On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:13 PM jaltman <jalt...@auristor.com> wrote: > > > Say they're not, and need some other distinct setup. If it's > > standardized, as is seeming more apparent from the existing SELinux > > hooks, OK. Perhaps it's worth adding to the FSH, if it's such a > > standard usage? > > The use of /afs as the default location to mount a cell's root volume > "root.afs" dates back at least as far as 1989. Throughout the 90s /afs > became the root of the public global AFS file namespace. Organizations that > deployed AFS for private namespaces did use other top-level mounts but all of > the worldwide public namespace paths are rooted at /afs regardless of > operating system; even AFS on Windows uses the \\AFS UNC path that is > canonically equivalent to /afs. > > I believe that /afs should be added to the FHS as the standard mount for the > public AFS and AuriStorFS file namespace. All recent AFS-family clients will > interpret the path component below /afs/ as a cell name and search for the > cell's location servers in DNS using SRV or AFSDB records. This permits any > individual or organization that controls a domain to standup storage that can > be accessed from any internet connected device with close to zero > configuration provided the required access requirements are met.
Then I think you want the fhs-discuss mailing list, to help this get through, at https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss. It's a pretty quiet list, so there may be a more active relevant chat channel. Does anyone else know of a more active list or channel to update the FHS ? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
