On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:50 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
> > This bug itself was expected to be an edge case, that not many users
> > would be affected, in that not many would have a stale Fedora 20 or
> > older bootloader. Surely 'grub2-install' would have been manually ru
Hello, Stephen J. Turnbull.
Sun, 5 May 2019 05:58:48 +0900 you wrote:
> As a Mailman developer, I
> will strongly oppose turning on user choice by default because my
> constituents are list owners, not subscribers. But that implies it
> would be rarely available.
That's why it's time to deprec
Florian Weimer writes:
> Based on some reports, I don't think this is how the Gmail
> implementation works. It will discard mailing list mail for senders
> with a DMARC policy that does not set p=reject, too.
Based on conversations with GMail developers, that has nothing to do
with DMARC, tho
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
> I think it should be an option in mailman's settings. Each user can
> enable or disable mitigations for his email address.
Patches welcome at GNU Mailman.
Potential time waste warning: The list owner must have the choice
whether to delegate the choice to subs
On 5/3/19 4:00 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to bump the legion package to 19.04.0
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705033), however for
some reason all tests segfault with openmpi
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34577005), so I
reported this upstre
Chris Murphy writes:
This bug itself was expected to be an edge case, that not many users
would be affected, in that not many would have a stale Fedora 20 or
older bootloader. Surely 'grub2-install' would have been manually run,
or the user has done a recent clean install since Fedora 20, right?
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 4, 2019 1:43:56 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Currently, there is no way to determine who owns the bootloader on a
> > BIOS computer, and therefore to avoid stepping on a bootloader that we
> > don't own, we never update it.
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 12:31 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
> > Actually, that's a problem too. The stale bootloader problem goes back
> > to an era where it was possible to install the bootloader into the
> > first sector of the boot partition, and in those cases, /dev/sda1
On Saturday, May 4, 2019 1:43:56 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:55 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:29:18 AM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > On 04/05/2019 15:24, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >
> > > > I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 tod
Chris Murphy writes:
Actually, that's a problem too. The stale bootloader problem goes back
to an era where it was possible to install the bootloader into the
first sector of the boot partition, and in those cases, /dev/sda1 is
actually valid. And again, no practical way to discover this
automat
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:55 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > This is what happens:
> >
> > # mount | grep boot
> > /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> > [root ~]# grub2-install /dev/sda1
> > Installing for i386-pc platform.
> > g
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:55 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:29:18 AM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
> > On 04/05/2019 15:24, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 today. Upon reboot I see
> > >
> > > grub>
> > >
> > > This seems like a pretty major bug in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 16:10 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think I've been hit by this Firefox mess:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973
>
> or at least all the extensions in Firefox were just now disabled by an
> incredi
> > I think I've been hit by this Firefox mess:
> >
> >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973
> >
> > or at least all the extensions in Firefox were just now disabled by an
> > incredible coincidence. I know it's a Saturday and a public holiday
> > weekend in a few countries, but
On 04/05/2019 16:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think I've been hit by this Firefox mess:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973
or at least all the extensions in Firefox were just now disabled by an
incredible coincidence. I know it's a Saturday and a public holiday
weekend
On 27. 04. 19 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 20. 04. 19 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Only one package (fawkes-devenv) requires python2-defusedxml.
It already has broken dependencies on mogodb-server and the source package
(fawkes) doesn't build.
fawkes-devenv is not required by any other packag
I think I've been hit by this Firefox mess:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973
or at least all the extensions in Firefox were just now disabled by an
incredible coincidence. I know it's a Saturday and a public holiday
weekend in a few countries, but does anyone know if there
Hi,
I just updated to F30 and my docker setup with user namespaces doesn't
work anymore. When I try to run:
docker run -it --rm docker.io/php:7-fpm-alpine sh
I get this error:
docker: Error response from daemon: OCI runtime create failed:
container_linux.go:348: starting container process caused
"
Obviously I don't know your setup, but it's more normal for
the bootloader to be installed at device level rather than at
partition level, so you would want:
grub2-install /dev/sda
Obviously this should have been fixed as part of the upgrade
process - that's why the page is called "common bugs"
Hello,
One detail is missing, see below
On Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:54:49 AM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:29:18 AM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 04/05/2019 15:24, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >
> > > I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 today. Upon reboot I see
> > >
> >
On Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:29:18 AM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 04/05/2019 15:24, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 today. Upon reboot I see
> >
> > grub>
> >
> > This seems like a pretty major bug in some component somewhere. I don't
> > think this is a recoverabl
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 5:30 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 7:26 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
> >
> > On 5/3/19 6:00 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wanted to bump the legion package to 19.04.0
> > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705033), however fo
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQ
On 04/05/2019 15:24, Steve Grubb wrote:
I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 today. Upon reboot I see
grub>
This seems like a pretty major bug in some component somewhere. I don't think
this is a recoverable bug for most people, meaning they would have to
reinstall and possibly lose ever
Hello,
I upgraded from a fully updated F29 to F30 today. Upon reboot I see
grub>
This seems like a pretty major bug in some component somewhere. I don't think
this is a recoverable bug for most people, meaning they would have to
reinstall and possibly lose everything.
What component is at fau
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190503.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190504.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 64
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.65 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:31 PM Irina Boverman wrote:
>
> and this:
> dnf install -y --allowerasing git zip unzip python krb5-workstation
> java-1.8.0-openjdk java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel authconfig expect python3
> python3-requests python3-websockets pycurl which
> Fedora 29 - x86_64 - Updates
Hi all.
libsbml-5.18.0 is coming on rawhide. Packages involved:
COPASI-0:4.25.207-1.fc31.src
libCombine-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.src
libCombine-devel-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.i686
libCombine-devel-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.x86_64
libnuml-0:1.1.1-14.fc30.src
libsedml-1:0.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:13 PM jaltman wrote:
>
> > Say they're not, and need some other distinct setup. If it's
> > standardized, as is seeming more apparent from the existing SELinux
> > hooks, OK. Perhaps it's worth adding to the FSH, if it's such a
> > standard usage?
>
> The use of /afs as th
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 7:26 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
>
> On 5/3/19 6:00 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to bump the legion package to 19.04.0
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705033), however for
> > some reason all tests segfault with openmpi
> > (https://koj
On 5/3/19 6:00 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to bump the legion package to 19.04.0
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705033), however for
> some reason all tests segfault with openmpi
> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34577005), so I
> reported
31 matches
Mail list logo
