> Could this ugly hack work?
>
> %{endif __with_rebar3}
>
> Assuming the %endif macro would ignore any parameters.
This won't work... But RPM could "learn" this syntax and let spec
writers add that kind of comment inside the macro.
A bit far-fetched, I won t disagree :)
Dridi
___
On 6/19/19 6:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working
for years. rpmbuild doesn't like
them anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or were) in the file
`/usr/lib/rpm/ma
I updated libfabric-1.8.0rc1 for fedora rawhide. please rebuild
packages depends on libfabric, as library version bump.
thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 01:18, Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>
> OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced them
> with commands.
>
> I expect that many package maintainers will be hit with this.
There are in fact only 10 packages using these macros:
$ rg '__(acloc
On 6/18/19 9:17 PM, Thomas Sailer wrote:
On 18.06.19 05:31, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Deps with issues:
octave-communications - Need new release for 5.1 support -
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?56514
I have built octave-communications with the patch attached to bug 56514.
Thanks. I
OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced them
with commands.
I expect that many package maintainers will be hit with this.
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019, 12:01:31 AM EDT, Neal Gompa
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>
> I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working
> for years. rpmbuild doesn't like
> them anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or were) in the file
> `/usr/lib/rpm/macros`. The relevant portion
>
On 18.06.19 05:31, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Deps with issues:
octave-communications - Need new release for 5.1 support -
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?56514
I have built octave-communications with the patch attached to bug 56514.
___
devel
I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working
for years. rpmbuild doesn't likethem anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or
were) in the file `/usr/lib/rpm/macros`. The relevant portion of my spec is
here:
-- spec -- %build%{__aclocal} -I auxdir%{__autoconf}%{__a
Planned Outage - fedoraproject.org/wiki - 2019-06-19 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-06-19 21:00 UTC ,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-06-19 21:0
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I again completely disagree. There is no reason for weeks of breakage.
> Most of the issues that break composes are unannounced abi bumps where
> just rebuilding dependent packages fixes it. Or broken deps (likewise).
> Or mistakes made in kickstarts/comps. Or something that do
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CustomCryptoPolicies
== Summary ==
This new feature of crypto-policies allows system administrators and
third party providers to modify and adjust the existing system-wide
crypto policies to enable or disable algorithms and protocols.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[U
Hi,
I'll also take python-email_reply_parser. It's actively developed by
upstream.
Regards, Raphael
Am 17.06.19 um 21:14 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that
Hi Miro,
I can take csvdiff. It has official support for Python 3.7:
https://github.com/larsyencken/csvdiff/blob/163dd9da676a8e5f926a935803726340261f03ae/setup.py#L55
Regards, Raphael
Am 17.06.19 um 21:14 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > Not sure if I understand. Are you saying that
> >
> >%endif%{discard:__with_rebar3}
> >
> > will not work either?
>
> Yes, that's what I'm saying. Or rather, you'd get the warning with that
> too. It all *behaves* exactly the same as before, so it continues to "work".
Could this ugly hack
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 12:23 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I intend to orphan php-maennchen-zipstream-php.
This package is now orphaned.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> texlive-lm noarch 8:svn48145-25.fc30 build 13 M
I thought this sounded like a familiar problem. Indeed, I already
filed a bug about it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715698
--
Jerry James
http:
Sorry, missed part of the sentence.
> There are several ways how one can implement it. I would personally
> prefer pull requests to dist-git over scratch builds. I think it is
> important to keep some visibility in the system, so that not just the
> owner of a change, but also random lurkers can s
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler w
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Sa, 08.06.19 15:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
> > However, in the failing case, that doesn't happen, and systemd hangs
> > indefinitely waiting for it to appear. And in the early debug shell,
> > 'blkid' sees it
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 11:42 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> * Koji -- yes
> * Mock -- yes
Since
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.15
but it has to be enabled manually in config.
