > = Drop Optical Media Release Criterion =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
>
> Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon, though, I
> should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it from the
> Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy. (I figured, doesn't make sense to suggest a
> tool
Hello,
I'd like to remove the following macros from rawhide:
%py_build_egg
%py2_build_egg
%py3_build_egg
%py_install_egg
%py2_install_egg
%py3_install_egg
Nothing in Fedora uses them.
I would also remove this page:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python_Eggs/
Hi
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
>
> `Monitoring` means: you get a bugzilla ticket
> `Monitoring and scrach builds` means: you get the bugzilla ticket and an
> attempt to do a scratch build for the new version
>
I was wondering how hard it would be to open a pull
Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon, though, I
should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it from the
Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy. (I figured, doesn't make sense to suggest a
tool that can't actually be used...)
[1]: https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-
Hello everyone,
Apologies for the cross-post.
As the number of packages maintained by the NeuroFedora team has
increased, so have the bugs, and notifications from Bugzilla. Since the
notifications hamper discussion, we've decided to use a different
mailing list for them. So:
neurofed...@lists.fe
Yup. To be precise, quoting from the NEWS entry added for the change:
* The obsolete function stime is no longer available to newly linked
binaries and it has been removed from header. This function
has been deprecated in favor of clock_settime.
__
On 12. 12. 19 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Optical_Media_Criterion
= Drop Optical Media Release Criterion =
== Summary ==
Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking. This means
we'd stop blocking on bugs found during the installation of Fedora
Yeah, problem is I posted this using HyperKitty, which doesn't give me any way
to do that. 😕
The bugzilla maintainer check auto-mailed Chris's registered address, though,
so there's been an attempt at direct contact.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
ok, that means
stime () has been deprecated in glibc 2.31 and replaced with clock_settime ().
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://doc
Am 13.12.19 um 07:29 schrieb Frank R Dana Jr.:
> As a follow-up to RHBZ 1779063 and in accordance with the non-responsive
> maintainer policy[1],
You should also cc Chris - maybe he is no longer actively following
fedora-devel.
Felix
___
devel maili
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:31 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 15:37 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners: Change [[Releases/32/ReleaseBlocking]] to indicate
> > we no longer block on optical media, change Validation Testing
> > Matrices
>
> I don't
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 9:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 12.12.2019 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking. This means
> > we'd stop blocking on bugs found during the installation of Fedora
> > from optical m
Hi,
On pátek 13. prosince 2019 3:04:37 CET Richard Shaw wrote:
> Looks like Qt just released 5.14, I believe this officially supports Python
> 3.8? So it would probably be a good idea to update Rawhide sooner rather
> than later.
I just finished update to Qt 5.13.2. I'm not sure about Qt 5.14 at
On 12.12.2019 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking. This means
> we'd stop blocking on bugs found during the installation of Fedora
> from optical media (like CDs and DVDs). This doesn't mean that
> installation from optical media would stop working, jus
On 13/12/2019 07:46, Martin Gansser wrote:
was the stime () declaration moved in another header file ?
What is the reason for this.
Commit history explains:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=12cbde1da
But summary seems to be, as was said when the same question
was asked ye
53 matches
Mail list logo
