Le samedi 09 novembre 2019 à 01:15 +0100, Sheogorath via devel a écrit : > And the owner should be able to delegate this decision to the > network > > manager. > > > > Then let's talk on how we properly implement this delegation process > instead of asking ourselves whenever we want DoH or DoT or not.
You can talk all you want it's all handwaving as long as major actors behind DoH refuse to work on it or support it if someone else works on it. That’s why DoH is intrinsically centralized and rotten to the core. DoH supporters are perfectly happy with a world where there is no standard for delegation. And if there is no standard, classical network effects will favor the biggest actor by default. > And how are those devices related to Fedora? They's related to Fedora because Fedora is not a desktop-only distribution so it *is* only concerned with the server-side and network management part. > I really hope for more IPv6 to happen (properly), so pretty much > everything becomes the internet. In a nutshell, that's why IPV6 adoption has been lagging for all this time. It wants everything to be the internet, and deprecate things people found useful. Except that's not how actual people want to use their networks. So all the things that IPv6 authors rejected are slowly being standardized back because that's what people need. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
