Dne 20.1.2018 v 12:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Why I'm writing this? I want to hear from you if you think it would be good to
> prohibit (or advise, or whatever mechanism would work) usage if conditionals
> in
> (at least) master branch to allow us to develop features faster. Thoughts?
> Suggest
= Proposed Self Contained Change: GifLib5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GifLib5
Change owner(s):
* Sandro Mani
Update the giflib package to the latest giflib-5.x version (currently 5.1.4).
== Detailed Description ==
Update the giflib package to the latest giflib-5.x version (curren
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20180123.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 01/22/2018 11:58 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
I'd like to notify you that today I've finished my works on date
formatting in glibc, that means upstream. These changes are already
arriving to Fedora Rawhide (they should be there tomorrow) and will
be part of Fedora 28. They will be included in gli
On 01/23/2018 05:44 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:00 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/22/2018 10:15 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 19:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Redeclarations in system headers are expected. Do you compile with
-Wsystem-headers? Or do
On 01/24/2018 12:10 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I've proposed a change to update to giflib-5.x for F28+ [1] (which is an
incompatible update from the current giflib-4.x). I did some initial
testing in this COPR repo [1], and have hit a problem with
java-1.8.0-openjdk, which has a BR on itself (java-
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2018-01-24 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-01-24 10:00
PST US/Pacific
2018-01-24
at times it can be fast but for me i find it slow
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Christian Glombek
wrote:
> Hello World!
>
Hi Chris!
> My name is Christian Glombek (or simply Chris :) and I'd like to join the
> Fedora Packagers Group. I'm currently a student of Electrical Engineering
> and Business Management at RWTH University in Aachen, Ger
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> Due to that last line, issued su and password and ran it again:
> # lshw
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> #
>
Due to the fact that you're having segfaults in command-line programs as
well, I'm tempted to say you've got a bigger (hardwar
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 12:35 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 12:22 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > I thought there was a tool to list installed boards, but can't
> > find it. Any thoughts there, other than opening up the system and
> > getting the label information?
>
> lshw and/or lshw
Re-sending my contact request with Josef added to Cc: because looks
like zodbot IRC bot on #fedora-admin lies :P
kloczek .whoowns net-snmp
zodbot kloczek: jsafrane
kloczek .fas jsafrane
zodbot kloczek: jsafrane 'Jan Šafránek'
On https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/net-snmp main admin is jridky :
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 21:25 +, Philip Kovacs wrote:
>> Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests
>> directly?Where exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-
>> package basis?
>That text isn't talking about "fixing the tests", but about fixing the
>*bugs*. It as
Hi
I've proposed a change to update to giflib-5.x for F28+ [1] (which is an
incompatible update from the current giflib-4.x). I did some initial
testing in this COPR repo [1], and have hit a problem with
java-1.8.0-openjdk, which has a BR on itself (java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel),
resulting in it
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:42:29 -
"Greg Evenden" wrote:
> i'd Add it but IMO COPR is to Damm slow
I didn't notice any special slowness. Maybe I was just lucky.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
i'd Add it but IMO COPR is to Damm slow
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
> From: "Christian Glombek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
> Subject: Self-Introduction Christian Glombek (lorbus) / NEEDSPONSOR /
> NEEDREVIEWs / Let's Meet @ DevConf or FOSDEM!
> Hello World!
> My name is Christian
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:06:59 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:42:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:28:14AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > > Good Morning Fedorans!
> > >
> > > On Thursday, a new version of Bodhi was deploy
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
924 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
814 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
786 https://bodhi.fedoraprojec
Hi,
With valgrind-3.13.0-15.fc28 the valgrind-devel package only contains
the development headers needed for building valgrind aware applications.
So it only contains the stand alone headers valgrind.h, callgrind.h,
drd.h, helgrind.h and memcheck.h that have the client request macros
that give hi
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 18:12 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The problem for the OCaml packages is missing tests or tests that
> haven't been run:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-932548462e
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ecd3541af9
>
> BTW these b
Hi,
I'm following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I'm asking for any reaction on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529716
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/net-snmp/pull-request/2
List of proposed changes is quite long.
* Thu Dec 28 2017
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 21:25 +, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests
> directly?Where exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-
> package basis?
> How to fix the tests?
That text isn't talking about "fixing the tests", but about fixi
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 14:16 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > > 1. dist.abiche
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:17:29 +0100
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> If you're interested, I provide a weekly release of Firefox Nightly
> on COPR (with the latest NSPR and NSS), compiled from source and with
> the Fedora patches:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/firefox-nightly/
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:01:56PM -, François Cami wrote:
> Okay, so I'm officially confused.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master
> says:
> "For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD:
> (...)
