Hi

I've received a bug report from a user reporting broken dependencies when updating apitrace in F27. Upon closer investigation I found out that on F27

# dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs.i686

will give you apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686, whereas

# dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs

will give you apitrace-libs-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64. This means that a user with currently installed apitrace-7.1-7.x84_64, apitrace-libs-7.1-7.x86_64 and apitrace-libs-7.1-7.i686 is currently getting broken dependencies when updating:

# dnf update
[...]
Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace = 7.1-7.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed   - cannot install both apitrace-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64 and apitrace-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64   - cannot install both apitrace-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64 and apitrace-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64   - cannot install the best update candidate for package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686   - cannot install the best update candidate for package apitrace-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64
 Problem 2: problem with installed package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686
  - apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture
  - cannot install both apitrace-libs-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64 and apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64   - cannot install both apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64 and apitrace-libs-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64   - cannot install the best update candidate for package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.x86_64
[...]

Where should I submit a ticket for this?

Thanks
Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to