Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

Kaleb, Firstly the title is misleading as there was no heads up, a heads up is notice before you actually push the change, not when you do the change. > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs > starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > > The upstream project doesn't suppo

Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: Boost 1.69 Upgrade

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F30Boost169 == Summary == This change brings Boost 1.69 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships with a recent upstream Boost release. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jwakely|Jonathan Wakely]] * Email: jwakely at fedoraproject dot org == Detailed Description == T

Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change Proposal: Erlang 21

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_21 = Erlang 21 = == Summary == Update Erlang/OTP to version 21. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]] * Email: lemen...@gmail.com, erl...@l

Fedora 29 Elections — Voting now open

Voting is now open for the Fedora 29 election cycle. You can vote in the Elections app[1]. Interviews with candidates are available on the Fedora Community Blog[2], with links available in the Elections app. Voting ends at 23:59 UTC on 20 December. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/ [2] h

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

+1 to the change proposal. Someone still need to submit updates in bodhi and rel-eng would be happy to own that task and it is much simpler than what we have today. On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSB

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

An entire *.rpm file needs to be read only because rpm-metadata chose the file digest to be included in metadata. There is no way for a plaintext file to contain its own digest, true for zchunk as well as current rpm format. ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:16 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 16/11/18 22:07 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > The core idea behind zchunk is that a file is split into independently > > compressed chunks and the checksum of each compressed chunk is stored > > in the zchunk header. When downloading a

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

“Client bits” also means stuff needed for accessing file-system interface of Ceph: – nfs-ganesha-ceph.x86_64 – ceph-fuse and for some users – the rados gateway bits: – nfs-ganesha-rgw.x86_64 - ceph-radosgw.x86_64 -- Tomasz Torcz

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

Forgot about librados, so there's actually a much bigger list: # dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires 'librados.so.2()(64bit)' ceph-common-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-common-1:12.2.9-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-radosgw-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-radosgw-1:12.2.9-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-test-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64

Re: [fedora-java] [HEADS UP] Eclipse dropping 32-bit arches

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 5:32 PM Mat Booth wrote: > The message about Ceph [1] reminded me that we should probably make the > same notification for Eclipse Platform. > > The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support > for 32bit arches. > > The current state is that upstrea

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 02:31:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:45:19AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > > > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > > > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S

Fedora Rawhide-20181205.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 19/131 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181204.n.0): ID: 316203 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/316203 ID: 316204

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

Yes, that is the plan. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > > ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 > > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 > > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg > > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink > > Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file > verification

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

> ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610): The gnupg2 package will keep tha

[HEADS UP] Eclipse dropping 32-bit arches

The message about Ceph [1] reminded me that we should probably make the same notification for Eclipse Platform. The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support for 32bit arches. The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches upstream for 4.10 (r

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe > wrote: > > > > On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are > going wrong. >

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:45:19AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > >> > >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:02:41 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:45, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> > >>> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > >>> >

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:45, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> >>> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl a

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: >> >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl >>> archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. >> >>> The upstream proj

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181205.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181204.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181205.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.08 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl > > archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > > > The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl builders

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs > starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl builders don't have > enough memory (or address space) to build some components.

[HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl builders don't have enough memory (or address space) to build some components. And the other active maintainer (branto) and I don't have cy

Re: Stalled Review Request - Close it and create new?

Somehow I knew this question was documented somewhere in the giant book of Fedora. I just couldn't find it. Thanks for pointing it out. Thanks everyone for the fast response. I'll wait another week before taking action, and when I do I'll make sure to file a releng ticket to get it unblocked. _

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181205.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181205.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are > going wrong. > > > > I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I > opened a bug > to see ht