Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 21:53 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Consistent with my earlier findings. I have no idea why packagekitd or > gnome-software are even running (by default) on liveOS. This wasn't a live boot. From the description it was clearly an installed system. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:47 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > > For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + > > unresponsive installer problem is this bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=157728

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: >> >> For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + >> unresponsive installer problem is this bug: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282 >> >

Re: VM in a logical volume

Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and posted to desktop@ I think the top two memory soaking items are the two gnome-shell instances, one for gdm and one for the user, concurrently. And the lack of zram.service being enabled on liveOS installations, where DVD and neti

Re: The update system has the wrong package

On Tue, 29 May 2018 16:54:00 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. > When I try to create a new update, the system > only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice > not rpcsvc-proto. > > Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken > care of?

[seeking advice] MariaDB - TokuDB storage engine

Hello, I maintain MariaDB. There is a subpackage containing TokuDB storage engine. (available only for x86_64) However the TokuDB can't be build against Jemalloc 5, but on F>=28 there is no older jemalloc version. The build without jemalloc is not supported too. Is it OK to drop the subpackage

Fedora 26 End Of Life

As of the 29th of May 2018, Fedora 26 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 26. Fedora 27 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 29. The maintenance schedu

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: > For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + > unresponsive installer problem is this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282 > > Fortunately, I can give my VM 2 GB to install, but wow. The

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

it didn't help ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M

Re: The update system has the wrong package

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 16:54 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. > When I try to create a new update, the system > only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice > not rpcsvc-proto. > > Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken > care of? h

The update system has the wrong package

Hello, I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. When I try to create a new update, the system only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice not rpcsvc-proto. Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken care of? steved. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): > f3f1b43c6bb1fa705d36f4e2b470e1dc

Fedora Rawhide-20180529.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180526.n.1): ID: 242844 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/242844 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhid

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-31 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-31

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180527.0 Commit(x86_64): 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 Commit(aarch64): f3f1b43c6bb1fa705d36f4e2b470e1dc510af421b3d122457f21f1664b37182e Commit(ppc64le): 372a253acef6db9acced3d1cb

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 18:38, Martin Gansser wrote: i request a new token ! https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-api-token.png did it help? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Self-Introduction: Eamon Walsh, TermySequence

Hello developers, My name is Eamon Walsh and I am submitting my terminal emulator multiplexer server and qt5 client, TermySequence. This is a terminal multiplexer capable of reconnecting to itself, designed for use with SSH and in containers. It supports iTerm2 shell integration, ls --hyperlink, a

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 09:41 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 05/29/2018 08:48 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > > > We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedo

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Jerry James wrote: > For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space > set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with > several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed > an older Fedora

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

i request a new token ! https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-api-token.png ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedor

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:18:48PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 29 May 2018 at 15:24, Till Maas wrote: > > This is also not a serious security threat. > > > > And this claim bases on what kind of facts? > Can you prove this? Sure, there is no logo or catchy name for it. Kind regards Till

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 15:56, Martin Gansser wrote: Thanks all for your feedback. the Pagure API that i am using in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf is Valid until: 2018-07-27 but the request branch gives me this message: $ fedpkg request-branch f28 Could not execute request_branch: The following error occur

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 15:24, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > Just try to grep across /usr for /usr/local. This is not only about > $PATH. > > Many scripts, programs or configuration files have HARDCODED checking > > availability of some

VM in a logical volume

For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed an older Fedora VM and decided to recycle it. I got the Fedora 28 x86_64 Work

VirtualGL license changed

The license in VirtualGL has changed from wxWidgets in version 2.4 to wxWindows in version 2.5.2. Thanks, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 16:22, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 29 May 2018 at 13:57, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of possibilities. Agreed. Hence we tr

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Just try to grep across /usr for /usr/local. This is not only about $PATH. > Many scripts, programs or configuration files have HARDCODED checking > availability of some resources or executables in /usr/local before start > use

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 13:57, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > >> This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of >> possibilities. >> > > Agreed. Hence we try to fight env shebangs by brp scripts. Problem is that this bpr script brs been al

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Thanks all for your feedback. the Pagure API that i am using in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf is Valid until: 2018-07-27 but the request branch gives me this message: $ fedpkg request-branch f28 Could not execute request_branch: The following error occurred while creating a new issue in Pagure: I

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of possibilities. Agreed. Hence we try to fight env shebangs by brp scripts. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ de

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 10:37, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > distribution binaries is extremely dangerous, and I'm really surprised > that > > no one looks on those already discussed here issues (and few similar or > > related) as SERIO

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this > message: > > $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master > $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 > Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28 > > f29

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 13:49, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this message: $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28 f

Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Hi, i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this message: $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28 f29 package builds fine: https://apps.fedorap

Re: flowblade: how to determine the cause of a segmentation fault?

Hello John, May I share your assessment of debug messages with the flowblade mailing list? Many thanks for your examination. Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 12:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: I ended up creating https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite others to improve its description. A very nice description. Can you add some hint

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > > I ended up creating > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite > > others to improve its description. A very nice description. Can you add some hints on what needs to change (/etc/profile?). Z

Re: Updates to mathematical software

On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:03:34 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Paul Howarth > wrote: > > > Do what you need to for pari; your maths stack is the main (only?) > > consumer of pari in Fedora. I originally took pari as I needed it > > for perl-Math-Pari but that's dead up

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > I ended up creating > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite > others to improve its description. awesome, I was about to do the same, therefore I added myself as second owner to express that

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > distribution binaries is extremely dangerous, and I'm really surprised that > no one looks on those already discussed here issues (and few similar or > related) as SERIOUS SECURITY TREAT to whole distribution. IIRC enough peop

Re: Would be possible to add freerdp2 package only for EPEL?

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:58:37AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I thought that this would not be a problem as epel is built on Fedora > infra which is not same as rhel one. The problem is that koji needs to know about the RHEL packages to be able to create buildroots for EPEL. This is were

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 09:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > >> What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right thing (add it to the >> top of the list), just like Debian/Ubuntu. I am sure that they had similar >> discussions and in the end they decided to do th

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

I ended up creating https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite others to improve its description. -- /sorin On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > >> What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right

Re: Would be possible to add freerdp2 package only for EPEL?

W dniu 29.05.2018 o 01:21, Kevin Fenzi pisze: > Nope. koji operates on source packages. If it sees a 'freerdp' source > package in epel that will completely and totally override any freerdp > package in epel and any subpackages it has will be ignored. The name > must be different between epel and r

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right thing (add it to the top of the list), just like Debian/Ubuntu. I am sure that they had similar discussions and in the end they decided to do the right thing. A Fedora change proposal. https://fedora

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

On 05/29/2018 08:48 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0674d672f https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Does this discussion had any outcomes? I tried to find any conclusions in the thread but I missed to spot them. I am asking this because I was redirected to this thread after I opened a bug on RHEL for the same issue, bug that was closed hours later as NOTABUG, something I do not agree with.