Dne 5.6.2017 v 18:59 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 4.6.2017 v 15:22 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>>> Will the second Pagure instance store exploded trees of the upstream
>>> software? Will the dist-git RPM source + patches
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-06-06 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us [
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:36:28PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El dom, 04-06-2017 a las 08:52 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió:
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >I think to aband
El dom, 04-06-2017 a las 08:52 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" > > wrote:
> >
> >I think to abandon the packager group for non-scratch builds
> > would be a
> >mistake.
El sáb, 03-06-2017 a las 09:32 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:52:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > With the deprecation of pkgdb2, pagure will make it even easier
> > > to
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El lun, 05-06-2017 a las 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió:
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, wrote:
>> > Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a
>> > whole.
>> >
>>
>> Not always. Most of the time, they are, yes.
El lun, 05-06-2017 a las 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, wrote:
> > Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a
> > whole.
> >
>
> Not always. Most of the time, they are, yes. But if someone chose a
> Free Software license other than tha
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:35:46PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 07:24:36PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > On 04/06/17 14:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to push on this some mo
HI,
I decided to orphan rabbitmq-java-client and lyra because I don't use them any
longer. There are build issues with updates, lyra needs a more current
rabbitmq-java-client for enhanced API. New versions of rabbitmq-java-client
show unresolvable dependencies due to not available packages. Fur
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 4.6.2017 v 15:22 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> >
> > Will the second Pagure instance store exploded trees of the upstream
> > software? Will the dist-git RPM source + patches form be generated
> > from that?
> >
> > Rich.
>
Il giorno lun, 05/06/2017 alle 12.55 +, Petr Pisar ha scritto:
> Is MTU path discovery broken? I.e. IP packets bigger then MTU of the
> tunnel do not pass. You can try to send ICMP packets with bigger and
> bigger size while don't-fragment bit is set. You can use ping tool
> for the tests.
I t
On 2017-06-02, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Yesterday I have update my fedora 25 and after reboot VPN l2tp+ipsec do
> not work anymore.
>
> The connection happens without problem, the routing are set correctly,
> the DNS (UDP protocol) and ping (ICMP protocol) to remote host work.
>
> Only the access to s
There is also groups in fas for alternate architectures. On top of CVS admin
and proven packager, that all some how have to be tied into the ACLS. Proven
packager give you access to everything except for the Mozilla packages and the
others give access to everything.
Dennis
On 2 June 2017 2:42
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, wrote:
> Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a whole.
>
Not always. Most of the time, they are, yes. But if someone chose a
Free Software license other than that or if the spec file was from the
upstream project, it's usually under diff
From a9c28caf7624be71c2d12cf13fbaf73451bbf377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:40:29 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild
---
perl-Crypt-DH-GMP.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-DH-GMP.spec b/perl-Crypt-DH-
From 78fb7642216da3f314f7469578160b40b90936e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:40:29 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild
---
perl-HTTP-Cache-Transparent.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Cache-Transparent.s
Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a whole.
Dennis
On 2 June 2017 3:07:15 pm GMT-05:00, Matthew Miller
wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)
>
>I know Richard Fontana
Dne 4.6.2017 v 15:22 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>
> Will the second Pagure instance store exploded trees of the upstream
> software? Will the dist-git RPM source + patches form be generated
> from that?
>
> Rich.
>
Hi Rich,
Could you elaborate about your use case?
Just today, I discussed t
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Why are you using F24 GPG key for F25 package?
I don't know. Apparently, mock shipped such a configuration in the past.
> As of F25 mock started to use `distribution-gpg-key` package and the line in
> config should be:
>
>
> gpgkey=f
From ca4f4c98ba35825542d632ac9f927f64d6b75f02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:35:25 +0200
Subject: 1.57 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-threads-shared.spec | 13 ++--
sources
Dne 4.6.2017 v 09:30 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> $ mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --init
> warning:
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/root/var/cache/dnf/updates-87ad44ec2dc11249/packages/util-linux-2.28.2-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm:
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fdb19c98: NOKEY
> Importing GPG key 0x81
21 matches
Mail list logo
