On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 4:31 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> Then there's the subtle point that filing bugzilla encourages
> the exhibit of a reproducible test case: the actual command line,
> the actual .rpms for the program and libraries,
> the actual environment variables, attaching [or linking]
> to
On 12/17/2017 13:57 UTC, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 17-12-17 14:33:43, John Reiser wrote:
...
At this point I suggest to file a bugzilla report against the compiler
for not keeping %rsp 16-byte aligned. Include the traceback and
the register info from the gdb session at SIGSEGV, and the identities
Missing expected images:
Server boot x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server dvd x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 55/106 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171213.n.0):
ID: 180801 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_
On 17-12-17 14:33:43, John Reiser wrote:
...
At this point I suggest to file a bugzilla report against the compiler
for not keeping %rsp 16-byte aligned. Include the traceback and
the register info from the gdb session at SIGSEGV, and the identities
(.so name, build-id, .rpm name) of the shared
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. Once again, I
don't think we have anything requiring discussion this week. If you're
aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do
reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for
tomorrow. There's only one proposed blocker, which doesn't seem worth
running a meeting for. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.hap
Resurrecting a very old thread:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within
> > the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from
>
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171217.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
> Anyway, the focus now shifts to the backtrace from
> https://pastebin.com/LCDQpB5d :
> #0 __GI__dl_catch_error
> #1 0x763b76a5 in _dlerror_run at dlerror.c:163
> #2 0x763b701f in __dlclose at dlclose.c:46
> #3 0x74
Dear fellow Fedora developers,
I plan to execute part 2 of the renaming. First part was announced and
discussed here [1]. Recently, Iryna Shcherbina announced [2] plans for
a follow up: changing the requirements. Before that happens I want to
finish my renaming. In this round my changes are rather
At this point ...
You could also plant a breakpoint at the <+0> of each routine
named in the traceback, and print %rsp. It should be (8 mod 16)
because the dynamically-preceding 'call' should have pushed 8 bytes
when the %rsp was 16-byte aligned.
(gdb) b * # use a numerical address, NOT a sym
Dump of assembler code for function __GI__dl_catch_error:
0x76136100 <+0>:push %rbx
0x76136101 <+1>:sub $0x140,%rsp
0x76136108 <+8>:lea 0x4c(%rsp),%rax
0x7613610d <+13>:mov %rdi,0x10(%rsp)
0x76136112 <+18>:mov %rsi,0x8(%
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 11:09 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 04:09 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> > > Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57
> > > on
> > > Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) i
On 12/17/2017 04:09 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
>> Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on
>> Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has
>> "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true".
On 12/15/2017 09:59 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I may have missed something, but I think there might be a problem with
> deltarpms in all the current Fedora releases.
>
> Looking at http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/27/x86_64/drpms,
> there are eight available deltarpms for F27, and if you
Dump of assembler code for function __GI__dl_catch_error:
0x76136100 <+0>: push %rbx
0x76136101 <+1>: sub$0x140,%rsp
0x76136108 <+8>: lea0x4c(%rsp),%rax
0x7613610d <+13>: mov%rdi,0x10(%rsp)
0x76136112 <+18>: mov%rsi,0x8(%rsp)
https://pastebin.com/r03HxDrX
rsp0x7fffd6e8 0x7fffd6e8 BAD: not 16-byte aligned
pc=> 0x7613616c <__GI__dl_catch_error+108>:movaps %xmm0,0x50(%rsp)
The problem is that the effective address 0x...738 is not 16-byte aligned,
and this generates SIGSEGV because
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:04 AM, John Reiser wrote:
>
> SIGSEGV is a bad memory reference, but none of those URLs gives any info
> about the memory reference itself: the address, the size,
> Read/Write/Execute,
> the program counter value, the contents of the instruction stream.
> The pastebin inf
On 12/17/2017 12:58 UTC, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok, so I built the latest version of hedgewars (0.9.23) and submitted an update
and quickly found out that when the game exits (hwengine, not the hedgewars
binary) it get's a segmentation fault.
http://hedgewars.org/node/6879?page=0
https://github
Hello, Richard.
I've happened to stumble across a very similar issue recently. I've been
working on an update to Colorful - which, like Hedgewars, is a game written in
Pascal and compiled with FPC - and the game gives me an Access Violation upon
exiting. This happens after all of "my" code has
Ok, so I built the latest version of hedgewars (0.9.23) and submitted an
update and quickly found out that when the game exits (hwengine, not the
hedgewars binary) it get's a segmentation fault.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f9a419a9e9
I have posted to the hedgewars support
On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on
> Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has
> "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true".
>
> 1) Is there a reason this is not turned off by
Il 16 Dic 2017 23:39, "Spyros Trigazis" ha
scritto:
Hello Fedora Developers,
I would like to join the packagers group and I am sending you
this email to introduce myself.
My name is Spyros Trigazis and I'm currently working for the CERN [1]
Cloud Infrastructure team [2]. More specifically I'm w
23 matches
Mail list logo