> A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 20:16, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > > 1. dist.abi
Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests directly?Where
exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-package basis?
How to fix the tests?
The tests are all in your hand, you can fix the dist.depcheck and dist.abicheck
by adjusting the update or the build and you can
On mardi 23 janvier 2018 21:30:07 CET stan wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:02:47 +0100
> Kai Engert wrote:
>
>
> > The change
> > of default has been applied to the NSS library in Fedora 28
> > (currently Rawhide).
>
>
> I compile nightly (future 59) from a local hg repository. After I
> inst
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 16:39, Christian Glombek wrote:
> Hello World!
Hello, Chris! Welcome to Fedora!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic
On 23 Jan 2018 15:39, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
As happens for most releases, I'm updating Boost in rawhide and
rebuilding the affected packages in a side tag (f28-boost).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F28Boost166
If you maintain a package that depends on Boost please coordinate any
upd
> announcement should be made here too
Okay, so I'm officially confused.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master says:
"For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD:
(...)
A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild
when
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:42:57AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > We could either look at modifying the ExternalRedirecct
> > extension to be something like DocsRedirect and hard-code the
Annnd https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6650
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
nm> I don't know about EPEL6, but we use it as-is in EL7 and it works
nm> just as well (except maybe for the %autosetup bits but IIRC that's
nm> autosetup which is broken in EL7).
I had ported autosetup to EPEL6 and then at the next release the macros
showed
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:03:26PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In the end there was basically no good argument for _not_ doing it but
> every time I touch something like this someone crawls out of the
> woodwork to flame me. So I end up hesitating instead of doing anything
> and then I ru
On 01/18/2018 10:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But whom does this help? There are still updates going out daily, the
> repodata download cost is still there, the notifications too if you aren't
> doing client-side batching (and if you are, you don't need server-side
> batching to begin with).
It
On 01/23/2018 12:22 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
I thought there was a tool to list installed boards, but can't
find it. Any thoughts there, other than opening up the system and
getting the label information?
lshw and/or lshw-gui
___
devel mailin
On 01/23/2018 01:19 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Hopefully the Bodhi maintainers can have a look; Bodhi may be caching
> the decision here. IIRC, there's a cronjob to synchronize on the
> Bodhi side.
Correct - currently Bodhi polls Greenwave every 6 hours, so it could
take a bit for it to notice the d
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:02:47 +0100
Kai Engert wrote:
> The change
> of default has been applied to the NSS library in Fedora 28
> (currently Rawhide).
I compile nightly (future 59) from a local hg repository. After I
install it, when I try to start it, it tells me XPCOM not found. But
if I run
- Mail original -
De: "Jason L Tibbitts III"
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
>nm> And the forge macros are now available since
>nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed the push due to upstream
>nm> renaming the file). Heartfelt thanks to Jason Tibbitts !
> Please don't fo
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 14:03 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
>
> SB> Can't we fix things on EPEL, to speed up Fedora devel ?
>
> We can try. See the macro work I've done (though the real work there
> was against EPEL5, which is fortunately forgotten no
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 19:53 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 22/01/18 15:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I have a dual monitor setup with both monitors rotated, using an
> > NVIDIA
> > adapter (9600 GT). Works fine, uses Wayland. Again, you need to be
> > *very specific* about graphics issues. They
> "SR" == Samuel Rakitničan writes:
SR> I think conditionals should be documented with more examples as well
SR> [1], in order to minimize such bugs.
Specific examples of what you'd like to see are certainly welcome. Feel
free to file tickets at https://pagure.io/packaging-committee.
- J<
> "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
SB> Can't we fix things on EPEL, to speed up Fedora devel ?
We can try. See the macro work I've done (though the real work there
was against EPEL5, which is fortunately forgotten now).
SB> another story that is bugging me is python2 packages for example [1]
S
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > 1. dist.abicheck - to make sure the update's ABI remains stable in a
> >giv
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> What needs to be done for this ? I see my package "libvirt" present
> in its UI
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/libvirt
>
> but it says
>
> "Package is currently ineligible for scheduling due to following reasons:
looking
- Mail original -
De: "Mátyás Selmeci"
Hi,
> This looks pretty cool!
Thanks for the feedback!
> One thing I notice in the limitations section of
> your draft is a lot of "we can't do XXX due to lack of release
> discipline..."
> Do you have any recommendations for Go programmers o
On 23 January 2018 at 17:04, wrote:
[..]
>> Strange only is that looks like this bug already is known more than year!
