On 22 January 2018 at 02:12, R P Herrold wrote:
[..]
>> If it is common in case of EL7/EL6 EPEL packages consumers it is perfect
>> reason to not bother EPEL on master branch because Fedora has noting out
>> from such end users and keeping all EL6/EL7 adjustments are only slowing
>> down Fedora de
On 22 January 2018 at 03:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
>
> Multi-distro spec files in itself aren't that bad. In my experience,
> the things that drag you down are the Debian/Ubuntu and RHEL/SLE
> targets. But they eventually catch up. However, the sad reality is,
> you can only go so far without imp
On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
>
[..]
> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up
> to
> > ABI level so all this should be:
> >
> > a) removed
> > b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> As preface some oneliner result:
>>
>
>> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to
>> ABI level so all this should be:
>>
>> a) removed
>> b) rep
On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> As preface some oneliner result:
>
> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to
> ABI level so all this should be:
>
> a) removed
> b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (and if it is anything older .. remove)
> c) i
On 21 January 2018 at 15:07, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 17:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>> > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen
>> > wrote:
>> > [..]
>> >>
>> >> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
> If it is common in case of EL7/EL6 EPEL packages consumers it is perfect
> reason to not bother EPEL on master branch because Fedora has noting out
> from such end users and keeping all EL6/EL7 adjustments are only slowing
> down Fedora development by m
you might even be better to catch him over on the SUSE IRC channels, it might
be worth a shot to see if anyone in SUSE Packages those packages an are up to
date an Grab the Source RPM's from there
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Mamoru,
Thanks for the information! I've pinged his gmail. Let's see how it goes.
Regards,
Alick
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:57 AM, Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> alick9...@gmail.com wrote on 01/20/2018 12:59 PM:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonres
Thanks Artur, Antonio Trande has also made some suggestions in the
review, I will try them and if nothing changes, I will report the
issue upstream.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
As preface some oneliner result:
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ for i in el4 el5 el6 el7 rhel centos epel;
do echo -n "$i "; grep '%{?'$i * | wc -l; done
el4 10
el5 243
el6 265
el7 281
rhel 5428
centos 239
epel 45
1) Shortly I'm going to create PR with mass change request to remove all
EL4 and EL
On 21 January 2018 at 17:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
> > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > [..]
> >>
> >> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in Fedora.. I would like to make
> >> sure it doesn't cause develop
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:53:30PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 01/19/2018 10:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo
> > [koji]
> > name=Koji Repo
> > baseurl=https://koji.fedorapro
On 21 January 2018 at 14:06, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org.
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubs
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
>>> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots
>>> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well.
>>> They kind-of-work, which is the really w
On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
I took a quick look at build.log for i686, x86_64 and s390x and one thing I've
noticed is that during make install, the s390x build puts the .so files in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib, not %{buildroot}/usr/lib64. The only thing that comes to
my mind now is the qmake script (or some other part of the buil
Hello,
I submitted a package for review[0] about an hour ago and when I ran a
scratch build in koji[1] there was a failure with this message in
build.log:
error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.s390x/usr/lib64/lib*.so*
I had built previous versions of the same pa
On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in Fedora.. I would like to make
>> sure it doesn't cause developers that much problems. As such I would
>> be interested in seeing if the m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpkotIACgkQaVcUvRu8
X0wsgg/9FSdQ+lpGrm8DdSU62Ie7p7Wp2hRTzT69aXavOBYIJ3ecEsjFNIo1VU
On 21/01/18 13:06, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
>>> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots
>>> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well.
>>> They kind-of-work, which is the really worst condition
On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 16:43:23 +0100
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 15:27 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > Just for the record list of things which are now on crash course
> > with EPEL/RHEL Fedora which are widely used in Fedora
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:53:17AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 00:51 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> > Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >
> > > […]
> > > > I was not fully aware of this and I've personally hit this difficulty
>
On 21/01/18 12:06, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots
of different software platforms, and things are just not working well.
They kind-of-work, which is the really worst condition one can h
On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots
>> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well.
>> They kind-of-work, which is the really worst condition one can have.
>
> For me, this looks more li
25 matches
Mail list logo
