The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration for a
> very low gain, it makes me feel like having an unversioned "python"
> (whether as package or executable names) was a mistake we should let
> disappear with Python 2.
I agree.
From an emotional point of
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
The most important step would be to *NOT* change /usr/bin/python to
/usr/bin/python3, but have it provided by a separate (non-default) package. For
Fedora and RHEL, this would mean the separate package does not get installed
On 07/28/2017 10:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Rebuilds are currently blocked on a new buildroot with some RPM
> debuginfo generation fixes. Rumor has it that there is an unrelated
> issue which prevents buildroot updates.
This appears to be an ongoing issue. I cannot rebuild libcurl until its
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:44:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> > > renam
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> That is a bit confusing. What was the point then? And what should new
> packages be using?
Richard's message was delayed, hence my post. Thanks for clearing that up.
___
devel mailing list -
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>>
>> Sometime ago, the default location of AppStream metadata for addons
>> (*.metainfo.xml files) changed from %{_datadir}/appdata/ to
>> %{_datadir}/metainfo/[0].
> As far as I'm aware, our Appstream maintainer(s
On 29 July 2017 at 17:49, Rex Dieter wrote:
> As far as I'm aware, our Appstream maintainer(s) are committed to supporting
> both locations (as a matter of fact, told me to continue using
> /usr/share/appdata)
That's partially correct. GNOME Software versions < F25 won't know
about the new locati
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sometime ago, the default location of AppStream metadata for addons
> (*.metainfo.xml files) changed from %{_datadir}/appdata/ to
> %{_datadir}/metainfo/[0].
>
> As far as I can tell that change went mostly unnoticed, given that
> most of our packages
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 17:25 +0200, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> FAILED: BuildError: package metar not in list for tag f27-pending
>
> does anyone know what is wrong, and how to solve it?
Hi Jos!
I believe this can happen for a short while after a package is added
(or in your case, adopted). Adding a pac
Hi,
I'm trying to do a build for the python-metar package (first time since
I adapted it after it was orphaned), but I constantly get this error
when I try to do a fedpkg build:
FAILED: BuildError: package metar not in list for tag f27-pending
does anyone know what is wrong, and how to solve it?
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> I visited the relevant wiki page[1] which still
> lists the old location, but I could not edit it, because it says I
> should be a member of the "Packaging" group (btw, who belongs to that
> group and how does one become a member?).
N
Hello all,
Sometime ago, the default location of AppStream metadata for addons
(*.metainfo.xml files) changed from %{_datadir}/appdata/ to
%{_datadir}/metainfo/[0].
As far as I can tell that change went mostly unnoticed, given that
most of our packages still install addon metadata in
%{_datadir}/
I've taken it, though I don't have anything ready for review right now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the chan
15 matches
Mail list logo
