Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Sunday, November 10, 2019, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > How is statically linked libpython hack? It's just a different way to do > > it, isn't it? > > It means you are shipping 2 copies of the Python interpreter, one > statically > linked into the python3 binary and one

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

That's right because I have a signature not a checksum. On Nov 10, 2019 10:19, Vascom wrote:It is about signatures, not checksums.вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:47 Baxi :I followed fedora source file verification and there was nothing about SHA checksum verification. Also it is 2048

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

It is about signatures, not checksums. вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:47 Baxi : > I followed fedora source file verification and there was nothing about SHA > checksum verification. Also it is 2048 bits long so I doubt it is SHA256 > checksum file. > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-gu

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

I followed fedora source file verification and there was nothing about SHA checksum verification. Also it is 2048 bits long so I doubt it is SHA256 checksum file.https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verificationOn Nov 10, 2019 10:05, Vascom wrote:May be you need

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

May be you need use sha256sum instead gpg? вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:17 Baxi : > Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc > file. Verifying tarball with that signature says, Can't check signature: No > public key. I found his public key in key directory by searching

rpmbuild signature check failure

Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc file. Verifying tarball with that signature says, Can't check signature: No public key. I found his public key in key directory by searching his email and added that key. Now gpg says Bad signature from that person. Also upst

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191109.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191109.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 16:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 11. 19 8:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:> Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Anyway, I've closed NEW bugs with successful builds after the > mass > >> rebuild. > > > > Can you please post an updated list with that done? IMHO, is a better bugzilla q

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > How is statically linked libpython hack? It's just a different way to do > it, isn't it? It means you are shipping 2 copies of the Python interpreter, one statically linked into the python3 binary and one as a shared library. This is much less elegant than shipping a

Trivial NeuroFedora review swap: python-pandas-flavor

Hello, Here's a trivial review if anyone would like to swap for another easy review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770496 If you are a new packager or looking to be sponsored to the packager team, please feel free to review this one unofficially for practice too. -- Thanks, Regar

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 11. 19 22:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:56:53PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 06. 11. 19 20:41, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > > I'll take openal-soft, pdfbox, freealut, python-httplib2, and dos

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 14:06:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:14:14PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 13:16:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > zathura-cb > > > zathura-djvu > > > zathura-pdf-mupdf > > > zathura-pdf-poppler > > > zathura-ps > > > > These a

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

* Ben Cotton: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonStaticSpeedup > > == Summary == > Python 3 traditionally in Fedora was built with a shared library > libpython3.?.so and the final binary was dynamically linked against > that shared library. This change is about creating the static libr

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On 09. 11. 19 18:15, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Saturday, 09 November 2019 at 16:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 11. 19 8:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:> Miro Hrončok wrote: Anyway, I've closed NEW bugs with successful builds after the mass rebuild. Can you please post an updated list w

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 8:31 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sorry, but I'm with Vít there. If Python is running into toolchain > limitations, the goal should be to work on improving the toolchain, not to > add a hack with side effects (bloat, compatibility issues) to the Python > package, a hack with wh

Re: Python Annual Release Cycle adjusted to match odd-numbered Fedora releases

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > ... > "[2 months for RCs instead of 1] allows for synchronizing the schedule of > Python > release management with Fedora. They've been historically very helpful in > early > finding regressions not only in core Python but also in third-part

Re: Python Annual Release Cycle adjusted to match odd-numbered Fedora releases

On Thursday, 07 November 2019 at 13:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to inform you that [PEP 602] "Annual Release Cycle for Python" has > been approved and [PEP 596] "Python 3.9 Release Schedule" is pending > approval: > > tl;dr New Python 3.X versions will be released annually, with

Re: Self Introduction: Lyes Saadi

Hello! On Saturday, 09 November 2019 at 18:07, Lyes Saadi wrote: [...] > So, as a last statement (or paragraph), thank you all, thank you for reading > me, thank you for your hard work, thank you for dedicating your life to > Linux, to help millions around the globe, for freeing the poor and the >

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On Saturday, 09 November 2019 at 16:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 11. 19 8:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:> Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Anyway, I've closed NEW bugs with successful builds after the mass > >> rebuild. > > > > Can you please post an updated list with that done? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Self Introduction: Lyes Saadi

Hi ! So, it's now 1 week that I have proposed to join the package maintainer community ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770147 , it would be really kind of you to review it ;), or give me a thought, not especially sponsorship, just advice) and that I subscribed to the devel mail

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On 09. 11. 19 8:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:> Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Anyway, I've closed NEW bugs with successful builds after the mass >> rebuild. > > Can you please post an updated list with that done? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1701227,1716412,1716488,1716525,1716546,1729908,1734

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 12:46 +0100, Marius Schwarz a écrit : > Am 09.11.19 um 10:12 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot via devel: > > That’s why DoH is intrinsically centralized and rotten to the core. > > > > DoH supporters are perfectly happy with a world where there is no > > standard for delegation

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

Am 09.11.19 um 10:12 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot via devel: > That’s why DoH is intrinsically centralized and rotten to the core. > > DoH supporters are perfectly happy with a world where there is no > standard for delegation. And if there is no standard, classical network > effects will favor the bigg

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

On 06. 11. 19 22:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:56:53PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 11. 19 20:41, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: I'll take openal-soft, pdfbox, freealut, python-httplib2, and dosbox. FAS:limb Thanks for the quick response. BTW For example python-httplib

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 12:04 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 11:09 +0100, Tomasz Torcz a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:18:46PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel > > wrote: > > Here's a network management lesson for you: > > - run DoH resolver* not on

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 11:09 +0100, Tomasz Torcz a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:18:46PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: > > > > > Here's a network management lesson for you: > - run DoH resolver* not on ::1, but on IP available on your LAN > - put above IP in DHCP and RA

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On 09. 11. 19 11:38, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All, Sorry for the late answer but coupld you please keep these - I am working on building them: rpms/couchdb rpms/erlang-clique rpms/erlang-cluster_info rpms/erlang-cuttlefish rpms/erlang-erlando rpms/erlang-erlydtl rpms/erlang-riak_search rpms/e

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

Hello All, Sorry for the late answer but coupld you please keep these - I am working on building them: rpms/couchdb rpms/erlang-clique rpms/erlang-cluster_info rpms/erlang-cuttlefish rpms/erlang-erlando rpms/erlang-erlydtl rpms/erlang-riak_search rpms/erlang-stdlib2 rpms/erlpmd rpms/fop rpms/ugene

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

Hello All, Sorry for the late answer but coupld you please keep these - I am working on building them: rpms/couchdb rpms/erlang-clique rpms/erlang-cluster_info rpms/erlang-cuttlefish rpms/erlang-erlando rpms/erlang-erlydtl rpms/erlang-riak_search rpms/erlang-stdlib2 rpms/erlpmd rpms/fop rpms/ugene

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:18:46PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > > > > > DoH has zero integration and manageability. “It’s not centralized” > > > (but > > > you have to set manually DoH settings in all apps *or* rely on a > > > centralized Google DoH whitelist) is an utter joke. > >

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 01:15 +0100, Sheogorath via devel a écrit : > And the owner should be able to delegate this decision to the > network > > manager. > > > > Then let's talk on how we properly implement this delegation process > instead of asking ourselves whenever we want DoH or DoT o

Re: Please, IMHO, resolve in some way the Samba MIT kerberos problem.

Il giorno gio, 07/11/2019 alle 10.27 +, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: > I can help you here as I'm a Fedora packager maintainer . > > Have you Pull request and BugZilla reports with that information Nico, have you filled the BugZilla Request suggested by Sérgio? For rebuild last samba package w