>
>
> Looks like two years... I followed the chain of links in the Red Hat bugs,
> which claim this is already reported as
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762100 and
François Cami wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07
>> ea749cb
>
> This was announced to all package owners depending on tinyxml
On 23 January 2018 at 19:22, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> > I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
> >
> > [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_
> channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
> > Failed to launch GPU proce
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thursday, a new version of Bodhi was deployed that enabled Bodhi to
> gate updates based on test results. You may notice a "Test Gating
> Status" message in the right have side of the page.
...
> There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stab
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
>
> [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
> Failed to launch GPU process.
> Created new window in existing browser session.
> 127.0.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> > now until we know more:
> > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=
> > 46
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiver
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:42 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Where are the instructions? Why is informing packagers, the group
> > most affected by this change, an afterthought? We should have been
> > told about all of this, in deta
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:56:47PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch
> > for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues.
>
> I think that might be a good idea (given how late
On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch
for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues.
I think that might be a good idea (given how late in the F28 process
we are) but for many packages it will just mean we have t
On 01/23/2018 01:28 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
>
> 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> 1. dist.abicheck - to make sure the update's ABI remains stable in a
>given Fedora relea
On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> now until we know more:
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=
> 465f155d140a9fbe34f0f51dbfc2137b2900a6f8
>
Do we have to do anything to proceed
I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
[16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
Failed to launch GPU process.
Created new window in existing browser session.
127.0.0.1 - - [23/Jan/2018 18:24:37] "GET
/?error_description=Unknown+client+ID&erro
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiverdb
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
> > I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
> > think avoiding
- Mail original -
De: "nicolas mailhot"
> Now that the non-Go part in redhat-rpm-macros is merged in devel I'll try to
> do a clean PR on go-srpm-macros.
> Then once Jan or Jakub accepts it it will be possible to play with the
> automation in devel and I'll be able to share my specs s
- Mail original -
De: "Neal Gompa"
> For snipping, use "[...]" notation to indicate skipped stuff. It's
> hard to tell otherwise.
Ok, that was easy to fix :)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
Strange only is that looks like this bug already is known more than
year!
Looks like two years... I followed the chain of links in the Red Hat
bugs, which claim this is already reported as
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7621
I wish this message wasn't crossposted everywhere, but I don't want to
lose any discussion by trimming the CC list. Sorry if replies generate
bounces for some.
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
nm> And the forge macros are now available since
nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed th
On 23 January 2018 at 16:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 15:59, wrote:
> [..]
>> That said... has the patch been proposed for inclusion upstream? It looks
>> like Nick Wellnhofer is taking care of libxml2 upstream these days, so it
>> shouldn't need to wait for Daniel. I see yo
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:00 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 10:15 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 19:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Redeclarations in system headers are expected. Do you compile with
> > > -Wsystem-headers? Or do you something else which is un
(Resending with correct docs list cc. Sorry about that.)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's a bit off-topic, but...when this happens, what do we do about
> > links? There are probably many lin
On 23/01/18 16:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:42 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
Where are the instructions? Why is informing packagers, the group
most affected by this change, an afterthought? We should have been
told about all of this, in detail, prior to the thing being turn
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:50:44PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:13:24 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > I believe the script runs at least daily so if you see something wrong then
> > do
> > report it :)
>
> Here's a recently opened ticket about package "aide":
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a bit off-topic, but...when this happens, what do we do about
> links? There are probably many links to this page. This applies to
> anything being 'converted' from the wiki to docs, I guess...can we make
> wiki URLs redirect t
On 23 January 2018 at 15:59, wrote:
[..]
> That said... has the patch been proposed for inclusion upstream? It looks
> like Nick Wellnhofer is taking care of libxml2 upstream these days, so it
> shouldn't need to wait for Daniel. I see you only included a link to a
> Chromium bug report with the
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:42 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> There are no instructions on how to use it on this wiki page. Okay,
> we'll try using --help:
>
> $ waiverdb-cli --help
> Usage: waiverdb-cli [OPTIONS]
>
> Creates new waivers against test results.
>
> Examples:
>
> waiverdb-
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
If it will be no new actions to the end of this week I'm going to
raise FESCo ticket to takeover at least libxml2.
Yes, libxml2 is security-critical; we can't wait this long to apply
security patches. The Fedora package maintainer needs t
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:28 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Finally, if it turns out you need to push an update through despite of the
> test
> results, you can do so using waiver-cli (dnf install waiverdb-cli). We are
> working on integrating this into Bodhi itself, making this easier.
Good!