Since version 1.4.17 (yet to be released) it will be enabled by default, and
you will opti
On 18. 06. 19 1:43, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey, we have a weird failure with python-sphinx tests described here:
Is texlive-lm installed in the build root?
yes:
texlive-lm noarch 8:svn48145-25.fc30 build 13 M
-
> python-num2words orphan 0 weeks ago
I have requested ownership of this for the neuro-sig.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8450
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Eu
On 6/18/19 3:56 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
So if you have
%if 1 == 1
echo moo
%else # %define aaa bbb
echo foo
%endif # %define aaa ccc
...the value of aaa macro is actually bbb after parsing this. Those
%define's could also be there without the comment marks and behave the
* Panu Matilainen:
> So if you have
>
> %if 1 == 1
> echo moo
> %else # %define aaa bbb
> echo foo
> %endif # %define aaa ccc
>
> ...the value of aaa macro is actually bbb after parsing this. Those
> %define's could also be there without the comment marks and behave the
> same deed.
>
> So the new
On 6/18/19 2:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
This is wrong (not sure if the culprit)
%endif %{__with_reba
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >> I disagree. I think we need ga
On 18. 06. 19 0:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear ltspfs maintainers,
please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332
Hey Miro,
According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ltspfs, this package
has been retired a week ago,
* Panu Matilainen:
> On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Panu Matilainen:
>>
>>> On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
> On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> This is wrong (not sure if the culprit)
>>
>> %endif %{__with_rebar3}
On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
This is wrong (not sure if the culprit)
%endif %{__with_rebar3}
I would rewrite it to:
%endif # __with_rebar3
Actually b
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >> I disagree. I think we need g
Le 2019-06-17 22:04, Terry Bowling a écrit :
Hi
If I may, since I also represented the customer side not so long ago in
a fortunexxx company.
* Customers think we had too many repos. It is hard to find what
they need.
From a customer point of view you sidestepped the demand. Inste
Hello!
Please consider using the "Trivial" keyword in the whiteboard to mark
simple reviews that newcomers can work on.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#The_Whiteboard
We list these separately on the cached review tracker:
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
Easyf
It would be really great to have a proper upstream repository for these
scripts so they don't just live inside of distgit. They could have their
own repository in https://github.com/rpm-software-management or could be
placed in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm-extras. What
ever you li
Hi!
Would anyone like to swap reviews? I've got python-pylatex ready for
review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721409
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Desc
* Koji -- yes
* Mock -- yes
* COPR -- no idea
Koji and Mock are definitely only if you use rawhide chroot.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
> > Dyn
Le 2019-06-18 10:19, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 3:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
Change Page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Example of real b
Le 2019-06-18 10:42, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi folks,
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
All of the following works? Koji, mock and copr?
Mock already worked IIRC.
Regards.
--
Le 2019-06-18 03:27, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
Hi folks,
Hi
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
Change Page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Example of real build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.o
On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi folks,
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
All of the following works? Koji, mock and copr?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks
> > >> things from landing as we can a
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 3:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Hi folks,
>
> as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
> DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
>
> Change Page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
> Example of real build:
> https://koji.fedorap
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:59 PM Terry Bowling wrote:
>
> Oh, I forgot to add that related to parallel installations, when conflicting
> modules are desired, generally containerization or virtualization is the
> recommended solution. However, this is from the RHEL user persona
> perspective. W
El lun., 17 jun. 2019 a las 21:15, Miro Hrončok
() escribió:
> gpart dcantrel, orphan 6 weeks ago
I'll take gpart, is a lifesaver :-)
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8447
--
Francisco J. Tsao Santín
https://gattaca.es
Twitter: @FranTsao
1024D/71CF4D62
* Panu Matilainen:
> On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Panu Matilainen:
>>
>>> On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
This is wrong (not sure if the culprit)
%endif %{__with_rebar3}
I would rewrite it to:
%endif # __with_rebar3
>>>
>>> Actually b
On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Panu Matilainen:
On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
This is wrong (not sure if the culprit)
%endif %{__with_rebar3}
I would rewrite it to:
%endif # __with_rebar3
Actually both are wrong, and rpm >= 4.15 will complain (unlike old
versions
46 matches
Mail list logo
