On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 21:00 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Server boot i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA tests: 83/128 (x86_64), 17/1
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 22:07 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> I cannot argue with the criteria as you have set forth. However, I
> never said we should block the release. I said it should work on the
> architectures it does today. That is more than x86_64. We *know* we
> have significant interest f
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 08:30 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon wrote:
>> > OVERVIEW
>> >
>> >
>> > As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
>> > release, a typical Change P
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 21:13 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 6/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170625.n.0):
>
> ID: 113830Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
> URL
On 27.06.2017 17:55, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I need mingw-pcre2 to update mingw-qt5-* to 5.9.0. Review request is
here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461368
Happy to review in exchange.
And one more:
mingw-graphite2 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465676
Pret
Hi All,
= Funding Update - Non Presenters =
The council changed the funding model for this year's Flock and
presenting a session is not required to get funded. We were serious
about this :). If you haven't already done so, get yourself registered
and put in any funding request you have by Friday
On 06/27/2017 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 14:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote:
Apologies, but I was talking about "available in the Fedora Server
repo". Specifically, we have a lofty goal that everything in that
r
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 14:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> > Apologies, but I was talking about "available in the Fedora Server
> > repo". Specifically, we have a lofty goal that everything in that
> > repo would have a module wrapped aroun
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 08:30 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon wrote:
> > OVERVIEW
> >
> >
> > As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
> > release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on
> > capturing the moving p
Whoever set up that service, seriously?
Why would I receive 610 emails for activity in "epel7"? For packages with
a longer git history, it will likely be thousands of emails.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170625.n.0):
ID: 113830 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/113830
ID: 113908 Test: x86_64 un
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 83/128 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170626.n.0):
ID
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 16:55 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't
> > > > package, or calc, which I do)
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:09 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:47:42 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >
> > > > For example, when I run RStudio, I ge
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:47:42 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> >
> > > For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
> > >
> > > R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 10:26 +0200, Silvia Sanchez wrote:
> Where is the the Blocker review meeting?
Hi Silvia! Sorry I didn't see this mail till now. The blocker review
meeting announcement emails always include all the details and are sent
to test-announce@ , so look out for those. Blocker review
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:28 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> IOW, F26 can have 3.4 just fine
> since its not shipped.
Well, it's not quite that clear cut. Even if we ignore the Final freeze
which just kicked in (a significant version update would not be a great
candidate for a freeze exception, in mos
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 13:44 -0400, langdon wrote:
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
> release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on
> capturing the moving parts and dependencies for the work to successfully
> land. As a re
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:28:15PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> We don't do incompatible changes for python within a Fedora version release.
> Major changes should be tied to an OS release. IOW, F26 can have 3.4 just
> fine
> since its not shipped. F25 has already shipped and rebuilding EVERYTHIN
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> > For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
> >
> > R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by this version of RStudio.
> > The Plots tab will be disabled until a newer vers
I ran into this today:
https://gist.github.com/Brainiarc7/aa43570f512906e882ad6cdd835efe57
DRM firmware is loaded by default. HuC and GuC are not. Things work
without them, and things work with them loaded. So what's the pro/con
and if there's a pro, why isn't it the kernel default? Seems like if
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
Hi all,
I am looking for reviewers for a new package, sasutils.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452958
I am willing to do a review swap if needed.
Thanks much!
Stephane
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On 06/27/2017 06:50 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Or port the app from Electron to WebKit, which seems to be the only web engine
out there with a stable API.
WebKit is much lower-level than Electron; it requires C++ programming; and
(from what I
heard in the JavaFX WebEngine group) updating to
2017-06-27 15:19 GMT+02:00 Rémi Verschelde :
> 2017-06-27 15:04 GMT+02:00 Alec Leamas :
>>
>>
>> On 27/06/17 14:13, Rémi Verschelde wrote:
>>
>>> For what it's worth, on Mageia I have no permission problems
>>> whatsoever with crawl. This spec file works just fine:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://svnweb.mageia.
Hi
I need mingw-pcre2 to update mingw-qt5-* to 5.9.0. Review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461368
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:58:04PM +, Langdon White wrote:
> Sorry, meant to write that.. Yes, optional (but cool!)
