-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:51 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > it's pretty easy:
> >
> > when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on luck
> > that they
> > are p
>1) package the version with support of python 3 and forget about python
>2
I like this one because it sounds easier for you.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
>
> 3) package the LTS version for python 2 and the new version for python 3.
>
>
+1 to this one. something similar will happen with django that is dropping
python2 support
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20
> In the third case, wihich consider the best approach, do I need to creat
On 02/21/2018 04:18 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> 3) package the LTS version for python 2 and the new version for python 3.
>
> In the third case, wihich consider the best approach, do I need to
> create a new package and go through the review process?
I believe Django did option 3, since Django 3
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache license 2.0, which
> is
> now incompatible with GPLv2. This change will be in new minor release
> of
> CUPS - 2.3.0, which is currently in developing phase (not in Fedora
> for
> no
Hello all,
python package astropy as ceased to support python 2.7 in its latest
version, 3.0.
It still provides a LTS version that supports both python 2 and 3.
As astropy packagers, we seek advice on how to manage this situation.
So the posibilities are:
1) package the version with support of
Hello,
I'm planing to orphan ncftp, since the new version did not include
IPv6 support (patch from OpenBSD) [1], plus I'm not using it anymore.
NB. scripts using ncftp for mirroring can be switched to lftp, which
includes similar features and more.
Best regards.
[1]
http://openbsd-archive.769
On 02/21/2018 04:35 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> procps-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251736
> flexhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1389575
> coffee-script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1405120
> mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150491
> iptableshttps://bugzil
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 16:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM,
On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> it's pretty easy:
>
> when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on luck that they
> are pulled by something else in the buildroot
>
OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a packager
should I stop adding th
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Fedora 28 has
Hi,
procps-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251736
flexhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1389575
coffee-script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1405120
mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150491
iptableshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1417323
Thank you.
_
On 2018-02-19 11:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:22:56AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add:
BSD 2-clause
to our table of valid licenses?
Which table are you referring to ?
The main list of licenses in the following page already includ
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
>> > --rebase to pick up the
Hello,
I orphaned ath_info, a tool to read and write EEPROM
on Atheros wireless cards.
It only worked with ath5k cards, which I no longer have.
Michal
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
Le 2018-02-21 15:28, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
I guess the problem I am having is I have no idea what we are
"fixing". It all seems like needless form filling for no benefit. If
XYZ-a is always going to pull in ABC.. why are we are explicitely
saying we need ABC. Is the end goal to have eve
On 21 February 2018 at 02:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
>> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
>> So this may not be all the packages which
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On mercredi 21 février 2018 02:35:02 CET Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> > rawhide/f29
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
or anything else -- please let me know.
libbytesize fixed in rawhide
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 21.02.2018 15:16, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote:
# dnf update
[...]
Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace =
7.1-7.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both apitrace-7.1-9.fc
On mercredi 21 février 2018 02:35:02 CET Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
> this means that anythin
On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote:
> # dnf update
> [...]
> Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace =
> 7.1-7.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed
>- cannot install both apitrace-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64 and
> apitrace-7.1-7.fc27.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch,
>
> One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new
Hi
I've received a bug report from a user reporting broken dependencies
when updating apitrace in F27. Upon closer investigation I found out
that on F27
# dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs.i686
will give you apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686, whereas
# dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs
wil
Hello everyone.
This is part of the "orphaning" procedure of mMass according to
guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Orphaning_Procedure
mMass development has been officially ended. There will be no further
updates, bug fixes or support from upstre
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch,
One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is
there a reason why?
(It's not retired in rawhide.)
Fabio
>
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 14:17] :
>
> You can file a bug against the Bugzilla product:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla
>
> I doubt the account will be deleted (that would break the database)
> but the Bugzilla admins might be able to merge the two accounts or
>
Le 2018-02-20 19:51, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
"NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both
NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that
NM> succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an ima
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know.
Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
>> > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > > > > Hash: SHA256
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hey,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build
On 02/21/2018 10:47 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:24 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:24 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at
On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Dne 21.2.2018 v 02:35 Mohan Boddu napsal(a):
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
> this means that anything you do for f2
On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
today I've split⁰ librpmsign from
35 matches
Mail list logo