Hello World!
My name is Christian Glombek (or simply Chris :) and I'd like to join the
Fedora Packagers Group. I'm currently a student of Electrical Engineering
and Business Management at RWTH University in Aachen, Germany.
My FAS and IRC handle is `lorbus` and on GitHub and Twitter I'm
`LorbusChr
As happens for most releases, I'm updating Boost in rawhide and
rebuilding the affected packages in a side tag (f28-boost).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F28Boost166
If you maintain a package that depends on Boost please coordinate any
updates with me, so that any changes you make in th
On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
I am proposing for inclusion a set of rpm technical files aimed at automating
the packaging of forge-hosted projects.
- Packaging draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging
- https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue
On 16 January 2018 at 18:01, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
[..]
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529121
> >
> > I think you should find a new maintainer for libxml2, and libxslt, and
> > xmlsec1
> > because right now I have little time, and since Fedora changes the rules for
> > spec fi
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:40 AM, wrote:
>
>> - Mail original -
>> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>> I'm curious, what are you missing in the preamble ? As far as I can see
>>> it's all there (even though some values
>>> set to variables %gometa precomputes). I had it's right autogenerated some
>>>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>> I'm curious, what are you missing in the preamble ? As far as I can see it's
>> all there (even though some values
>> set to variables %gometa precomputes). I had it's right autogenerated some
>> parts of it in the past but it's all
>> converted
On 01/23/2018 12:26 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote on 01/23/2018 12:24 AM:
In some cases (such as when a DSO is
loaded as a plugin and is expected to bind to symbols in the main
executable), undefined symbols are expected. In this case, you can
add
%undefine _strict_symbol
- Mail original -
De: "Fabio Valentini"
> So, if I understand correctly, both the forge stuff and the new macros for
> go packaging are completely opt-in?
> If that's correct, this looks like the best solution to me - as old
> packages can then be converted one at a time (which I am loo
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:13 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiverdb-cli
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07
> ea749cb
This was announced to all package owners depending on tinyxml2 right
after the build succeed on f
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM, wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>> As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel,
>> unit-test,
>
> BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not generate them,
> I don't need them, and making t
- Mail original -
De: "Neal Gompa"
> As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel,
> unit-test,
BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not generate them, I
don't need them, and making them work with autodeps would be hairy (deploying
with
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:54 AM, wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>> 2. if your concern is that the *forge* macros are defective somewhere I'd
>>> be curious where as you'd be the
>>> first to report an actual technical problem. I've used them intensively in
>>> raw
- Mail original -
De: "Neal Gompa"
>> 2. if your concern is that the *forge* macros are defective somewhere I'd
>> be curious where as you'd be the
>> first to report an actual technical problem. I've used them intensively in
>> rawhide and el7 with many different
>>rpm tools and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07
ea749cb
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpnPSEACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0zgYBAAqfV6lP/OHdB/tsCsojIw/xjjSt+1jhQzuBO
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 07:36 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 14:33 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > What I'm trying to say here is that each time we want to
> > > implement
> > > some feature in Fedora, we eithe
2018-01-22 20:21 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller :
>
> I saw him mention that he'll be at DevConf.cz, so maybe someone can
> catch him there.
That must have been last year. :-) Unfortunately I can't make it this
time and only came last year to find new maintainers for my packages
and meet with old friend
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 07:36:08AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I'd really like to see us tend towards coming up with macros that
> > provide elegant fallbacks on EPEL. (The %license macro is a good
> > example.)
> There is no fallback for rich dependencies. There is no fallback for
> filetrigge
2018-01-22 1:23 GMT+01:00 Greg Evenden :
> you might even be better to catch him over on the SUSE IRC channels, it might
> be worth a shot to see if anyone in SUSE Packages those packages an are up to
> date an Grab the Source RPM's from there
Good idea, but this shouldn't be necessary.
I'm wor
2018-01-22 0:38 GMT+01:00 Tao Zhao :
> Hi Mamoru,
>
> Thanks for the information! I've pinged his gmail. Let's see how it goes.
Hi Alick,
sorry, I missed that mail. I have given up looking after individual
packages, so make sure to use a meaningful subject if you want to
catch my attention. ;-)
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
>
> Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> waiverdb-cli) which will allow the update to go through despite of the failing
> te
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:04:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 01:49 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared
> > > objects
> > > with undefined symbo
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
>
> Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> waiverdb-cli) which will allow the update to go through despite of the failing
On 01/23/2018 01:49 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared objects
with undefined symbols. Such undefined symbols break symbol versioning
because the are not necessarily bo
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
