# F28 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-01-29
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have two proposed blockers for Fedora 28 Beta and one
for Fedora 28 Final, so let's have a review meeting today.
If you have time today, you can take a look at the
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-01-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Apologies for the late notice, but we haven't met for a few weeks, so I
thought we could do the meeti
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On samedi 27 janvier 2018 04:34:46 CET Tom Callaway wrote:
>> The new libvpx 1.7.0 update in rawhide bumped SOVER because of an ABI
>> break. I rebuilt all the dependent packages I could find with dnf
>> repoquery, except for firefox and thunderbird due to lack of acc
On 27 January 2018 at 06:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:20:27PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> >Trying to look on one of the top tickets found:
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502717
> >Looks like this ticket is about package which is no long
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:20:27PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>Trying to look on one of the top tickets found:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502717
>Looks like this ticket is about package which is no longer in Fedora.
>Does it mean that current Fedora package orpha
On 28/01/18 15:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Please post questions on the users list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users.lists.fedoraproject.org/
Sorry, will move there. Thought developers may be more into NFS that
users in general these days there being no responses in the user
On 28/01/18 14:38, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On 28/01/18 07:48, Terry Barnaby wrote:
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system
the time taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1
MByte per second across the network interface. If I copy a single
On 27 January 2018 at 21:50, Justin Forbes wrote:
[..]
> > 1) Probably it would be good start posting one time a week summary stats
> > about Bugzilla tickets. Any volunteer to create such weekly report?
>
> 26 27rawhide
> open: 243 191 288
On samedi 27 janvier 2018 04:34:46 CET Tom Callaway wrote:
> The new libvpx 1.7.0 update in rawhide bumped SOVER because of an ABI
> break. I rebuilt all the dependent packages I could find with dnf
> repoquery, except for firefox and thunderbird due to lack of access.
>
> Apologies if I missed so
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 14/129 (x86_64), 3/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180126.n.0):
ID: 188781 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests
Please post questions on the users list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users.lists.fedoraproject.org/
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical m
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now been
> bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL.
>
> Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks
> applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply
Hi,
On 28/01/18 07:48, Terry Barnaby wrote:
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system
the time taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1
MByte per second across the network interface. If I copy a single
large file I see a network data rate of about
Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now been
bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL.
Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks
applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply a
static library, at least in E
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:22 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180117.n.1
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180123.n.1
We've had a couple of these odd duplicate mails with the compose ID
missing from the subject lately. I have to confess I do not know what's
causing them to happen a
On 27/01/18 22:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/01/18 09:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/27/2018 01:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/01/18 20:11 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/26/2018 07:50 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf
> besser82 icecast
Fixed in dist-git [1].
Cheers,
Björn
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icecast/c/8f35faa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:17:26PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> ttorcz hdapsd uptimed
Fixed in git.
--
Tomasz TorczOnly gods can safely risk perfection,
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia
18 matches
Mail list logo
