Richard Shaw wrote: > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now been > bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL. > > Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks > applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply a > static library, at least in EPEL...
Dealing with an upstream that doesn't maintain a stable ABI is indeed problematic. :-/ Your approach (static lib) would be one way to possibly mitigate that. Others: * engage your upstream about being more mindful about ABI and bumping library sonames when changes are introduced. It's possible this may be unintentional and a bug worth fixing (if they knew about it). -- Rex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