>
> /me needs to figure out how to capture all these clarifications somewhere
> not-email
Edit them into the change proposal (since it's not approved yet) and
notify Jan that yo
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 10:54 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:44 AM, langdon wrote:
> > On 06/27/2017 08:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OVERVIEW
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As the modularity work starts to enter Fe
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:44 AM, langdon wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 08:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> OVERVIEW
>>>
>>>
>>> As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
>>> release, a typical Change Proposal did n
On 06/27/2017 08:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon wrote:
OVERVIEW
As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on
capturing the moving parts and dependencies for the work
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
And it is likely each app will require different versions of all those
modules, those versions being incompatible with each others.
At that point, bundling with something like Flatpak becomes more
interesting than packaging all those separa
2017-06-26 19:05 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande :
> Hans,
>
> can you check if the permissions in this spec file are correctly set, please?
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/5CP27jxdYtG9DY2FXO6X0A/raw
Unrelated, but Crawl upstream provides nice source tarballs without
bundled dependencies, it woul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465418
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-L-1.0.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4e4b0aa99a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
2017-06-27 15:04 GMT+02:00 Alec Leamas :
>
>
> On 27/06/17 14:13, Rémi Verschelde wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, on Mageia I have no permission problems
>> whatsoever with crawl. This spec file works just fine:
>>
>>
>> http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/crawl/current/SPECS/crawl.spec?vie
On 27/06/17 14:13, Rémi Verschelde wrote:
2017-06-27 14:01 GMT+02:00 Nico Kadel-Garcia :
Where does the game save its files? Does it need to be in a shared
game repository, or does it save them in the user's home directory? If
the games need to be saved into a common space, then does the bin
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:32:15PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> This has been tried by AltLinux, they were using Group tag to organize
>> packages into small repositories and after all they went back for one
>> big repository because of cr
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:26:09PM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> I'm David Demelier, I've been using Fedora since Fedora Core 2. I'm
> active in the FOSS movement by participating in some open source
> projects (FreeBSD, CMake, Mercurial, Duktape and some that I should
> miss).
>
> I think it was
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:44 PM, langdon wrote:
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
> release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on
> capturing the moving parts and dependencies for the work to successfully
> land. As a resu
Hello,
I'm David Demelier, I've been using Fedora since Fedora Core 2. I'm
active in the FOSS movement by participating in some open source
projects (FreeBSD, CMake, Mercurial, Duktape and some that I should
miss).
I think it was the time to start contributing to the distribution I've
been using
2017-06-27 14:01 GMT+02:00 Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> It would help a *lot* if you would say the name of the game. I see
> that it is "crawl", from https://crawl.develz.org/ . And I'm not a big
> packager for Fedora, but do have some experience.
>
> A casual review shows that you're using "install -D" i
It would help a *lot* if you would say the name of the game. I see
that it is "crawl", from https://crawl.develz.org/ . And I'm not a big
packager for Fedora, but do have some experience.
A casual review shows that you're using "install -D" in some places,
"mkdir" in others, not a biggie, just a c
Dne 27.6.2017 v 10:41 Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:39 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>>
> Most people do hear from kanarip at undetermined intervals -- and my
> @fedoraproject.org address w
On 27 Jun 2017 9:42 am, "Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)" <
vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:39 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>
Most people do hear from kanarip at undetermined intervals -- and my
@fedoraproj
On 27.06.2017 02:59, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 00:01 +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 10:23 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 27/06/17 10:11, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 06:40, Truong Anh Tuan wrote:
> > > I have just got updates from upstream developers. A new version
> > > of pencil has been released [1]. I uses Electron,
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 09:02, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release
> Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken dependencies and
> all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this affects
> at least one
On 27/06/17 10:11, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 06:40, Truong Anh Tuan wrote:
I have just got updates from upstream developers. A new version of
pencil has been released [1]. I uses Electron, instead of XULrunner.
I am planning to update the package to keep
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 06:40, Truong Anh Tuan wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 09:33 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > On 26/01/16 14:10, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> >> pencil
> >>
> > pencil did not had any release for a longer time (although they directly
> > recommend downloading a fedora 19 package,
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:39 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>
Most people do hear from kanarip at undetermined intervals -- and my
@fedoraproject.org address works just fine -- I have no messages from
you.
I'm also on IRC, where people
Hi everyone!
The submission deadline for System Wide Change Proposals of Fedora 27
[1] is coming pretty soon - in one week on July 4th.
Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier
better. As the deadline applies for System Wide Changes it is always
good to have most of Self
50 matches
Mail list logo
