Re: Policy regarding service preset enabled (e.g. performance co-pilot)

2019-02-09 Thread Nathan Scott
tandalone fashion. However, you can choose to run it as, e.g.: $ pcp --host acme.com dstat and it will sample metrics from pmcd(1) on remote host acme.com. If you do choose to run the pmlogger(1) service locally, you can use the new dstat on historical data as well, e.g.: $ pcp --archive

Re: F29 updates-testing

2019-02-09 Thread Bojan Smojver
Thank you both for clarifying. -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https

Re: Policy regarding service preset enabled (e.g. performance co-pilot)

2019-02-09 Thread Tom Hughes
On 09/02/2019 19:46, Georg Sauthoff wrote: is there a policy regarding auto-enabling/disabling an installed systemd service? There is, yes: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/#_enabling_services_by_default I'm asking because installing the dstat replac

Policy regarding service preset enabled (e.g. performance co-pilot)

2019-02-09 Thread Georg Sauthoff
Hello, is there a policy regarding auto-enabling/disabling an installed systemd service? I'm asking because installing the dstat replacement[1] in Fedora 29 resulted in 3 additional always running systemd services[2] and 2 open ports. In contrast, after installing postgresql the postgresql syste

Re: F29 updates-testing

2019-02-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 2/9/19 4:57 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Samstag, den 09.02.2019, 22:54 +1100 schrieb Bojan Smojver: >> Anyone understands why this is not being pushed in recent days? > > > Most likely because of this [1]. Since autosign was broken for some > time even the packages for F2{8,9} coul

Re: signing status

2019-02-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 2/9/19 4:48 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Freitag, den 08.02.2019, 08:41 -0800 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: >> Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. >> >> As you know from the other thread: >> >> * The mass rebuild happened and finished. >> * The mass rebuild side tag was merged

Re: signing status

2019-02-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
ew rawhide after. kevin -- > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190209.n.1/logs/global/pungi.global.log > > > 2019-02-09 08:44:00 [ERROR   ] Compose run failed: RPM(s) not found for > sigs: ['CFC659B9']. Check log for details. Unsigned pack

Re: %py3_build should accept options

2019-02-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:48 AM Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option". > I'll see about trying that.. I'm trying to build PySide2 but it's not passing --verbose or -j12 to the cmake builds so it looks like it doesn't matter anyway.

Re: %py3_build should accept options

2019-02-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option". On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 14:40 Richard Shaw Just want to get others opinions before filing a bug... > > Currently %py3_build expands to: > > $ rpm -E %py3_build > \ > CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" > LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}"\ > /us

%py3_build should accept options

2019-02-09 Thread Richard Shaw
Just want to get others opinions before filing a bug... Currently %py3_build expands to: $ rpm -E %py3_build \ CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}"\ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build --executable="/usr/bin/python3 -s" sleep 1 This does not allow passing

Re: F29 updates-testing

2019-02-09 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, den 09.02.2019, 22:54 +1100 schrieb Bojan Smojver: > Anyone understands why this is not being pushed in recent days? Most likely because of this [1]. Since autosign was broken for some time even the packages for F2{8,9} could not be signed for while and thus not pushed to the testing

Re: signing status

2019-02-09 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, den 08.02.2019, 08:41 -0800 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. > > As you know from the other thread: > > * The mass rebuild happened and finished. > * The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag > (to make sure everything wa

F29 updates-testing

2019-02-09 Thread Bojan Smojver
Anyone understands why this is not being pushed in recent days? -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-co

Re: Boost 1.69 update with soname bumps in rawhide/F30

2019-02-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 01. 19 13:53, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 30. 01. 19 13:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25/01/19 15:57 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: With enormous thanks to Denis Arnaud for doing the actual boost.spec rebase, we're ready to update Boost in rawhide, for this change: https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re:package management symlink

2019-02-09 Thread Valor Naram
I rewrote my spec as you can see here https://github.com/ValorNaram/goeasylinux/blob/master/package%20management/package%20install.md and noted "pkcon" as a already implemented solution in all major linux distributions.Thank you all for your time, best wishesSören alias Valor Naram_

Re: signing status

2019-02-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 02. 19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. ... I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back to normal. Is this somehow relevant? https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190209.n.1/logs/g

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

2019-02-09 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> FWIW, openQA tests have been failing relatively frequently with > timeouts while refreshing repos or 503s from mirrormanager for the last > few weeks. I'm pretty sure this didn't used to be anything like as > common... Whether it's dnf upgrade of my system or mock builds, both problems have been