Compose check report was send also the day before, but there are sill
not updated Rawhide repositories as far as I can tell :/ But hopefully
things are getting better.
Vít
Dne 07. 03. 19 v 7:28 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Huge thanks to everybody who made this possible!
>
___
Huge thanks to everybody who made this possible!
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: ht
The team was able to get koji 1.17 released today. :) So, while the YUM
deprecation got moved out to F31, you may want to pull 1.17 into F30.
Cheers
-- Dennis
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:18 PM Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:25 AM Michal Domonkos
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar
Thanks to Sundeep, who has already started and worked on this.
So hopefully we will have a working py3 zanata-python-client for F30+ soon.
:-)
See https://github.com/zanata/zanata-python-client/pull/52
Jens
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:56 PM Martin Kolman wrote:
> Hi,
> I come from the tha Anacond
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
15 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could no
On 3/6/19 4:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> New since the last couple of weeks but I've been more active working on
> FTBFS issues so can't say exactly when it started. It's never been super
> speedy but also never been this painful.
Odd. I can't think of anything on the server end that has change
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:37 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 3/4/19 9:36 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> >
> > On 3/4/19 6:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and
> >> it doesn't appear to be on my end.
> >>
> >> I'm getting about 100-200kB/s
On 3/4/19 9:36 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>
> On 3/4/19 6:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and
>> it doesn't appear to be on my end.
>>
>> I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's
>> very painful.
>
> Yes,
On 3/6/19 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 18:13 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 06. 03. 19 18:01, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>>> I'm new to this list, but I have been building packages for KiCad for a
>>> little while now. I have a question about rawhide; is it in a freeze r
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 18:13 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 03. 19 18:01, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > I'm new to this list, but I have been building packages for KiCad for a
> > little while now. I have a question about rawhide; is it in a freeze right
> > now?
> >
> > The reason I ask is th
On 06. 03. 19 18:01, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I'm new to this list, but I have been building packages for KiCad for a little
while now. I have a question about rawhide; is it in a freeze right now?
The reason I ask is that I built kicad-5.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc31 on koji back on March
2, but I don't se
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 12:01 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I'm new to this list, but I have been building packages for KiCad for a
> little while now. I have a question about
> rawhide; is it in a freeze right now?
>
> The reason I ask is that I built kicad-5.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc31 on koji back on
>
I'm new to this list, but I have been building packages for KiCad for a little
while now. I have a question about rawhide; is it in a freeze right now?
The reason I ask is that I built kicad-5.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc31 on koji back on March
2, but I don't see it (or any other fc31) packages on dl.fedora
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 07:53, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 12:53 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 17:34 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
>> >
>> > I'm there with you Richard. I don't really get how I can get started
>> > building a module outside of the Fedora
>> > infrastru
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:54 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> With Fedora regular RPMs, fedpkg has "mockbuild" to do local builds. How can
> I do something similar on my laptop for a module?
Modules are just sets of RPMs with extra metadata. To build a module
it is enoug to:
- create a proper modulemd docu
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 12:53 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 17:34 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
> >
> > I'm there with you Richard. I don't really get how I can get started
> building a module outside of the Fedora
> > infrastructure's system (Koji or Copr).
>
> In fact, Copr support building
Hi,
I added Fedora 30 to
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/summary/
Reporting from Fedora 30 works now and you should start to issues from Fedora
30 there.
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 3:17 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 08:47 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > > Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on
> > > $releasever?
> >
> > For the record - we are speaki
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when "git push"ing updates to Fedora's git, I am currently encountering this
> kind of tracebacks:
>
> $ git push
> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
> remote: Emitting a message to the fedmsg bus.
> remote: * Publishin
20 matches
Mail list logo
